Kiki Explores The Galaxy

Crypto lending has stalled at just 10% of its 2022 peak. Blend is here to unlock the remaining 90% of untapped liquidity with secure, transparent, and efficient borrowing and lending—bringing institutions into the full potential of the DeFi and Radix Ecosystem. radixdlt.com/blog/introduci…

I had a conversation with @KonstantinKoos, and he mentioned @Radixdlt again. I don't have any yet, but I'm going to research their tech over the weekend. Somebody tell @Fuserleer we want to feature #Radix on the #ChainLeakPodcast. Let's make it happen! 🫶

@Ashcryptoreal dig into Radix XRD - seems like the right architecture to solve most of the problems that other L1s are struggling with (personal pov)

Dan @fuserleer and Eduard from @ThermeGroup are on stage discussing the Carbon Tokenomics Model @EBlockchainCon and explaining why Therme Group chose @radixdlt to implement this multi-billion dollar project. This initiative aims to target the visitor economy, with millions traveling daily, for calculating their carbon footprint and offsetting their carbon emissions by using Radix’s tech and scalability. #EBC10 #Radix $XRD

You may be well-stocked on infrastructure at the minute but you better believe we're gonna keep feeding it if means keeping you ahead of the curve. This one focuses on @radixdlt and its unique, full product suite, as well as the recently released bits that take it to the next level. If we expect the mass adoption of DeFi, the security risks and exploits that we half-brained degens accept as normal must be ironed out. @radixdlt is working on this by focusing on the Radix Engine. So we just published @LeftsideEmiri's article on the product, covering the underlying tech, finite state machines, and how the system enforces how assets should behave. This also covers Scrypto, the Blueprints Catalog, the developer royalty system, dApp scalability, and what's new with @radixdlt, including RadQuest, Foundry, Connect, AND the $XRD tokenomics. Aye, it's a long and technical one, but we said we'd be going down the Radix rabbit hole. So here's the start. 🔗 - blocmates.com/articles/what-…

🚨HELP @radixdlt GET LISTED ON @bitvavocom in 1 minute🚨 Steps Open your @bitvavocom app on your mobile, click on your account at the top right, scroll down a little and you'll see 'feedback' where you can request an asset. If you press that you can just search and request Radix.✔️ Thanks in advance!🥰

3 billion #swaps completed in 2h 45m! 🔥 Averaging about 400,000 per SECOND!😎 Only 88 failed, all systems green! ✅ #radix #cassie $xrd #crypto #blockchain #defi

@RTelford_invest Understand the difficulty but it would be the most sensible thing to communicate. Most car accidents are caused by right handes people, but that means nothing. Would be good to gain some background on the ‘89% of 10 baggers come from microcaps slogan’.

@nimda6 In 2014 the universe had ~2500 stocks, so base rates in just selecting a 10X+ stock is slim, the entire group that is 52/2500 = 2%. Small and micros combined about 1%.

@RTelford_invest Your percentages add up to 100%, but do not give information on base rates: are chances higher to get a 10 bagger when blindly selecting from largecaps or microcaps. That is: the percentage of 10 baggers within each category is more helpful for deciding where to fish.

@nimda6 Not sure what you mean, the chart above shows % of each size class, % large caps vs % microcaps etc

True native identity will be just as important to Web3 and DeFi in the end as true native assets. Here’s a piece I wrote about Radix’s approach: radixdlt.com/blog/radix-the…

Hitting some big numbers now & #cassie joins the very exclusive "100,000k+ #tps protocols" club!😎 #radix $xrd #crypto

@KonstantinKoos @IvanOnTech @AltcoinDailyio @coinbureau #bitvavo: Talking Dutch #crypto means talking @bitvavocom

As $XRD gets the recognition it deserves, thanks to prominent players in the field, such as @IvanOnTech, @AltcoinDailyio, @coinbureau etc. the demand of new exchange listings increased drastically. Which exchanges would you love to see $XRD listed on?

@Justin_Bons @Slammer_xrd In Radix's sharding design all transactions are cross-shard -- shards are a different beast in Radix, just tiny data units, not subnetworks. Radix theory and testing confirms unlimited linear scalability. x.com/fuserleer/stat… reddit.com/r/Radix/commen…

Solana is broken; it fails to meet demand! Before leaving crypto, try other chains! Here are all L1s in the top 100 based on decentralization & scalability:🧵 BTC - Low capacity❌ BNB - Centralized❌ ETH - At capacity & centralized L2s❌ SOL - At capacity (parallelization)❌ XRP - Centralized❌ DOGE - Low capacity❌ TON - High capacity (sharding)✅ ADA - Low capacity❌ AVAX - Has capacity✅ BCH - High capacity (simple)✅ DOT - Has capacity✅ TRON - Has capacity✅ NEAR - High Capacity (sharding)✅ ICP - Has capacity✅ LTC - Low capacity❌ APT - High capacity (parallelization)✅ ETC - Low capacity❌ FIL - Has capacity✅ ATOM - Has capacity✅ XLM - Centralized❌ HBAR - Centralized❌ VET - Centralized❌ KAS - High capacity (simple DAG)✅ FTM - High capacity (DAG)✅ XMR - Has capacity✅ TIA - Low capacity❌ SUI - High capacity (parallelization)✅ ALGO - Centralized❌ SEI - High capacity (parallelization)✅ BSV - High capacity (simple)✅ EGLD - High capacity (sharding)✅ XEC - High capacity (simple)✅ QNT- Has capacity✅ WLD - Has capacity✅ NEO - Centralized❌ XTZ - High capacity (sharding)✅ EOS - High capacity (parallelization)✅ MINA - Low capacity❌ KAVA - Has capacity✅ IOTA - Centralized❌ KSC - Has capacity✅ A harsh truth distilled in a few words for each chain, as you either have the capacity or not To explain my methodology: Anything below 100 TPS is low capacity, anything above 1k TPS is high capacity. TPS is counted based on how many simple 1 to 1 TXs fit within a single block Any blockchain with permissioned elements is considered "centralized," deal with it! In brackets, I also highlight what scaling tech is being used, as the truth is that it is not possible to scale a blockchain without using some sort of exotic tech The exception is "simple" chains; without Turing complete smart contracts, no exotic scaling tech is required at all Sharding remains my favorite approach, as the upper limit can exceed 1M TPS! Parallelization has a lower total capacity but is significantly faster DAGs are theoretically infinitely scalable but come with other trade-offs, such as more difficulty in tracking a single global state Ultimately, we want cryptocurrency to succeed & it can only succeed if it is scalable. The recent failures in SOL are disappointing, which makes it all the more important to drive this message home hard Blockchains can scale to meet demand despite the recent growing pains!

@Justin_Bons twitter.com/i/spaces/1OwxW…

ETH has 10x the capacity of BTC SOL has 10x the capacity of ETH Why is it so difficult to get people to recognize technological progress? The answer lies in their bags Sharded chains such as TON, NEAR & EGLD have 10x the capacity of SOL; instead of denial, SOL is scaling more!

@MadsEberhardt FYI -- ecosystem seems to be emerging radixdlt.com/blog/momentum-…

4/6) From the perspective of users, sharding is far less complex! This is how it should be; core developers who think sharding is too difficult should be fired & replaced! To counter the misinformation: You cannot attack individual shards & composability is built in natively!

6/6) We now have chains that are sharded or are close to implementing it; support these heroes: TON, NEAR, EGLD, XTZ, XRD, SHM & more! Sharded chains will achieve 1M+ TPS without sacrificing decentralization The blockchain trilemma has been solved, wake up & smell the roses!