nivek | Google Dev Expert • Angular
4K posts

nivek | Google Dev Expert • Angular
@nivekcode
Helping developers build scalable, high-quality Angular applications with modern web technologies. Google Developer Expert (Angular & Web).
Switzerland Katılım Eylül 2015
430 Takip Edilen6K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet

@nivekcode @AngularUniv @angular Towards the form: yes. But if the form is reactive and you want to immediatly (or after a debounce) write back to the store, it has not worked directly so far.
English

This is a game-changer for modern, reactive @angular: a linked signal can now write back to its source of truth. The logic for this is defined when setting up the linked signal.
Impressive, how small changes make a huge impact.
github.com/angular/angula…
English

@ManfredSteyer @AngularUniv @angular 👍 but wasnt this already possible with linkedSignals that dont write back to source? whats the benefit of writing back to source in this case?
English

@nivekcode @AngularUniv @angular My main use case is signal forms that display data from a store. The store gives me read-only signals (which is good), and the form needs a writable signal.
English

@SimonHoiberg What do you mean with doors are closing soon? 10 millions initiative?
English

If you're a founder and a dad, you should move to Switzerland 🇨🇭
- Low taxes
- Top quality of living
- Family friendly
- Clean and calm
- Amazing nature
And the doors are closing soon!
Go to Switzerland. Get into debt if you have to.

Simon Høiberg@SimonHoiberg
Even Elon Musk is Swissmaxxing now 🇨🇭
English

@Jean__Meche @pankajparkar 🤩 nice, will the update schematics automatically remove on push from all on push components and add default to all the others?
English

We've talked about it recently, but the work is finally done and the feature is merged!
In v22 OnPush is the default for CD!
Less boilerplate and more happy developers 😄
github.com/angular/angula…
English

@DanielGlejzner let him do it himself if its so simple
English
nivek | Google Dev Expert • Angular retweetledi

As Inwas reading the comments, I still find it strange to see the
“use #Angular only for large projects / big teams where you need structure else it’s overkill”
argument floating around.
Since when is structure an enterprise-only feature?
What’s the alternative, intentional spaghetti?
Angular is very lightweight nowadays, You get everything out of the box without installing a gazillion third-party libraries just to cover basics like routing.
Also Angular doesn't give you arch out of the box, just building blocks like 1st class support for lazy loading of routes and components,
if you wanna arch you need something like eslint-plugin-boundaries
Enea Jahollari 🅰@Enea_Jahollari
Good comments about @angular in Reddit 💯 #angular reddit.com/r/webdev/comme…
Zurich, Switzerland 🇨🇭 English

@kentcdodds do you still write code by hand these days?
English

🚨 New Article dropped! #Angular Signal Form Essentials
Learn all the Angular Signal Form basics in under 10 minutes!

English

lol, this is actually my native tongue 😅
m 🧚🏻♀️@spelunky_
took 5 years of german in school & i still only understood like 5 words in this interview
English

Subscribe to our newsletter to not miss it: angularexperts.io/blog
English





