notamarxist

21.6K posts

notamarxist banner
notamarxist

notamarxist

@nmarks171

🐢🗽🇺🇲🇮🇱

Narnia Katılım Eylül 2019
5.7K Takip Edilen974 Takipçiler
notamarxist
notamarxist@nmarks171·
While the Church does not mandate a belief in Zionism one way or the other, it provides the theological building blocks—specifically the 'Irrevocable Covenant'—that allow a Catholic to support the Jewish claim to the land as a matter of personal, faithful conviction.
English
0
0
1
10
notamarxist
notamarxist@nmarks171·
????
Derek. 🇺🇸@SuitablePolitic

Most people have figured out that Iran was very unlikely to just say "The Strait is wide open!! Sorry!! Please don't bomb my power plants!" What always trips people up is that they assume Trump doesn't know that. That he actually believes the IRGC will just bend over backwards. It's a common mistake at lower levels of chess. Assessing your own options, comparatively, is the easy part. But assessing your opponent's options accurately? That's the hard part. Trump is extremely good at that. It's why he's so good in negotiations and foreign policy. (Aka negotiations with guns and bombs) Most analysts aren't very good at that. They aren't looking at the board from Trump's perspective. Let's do that here. You issue that ultimatum. You have to assume that you'll have to make good on your threat. You bomb the power plants using the graphene bombs that will disrupt electricity for the next 24 or so hours. Why the hell do you want the lights shut off for 24 hours? Most people assume it's either neutral or negative to regime change. They assume that because it's the opposite of how we conducted ourselves in instances like the Arab Spring or that Ukraine kerfuffle. But the Arab Spring approach was always off the table. They banned the internet. We have ways around that, but nowhere near enough circumvention to actually coordinate a revolution. So, how the hell were we planning to do it? I'd be using the living hell out of CIA Operations Officers, MOSSAD Officers, and probably even ODA's. (A contingent of highly trained Special Forces.) In order to give those guys operational freedom, I'd have made sure to disassemble the IRGC until they were a scattered mess of loosely organized soldiers that lack the capacity for robust counterintelligence. Oh, right, that's what we've been doing from Day 1 of Epic Fury. These guys would be able to communicate with each other even after the lights go out. At least within their various units and networks. But once the lights go out? The regime loses its technological advantage over the insurgents. The scattered mess of the IRGC will no longer be able to communicate with nearly enough precision to defend themselves from several attacks simultaneously. Can we field several attacks simultaneously? Of course! That's how the CIA largely runs intelligence networks nowadays. We've essentially borrowed the best pieces of how terror cells operate. On-the-ground autonomy. Everyone is structuring and planning a separate attack that no central command will have to green light. They've been given a collective go signal. When the lights go out. You go. They've been given 48 hours to make final preparations for whatever plans they have in store. They'll be given a 24 hour window where the enemy is blind, deaf, and dumb. At that point, the regime will have to defend itself from a thoroughly established ground force made predominantly from the protestors they'd have wished to kill. And then, as they dig in their heels for the fight right in front of their face? Tripoli descends upon their flank and we seize Kharg Island, cutting off the IRGC's ability to fund its own defense.

QST
0
0
1
21
notamarxist retweetledi
Pope Respecter
Pope Respecter@poperespecter1·
Protestants dismiss Jesus naming Peter "Rock" by saying there's a variation in the Greek and Jesus calls Peter "petros" but Rock is "Petra". Greek scholars dismiss this. But so does John 1:42. St. John states that Peter is a translation of "Cephas" which simply means Rock.
Pope Respecter tweet media
English
66
42
653
17.9K
notamarxist
notamarxist@nmarks171·
Pro-tip: "The Word" in John 1:1 is Logos (a Living Person). The word for "Scripture" is Graphe (written text). Jesus didn't become a book; the Word became flesh. The Greek makes a clear distinction between the Source and the Script. 📜🔥
English
0
0
1
16
notamarxist
notamarxist@nmarks171·
@McBrideLawNYC @BishopBarron There is no official teaching (i.e., no definitive magisterial doctrine) affirming or denying that the Jewish people have a divine right to possess the land of Israel (the modern state) in the present day due to God's biblical promises.
English
0
0
1
157
Joe McBride
Joe McBride@McBrideLawNYC·
THE MODERN NATION OF ISRAEL DOES NOT REPRESENT THE FULFILLMENT OF BIBLICAL PROPHECY AND HENCE DOES NOT STAND BEYOND CRITICISM! SORRY EVANGELICALS!!! Thank you, @BishopBarron !
Joe McBride tweet media
English
197
472
3.5K
38.6K
notamarxist
notamarxist@nmarks171·
@EudaimoniaEsq There is no official teaching (i.e., no definitive magisterial doctrine) affirming or denying that the Jewish people have a divine right to possess the land of Israel (the modern state) in the present day due to God's biblical promises.
English
2
0
4
1.1K
𝐄𝐮𝐝𝐚𝐢𝐦𝐨𝐧𝐢𝐚
“The Catholic position on matters of ‘Zionism’…is as follows:…the modern nation of Israel does not represent the fulfillment of Biblical prophecies and hence does not stand beyond criticism.” Bishop Barron stating in plain terms what everyone with a shred of reading comprehension has been saying for weeks—for months, years, and decades, actually.
Bishop Robert Barron@BishopBarron

