Sabitlenmiş Tweet
NEVER_GIVE_UP
3.1K posts
NEVER_GIVE_UP
@nevergiveup2o
Strength to Push👊 Slow growth. Quiet strength. Motivation for the days that feels like Quit. A sinnerwoman unworthy, but Saved by Christ!
Lagos Katılım Eylül 2013
122 Takip Edilen82 Takipçiler
@Shehu478392 Worshippers of muhammad, will always find reasons to shed blood…
English
Many Northern Islamic extremists are on the TL supporting the Islamic clerics who put a million naira bounty on the head of a pastor he accused of blasphemy. They are thirsty for blood. They want to kill for Muhammed so that they would get automatic ticket to jannah. Fear Islam.
English
Muslims worship Muhammed. He's rated than Allah in Islam. Islamic singers literally worship Muhammed with songs. Muslims kill people who blasphem Muhammed but will never kill for Allah.
English
English
@NoOne____is @BashirAhmaad He's surey not God, it's stated many places in your Bibble
English
I am only responding to you because you mentioned my name. While I believe the scholar’s action is wrong and condemnable, it is important to first address the pastor’s provocative remarks that triggered the situation. The scholar’s statement, though unacceptable, did not occur in a vacuum and would not have been made without that initial provocation.
Brother Possible@BrotherPossible
Rev. Ezekiel Dachomo has never threatened one person like this. Yet, you'll see Bashir and his goons attacking him day and night. Now, look at this. That Alex Babir guy was haunted like a terrorist simply for speaking against Christian Genocide. And there's this unfortunate son of that unfortunate religion threatening a pastor, and everyone is looking away. God will sha punish you people.
English
@Ahmed76045460 @dahirudandubai @Shehu478392 Controlled variation is still variation
Multiple authentic forms still means the text is not preserved in one single exact form.
English
@nevergiveup2o @dahirudandubai @Shehu478392 Yes, there’s variation — but it’s controlled and transmitted, not random or conflicting.
Qirā’āt were taught by the Prophet ﷺ himself. Variation doesn’t make multiple Qur’ans; it shows one text preserved in multiple authentic forms.
English
While growing up as a Muslim, we were told that Islam is one and sects don't exist. We ignorantly used this lie to mock Christianity. Only to grow up to discover that Islam has many sects.
Honestly without lies Islam dies.
English
@Theo_102_ @Shehu478392 Attacking the resurrection does not prove your claim.
English
@nevergiveup2o @Shehu478392 You're ignoring the point that there is no prophetic validation for the resurrection.
English
The claim that Muslims love Jesus must be the biggest lie ever told in the history of life on earth.
English
@Theo_102_ @Shehu478392 I thought your argument was about Isaiah 29 endorsing muhammad.
What has the resurrection & d account of crucifixion got to do with the topic?
English
@nevergiveup2o @Shehu478392 No, the point is that there is no prophetic validation for the resurrection.
This is consistent with the account of the crucifixion from the Quran.
English
@Theo_102_ @Shehu478392 For I will be like a lion to Ephraim, like a great lion to Judah… Hosea 5:14
You are not reading context. You are building doctrine out of cut & paste phrases.
Hosea’s lion is judgment, Revelation’s Lion is a title, and neither turns Isaiah 29 into Muhammad.
English
@nevergiveup2o @Shehu478392 The sealed book was opened by the lion of the tribe of Judah (Hosea 5:14).
... in the third day he will raise us up, and we shall live in his sight.
Hosea 6:2
... it is written ... it behoved Christ to suffer, and to rise from the dead the third day
Luke 24:46
English
@Theo_102_ @Shehu478392 You are isolating a few similarities and treating them as the meaning of the text.
No that is not the core idea.
The core ideas come from the verse in its paragraph and chapter.
The rational basis is that verse 12 has a verse 11 before it and a chapter around it.
Why bypass it?
English
@nevergiveup2o @Shehu478392 They're not details, they're the core ideas of Isaiah 29:12.
You have no rational basis for rejecting relevant context.
English
@Theo_102_ @Shehu478392 If Daniel is your context, then keep the context all the way through Revelation, where the scroll belongs to the Lamb, not Muhammad.
English
@nevergiveup2o @Shehu478392 How would you would you read in context of Daniel's vision?
English
@Theo_102_ @Shehu478392 Seeing a few matching details is pattern recognition.
Pretending that cancels the chapter’s actual context is wishful reading…
English
@nevergiveup2o @Shehu478392 No, you're assuming that the identification of common elements is the same thing as smuggling.
English
@Theo_102_ @Shehu478392 You’re not reading in context.
You’re pattern matching, making a collage.
English
@nevergiveup2o @Shehu478392 You're ignoring relevant context about wine/drunkenness, Daniel's vision, and the unsealing of the book in Revelation.
English
@Theo_102_ @Shehu478392 The interpretation with fewer assumptions is the one that does not need Muhammad smuggled into the text.
Read in context, stop trying to fix what is not into the text by your assumptions or imaginations!
English
@nevergiveup2o @Shehu478392 I don't need anything from you. If you want to show that you have a better interpretation that it's on you to provide one that is consistent with the relevant facts and makes fewer assumptions that mine.
English
@Theo_102_ @Shehu478392 When your prophecy needs guesswork, imported theology, and ignored context, it is not prophecy.
The context is about judgement on Ariel/Jerusalem!
English
@nevergiveup2o @Shehu478392 Nobody else matches the description. You don't have a better explanation for the facts.
English
@Theo_102_ @Shehu478392 What better interpretation do you need outside the context?
English
@nevergiveup2o @Shehu478392 I don't see a better interpretation from you.
English
@Theo_102_ @Shehu478392 Isaiah says ‘cannot read,’ not ‘Muhammad, seal of prophet from Arabia.’ The rest is just your imagination.
English
@nevergiveup2o @Shehu478392 No, most illiterate men are not called the seal of the prophets.
English
@Ahmed76045460 @dahirudandubai @Shehu478392 Exactly!
You admit variation. So the original claim ‘just recitation styles’ is false.
Non-contradictory variation is still variation.
English
@nevergiveup2o @dahirudandubai @Shehu478392 No one denies variation in qirā’āt—the point is no contradiction.
In 3:146, “prophets fought” and “prophets were killed” aren’t opposites; they describe different realities among prophets. Some fought, some were killed.
English
@Theo_102_ @Shehu478392 All illiterate men fit that description…
Not only muhammad.
You’re not making logic yet!
English
@nevergiveup2o @Shehu478392 The part that describes an illiterate man protesting that he cannot read the book.
English
@Theo_102_ @Shehu478392 Endorsed by your imaginary Isaiah, clearly not endorsed by the Isaiah you’re trying to reference with your forced interpretation on the text.
English
@nevergiveup2o @Shehu478392 My point is that Muhammad was endorsed by Isaiah as the seal of the prophets. This is meaningful for the unsealing of the book in Revelation.
English
@Theo_102_ @Shehu478392 Enough with your pattern matching.
What part of the context mentions muhammad or arabia?
English
@nevergiveup2o @Shehu478392 How about we change the topic to you misrepresenting my position as to what is seen?
Muhammad is connected by the book, the seal, the protest, and illiteracy.
English
@Theo_102_ @Shehu478392 Oh right!
First Muhammad, then Daniel/Revelation, now the quran correcting the cross.
Is it time to change topic, since we can see muhammad has nothing to do with Isaiah 29?
English
@nevergiveup2o @Shehu478392 Wrong, the unsealing of the book connects to Christian error about the crucifixion. The Quran has the solution to that error.
English