Zer02Her0

Why invest in Fact0rn? $FACT. Real Utility? Yes. FACT0RN's Proof-of-Useful-Work is a solid idea. Unlike Bitcoin's hash puzzles (which consume energy without any benefit beyond security), FACT0RN turns that energy into math that actually matters—factoring large numbers, which has

@AltcoinDaily Factor is digital academia $fact

Bitcoin is digital gold. Ethereum is digital oil. Solana is digital Nasdaq. XRP is digital SWIFT. Hyperliquid is digital Wall Street. Chainlink is digital middleware. Cardano is digital academia. BNB is digital exchange equity. Dogecoin is digital culture.

@CuriosityonX nolE

First city on Mars is about to be founded, and you get to name it. What's it going to be?

@zandyor Badly need

Tell me in 2 words why you need $200

@AltcoinDaily Speaking of math, try reading @ProjectFactor

I just re-ran the $TAO math and my jaw dropped

@BSCGemsAlert 27

Pick one random number from 1–75 for a surprise! 🐼 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 1 number hides a surprise! Winners will be picked in 24 hours. Follow me with notifications on & Comment your pick 👇

@Godsx2023 @newscientist @ProjectFactor has been doing this for a while.

Most online security today relies on public-key cryptography, especially systems like RSA Cryptography. These systems are secure because factoring very large numbers or solving discrete logarithm problems is extremely difficult for classical computers—it would take thousands of years with current technology. This is what protects online banking, emails, and secure messaging.

The maths problems that secure your online bank transactions and emails may soon be undermined by quantum technology. It’s imperative we act now, before it’s too late #Echobox=1776681470" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">newscientist.com/article/252212…

@jessepollak Factor in base

Base is for builders.

@OnepieceDcasual 🤦🤦🤦

#ONEPIECE1181 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭 I JUST FUCKING REALIZED!! Gaban (🐐) is now the only person alive in OP to know the WHOLE TRUTH of the fucking verse > Void Century > D Clan > The One Piece > Joyboy / Nikka > IMU Yeah major 🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩 WE NEED TO PROTECT UNC 😤😤

@CoinMarketCap @ProjectFactor $FACT 10000%

Tag a project you trust 1000%

@fujimotosloyal @ClairvoyantEye1 Maybe Imuu is the man marked by flames. 🤔 The "omen"

@ClairvoyantEye1 we got imu reveal before man mark by flames plot device man introduced to drawn out this story even more

#OnePiece1180 So the man marked by flames is definitely someone Imu burned with this black flame right?

@MrGallaxia @PlanetX Cant dm you

Keep messaging if your from Philippines and would love to earn creating content about @PlanetX Group is filling fast

@MrGallaxia How? Want to be a part of what you are doing

We’re going to takeover Philippines Players extracting Pesos daily and sharing it to Facebook Millions of views ⏰

@Justin_Bons If you have some time may i intoduce you to $FACT @ProjectFactor just read the paper.