Over the past several weeks, Carrie Prejean Boller has complained that she was removed from the Presidential Commission on Religious Liberty because of her Catholic beliefs, and she has called out myself and other Catholic members of the commission for not defending her. This is absurd. Mrs. Prejean Boller was not dismissed for her religious convictions but rather for her behavior at a gathering of the Commission last month: browbeating witnesses, aggressively asserting her point of view, hijacking the meeting for her own political purposes. The Catholic position on matters of “Zionism,” to which I fully subscribe, is as follows: all forms of antisemitism are to be unequivocally condemned; the state of Israel has a right to exist; but the modern nation of Israel does not represent the fulfillment of Biblical prophecies and hence does not stand beyond criticism. If Mrs. Prejean Boller were dismissed for holding these beliefs, it is difficult to understand why I am still a member of the Commission. To paint herself as a victim of anti-Catholic prejudice or to claim that her religious liberty has been denied is simply preposterous.

English
27
28
540
34.4K
notamarxist
notamarxist@nmarks171·
@BishopBarron By the way Bishop, the official teaching is that you can believe in some theological claim to the land as a matter of permitted theological opinion because there is no binding doctrine on it.
English
0
0
0
8
Bishop Robert Barron
Bishop Robert Barron@BishopBarron·
Over the past several weeks, Carrie Prejean Boller has complained that she was removed from the Presidential Commission on Religious Liberty because of her Catholic beliefs, and she has called out myself and other Catholic members of the commission for not defending her. This is absurd. Mrs. Prejean Boller was not dismissed for her religious convictions but rather for her behavior at a gathering of the Commission last month: browbeating witnesses, aggressively asserting her point of view, hijacking the meeting for her own political purposes. The Catholic position on matters of “Zionism,” to which I fully subscribe, is as follows: all forms of antisemitism are to be unequivocally condemned; the state of Israel has a right to exist; but the modern nation of Israel does not represent the fulfillment of Biblical prophecies and hence does not stand beyond criticism. If Mrs. Prejean Boller were dismissed for holding these beliefs, it is difficult to understand why I am still a member of the Commission. To paint herself as a victim of anti-Catholic prejudice or to claim that her religious liberty has been denied is simply preposterous.
Carrie Prejean Boller@CarriePrejean1

Your Excellency, you shared with me through text message to me that my position reflects Catholic teaching, especially that the modern state of Israel is not the fulfillment of Biblical prophecy. That is the position I expressed, and yet I was removed from the Religious Liberty Commission. Respectfully, it is difficult not to conclude that this commission does not truly care about religious liberty when a Catholic can be removed for faithfully articulating the Church’s teaching. Asking me to deny Catholic teaching in order to satisfy a political ideology is itself a violation of my religious freedom. As Pope Leo XIII warned, “To recoil before an enemy, or to keep silence when from all sides such clamor is raised against truth, is the part of a coward.” Whether I serve on this Commission or not, my voice will only grow louder for those being persecuted for their faith. I believe this appointment was ordained by God, and I will not abandon my Catholic faith to keep a position on a commission that has abandoned its mission. If my religious freedom is not protected, then no one’s is. Please speak up. Please stand up for Catholics. Be brave, Bishop Barron. The world needs brave men.

English
3.7K
3.2K
15.8K
3M
notamarxist
notamarxist@nmarks171·
There is no official teaching (i.e., no definitive magisterial doctrine) affirming or denying that the Jewish people have a divine right to possess the land of Israel (the modern state) in the present day due to God's biblical promises.
English
0
0
1
40
notamarxist
notamarxist@nmarks171·
@xPineBaron @israelcatholic @RealMattFradd Jimmy Akin writes that despite the Catholic Church's refusal to endorse Zionism on a theological basis, an individual Catholic opining that Jews have a right to the Land of Israel due to God’s promise is "within the realm of permitted theological speculation".
English
0
0
0
8
notamarxist
notamarxist@nmarks171·
@RealMattFradd Jimmy Akin writes that despite the Catholic Church's refusal to endorse Zionism on a theological basis, an individual Catholic opining that Jews have a right to the Land of Israel due to God’s promise is "within the realm of permitted theological speculation".
English
1
0
3
139
notamarxist retweetledi
Raven
Raven@raven_brah·
I got more enjoyment out of this clip than Villeneuve’s Dune films
English
112
1.5K
15.7K
944K
notamarxist retweetledi
U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops
Catholics are called to reject antisemitism and the lies and conspiracies that fuel it, and to stand clearly against hatred and violence directed toward our Jewish brothers and sisters. To defend religious freedom with integrity, we must also reject antisemitism. @ArchbishpSample @archdpdx Watch the full video at: ow.ly/sYF550Yw6cA
English
3.7K
2K
8.4K
1.8M
Josh Kraushaar
Josh Kraushaar@JoshKraushaar·
Abughazaleh is getting crushed in the Cook and Lake County suburbs. Evidence that Mamdani style leftism only has purchase in deep-blue cities and college towns.
English
225
301
3.5K
1.2M
notamarxist
notamarxist@nmarks171·
@ShaneSchaetzel Yeah, I agree. There's no binding dogmatic teaching one this issue, they're so that's why there's a variety of opinions on it. The problem is the politics bleeds into theology.
English
1
0
0
41
Shane Schaetzel †☧
Shane Schaetzel †☧@ShaneSchaetzel·
I disagree with him for ethical reasons, and that bleeds into theology. Look, Jimmy Akin is a damn good apologist, and I respect him. He knows his stuff. That said, he has the exact same magisterial authority that I do, which is zero. So you're talking to one lay apologist who disagrees with another lay apologist about a single issue that neither one of us have any control over. Take our words for what they are worth.
English
1
0
3
45
Shane Schaetzel †☧
Shane Schaetzel †☧@ShaneSchaetzel·
+ I am Catholic. + I love traditional liturgy of all types. + I am an Integralist. + I do not believe the State of Israel has a divine right to exist. I put the State of Israel on the same level as Mexico, Canada, France and Palestine. They all have an equal right to exist under natural law but no more. + I think the current Zionist coalition government in the State of Israel is evil, especially Benjamin Netanyahu, and needs to be democratically replaced. I am calling for something akin to the Labor coalition that existed in the 1990s under Yitzak Rabin. And I am calling for Israel to return to its pre-1967 borders, while an international coalition (Trump’s Board of Peace) sets up a Palestinian State. Many people, most especially Christian Zionists like Senator Ted Cruz, are calling people like me “antisemites,” for believing these things. Guess what? We don’t care anymore. Call us whatever you like. You can’t stop us anymore, and you can’t win elections without us anymore. So learn to cope.
English
39
94
518
15.9K
Shane Schaetzel †☧
Shane Schaetzel †☧@ShaneSchaetzel·
@nmarks171 I disagree with Jimmy Akin on this for ethical reasons, when we consider the problems associated with Israeli expansionism into the West Bank and the ethnic cleansing of Gaza.
English
1
0
0
188
Jimmy Borgir
Jimmy Borgir@BorgirJim·
@JoshKraushaar Go fuck yourself, Israel is taking over American elections just to have Americans still stay Pro Israel. Fuck AIPAC.
English
9
0
5
668
tran de aragua
tran de aragua@coffeepotdome·
@JoshKraushaar it's almost as if a foreign country spent tens of millions of dollars in this race
English
10
1
235
5.4K
notamarxist
notamarxist@nmarks171·
@_Revelation_20 @PstrAThomas Because the Church has not issued a definitive, infallible ruling on whether modern geopolitical events fulfill biblical prophecy, Catholics are free to speculate that the Jews have a theological claim to Israel.
English
0
0
0
10
Revelation20
Revelation20@_Revelation_20·
The Church does not replace Israel; Gentile believers are grafted into the promises while waiting for God to finish His specific work with His ancient people (Rom. 11:25-26).
English
342
116
875
47.4K