Bittensor is a crypto-ponzi; unsustainable nonsense! TAO has no utility or PMF; it is all driven by token inflation: $328M worth of new tokens are printed annually, yet only $15M in annual revenue was generated! Subsidies from holders pay for subnets; economically bankrupt: 🧵 Token inflation is used to give people the illusion of low cost. As the truth is that creating AI models in a "decentralized" way is far more expensive. While offering no additional utility or benefits It is all theatre; subnets are not created as competitive products. They are created simply to exist & extract as much value out of TAO investors as possible Ponzinomics & Extraction: For example, the Pine Analytics data proved that unsubsidized inference on the Chutes subnet would cost up to 3.5x as much as centralized competitors such as Deepseek or TogetherAI! What makes it all so much worse is that token holders pay for these subnets through inflation. Yet, none of the revenue actually flows back to the token holders. The subnet owners get to keep 100% of the revenue! On top of 18% of emissions, just because... That is a borderline scam, extremely profitable for subnet operators, but setting up token investors for extreme loss when the system inevitably collapses As TAO has a 21M supply limit, which might be appealing to ignorant token investors. But also implies that the network will entirely collapse, as it is fundamentally unsustainable, just like BTC Inefficient & Expensive: The problems run even deeper than that, as is the case with most DePin projects that rely on subsidies rather than real-world value accrual: The reason why decentralized computing is so inefficient is that it requires verification & replication. Within a trustless environment, we cannot simply trust the work done by individual nodes. Instead, the work must be replicated multiple times over, introducing extreme inefficiencies. This is not so bad for simple TX's, but for serious, large computing tasks, this becomes a deal breaker This is why 41% of the rewards go to "validators" whose sole task is to verify that the work being done is legitimate! This only adds to the massive inefficiency already introduced by latency within a distributed network. There are several good reasons why AIs are trained in massive data centers with cards equipped with extremely low-latency, high-bandwidth connections. Something TAO is unable to directly compete with in technical & economic terms Product Theatre: In some cases, it is worth paying a premium for decentralization; one example of this is decentralized storage However, this is not the case for the training of AI's, as this is a one-off cost usually carried out by a centralized for-profit organization. As running the AI itself is much cheaper & even achievable by individuals on a single consumer-grade machine... So, what is the incentive for this centralized organization to use a more expensive method? That does not even result in a commercially viable product, due to the lack of scale... The answer is that there is no legitimate incentive! As there are only so many people they can fool into such a ponzinomic scheme, creating an upper bound on the size these subnets can grow to, which is nowhere near what large centralized AI companies can achieve today Conclusion: There is no future in such a bankrupt design! It is all theatre to extract as much as possible; subnets are not created as competitive products. They are created simply to exist & to extract as much value out of token investors as possible! There is much I did not cover in this critique, including "decentralization theatre", modularity, bad governance, perverse incentives & terrible UX. This critique was purely economic, which is bad enough to reject TAO on that basis alone! As value investors, we have to avoid such nonsense. It is not only dangerous from an investment perspective, but it also harms the industry as a whole. The more we prop up nonsense like this, the more difficult it will be for outsiders to take our industry seriously That is why we must speak out, as we care about crypto's ultimate goals. Financial freedom, censorship resistance, privacy & more Reject the nonsense, as the numbers & facts speak for themselves. Crypto already presents us with such a beautiful dream for the future; let's not spoil our opportunity by wasting our energy on half-baked ideas like TAO Crypto deserves better than that. So, help us spread this message far & wide. As the truth will set us free! 🔥

@CryptoWizardd Send me 100 and ill remember you 😂

Reminder Death will come on an ordinary day, in the middle of unfinished plans, and the world will continue without you. Your luxury cars, watches will be worth nothing. But its your good deeds that will be remembered so dont forget the ones in need 💙🫶 WIZZ

@ProjectFactor Yes $FACT to $ETH will bring more access to the masses 💯

Roadmap update: FACTOR → Ethereum. We’ve officially added an Ethereum bridge to the roadmap. This opens new opportunities for liquidity, DeFi integration, cross-chain utility, ecosystem growth, and broader access to FACTOR. A bigger, more connected future starts here. #Eth @ethereum #ether

@ProjectFactor We believe in Factor just like the people in btc in the early days, no one accept it because they dont understand it yet. $FACT $BTC $TAO

FACTOR was not just a project built alongside my blockchain research. It was the first real-world implementation of the theory of blockchain I began developing in 2021 — the same theory that evolved into Blockchain from First Principles. The project sharpened the theory. The theory strengthened the project. The book is now live for presale on Amazon. If you value rigor over hype, share it. amazon.com/dp/B0GHYWBM5P

@david_eng_mba @Cointelegraph Maybe @ProjectFactor @JuanDCifra could help.

From Grok: This in not true. "What Google officially published is this: Google’s 2025 result was about RSA-2048, not Bitcoin. Their estimate said RSA-2048 could theoretically be broken in under a week with fewer than 1 million noisy qubits. Bitcoin relies on elliptic-curve cryptography over secp256k1, which is a different problem."

🚨 BIG: Google research shows a future quantum computer could crack Bitcoin's private keys in just 9 mins, 1 min short of Bitcoin's average block time. The research warns mempool attacks could become a real threat, urging immediate migration to post-quantum cryptography.

RT if you enjoy watching Kawhi Leonard and Darius Garland play basketball