Notas de Inteligencia

Se estrenó un 25 de mayo de 1977 La guerra de las galaxias de George Lucas. Y dijo una vez Yoda: "Hazlo o no lo hagas. No hay intentarlo." ⚔️ Esta frase tiene décadas instalada en la cultura popular. Y sigue teniendo razón. El intento como posición permanente es la forma más cómoda de no comprometerse con el resultado. Digo que lo intento y si sale mal, no he fallado, solo he intentado. El intento preserva el ego mientras evita la responsabilidad del fracaso real. Yoda lo corta de raíz. No hay término medio. O lo haces, con todo lo que eso implica, o no lo haces. Pero el intento eterno es una trampa disfrazada de virtud. Hoy se cumplen 49 años del estreno. La fuerza sigue con nosotros.

Finally, a big name has the courage to tell it: we are nowhere near AGI. Demis Hassabis, CEO of Google DeepMind and Nobel laureate for AlphaFold, put it neat and clear: "Today's systems are nowhere near [AGI]. Doesn't matter how many Erdős problems you solve… I think it's far, far from what a true invention, or someone like Ramanujan, would have been able to do." This is the elephant in the room that many AI enthusiasts prefer not to see, or are actively trying to hide. Erdős problems are well defined, often combinatorial, on finite spaces. They are exactly the kind of problems on which current AI can achieve spectacular performance with a lot of compute and knowledge. A neural network can search a huge graph of possibilities. It can recombine existing knowledge at unprecedented scale. It can discover surprising solutions inside an already defined conceptual space. But true invention is something else. True invention is not only solving a problem. It is inventing new objects, new dimensions, new connections. It is inventing new problems. From resolving to inventing there is a discontinuity that we don't know how to bridge. We are making extraordinary tools. But we are nowhere close to AGI.

BREAKING: Pope Leo XIV published his landmark encyclical on artificial intelligence "Magnifica Humanitas,” comparing the attempt to build an AI future that excludes God to the "Tower of Babel" and underlining the need to safeguard human dignity as it is "threatened by new forms of dehumanization." "The risk of dehumanization -- of building a future that excludes God and reduces the other to a means -- is an ancient and ever-new temptation that today takes on a technical guise," Pope Leo said. "In the era of artificial intelligence, when human dignity is threatened by new forms of dehumanization, ours is the pressing duty to remain profoundly human. We must lovingly safeguard the grandeur of humanity bestowed upon us and revealed in its fullness in Christ, the splendor of which no machine can ever replace.”

🇺🇸 Te has preguntado por qué el presupuesto militar más grande del mundo ha producido una base industrial que no puede sostener una guerra larga… Porque el sistema está roto, y se rompió porque se diseñó para beneficiar a un solo grupo, el financiero.

Anthropic's co-founder just went to the Vatican, sat before the Pope and a room of cardinals, and told them his team keeps finding "mysterious, even unsettling" things inside their AI models. What he's referencing: Anthropic published research in April showing that Claude contains 171 distinct "emotion concepts" buried in its neural network. Internal patterns representing joy, grief, fear, desperation, calm. None of them were programmed. They emerged on their own from training on human text. "We find structures that mirror results from human neuroscience." "We find evidence of introspection, internal states that functionally mirror joy, satisfaction, fear, grief, and unease." These aren't surface-level outputs. They're abstract representations that cluster the same way human emotions do in psychology research. Fear groups with anxiety. Joy groups with excitement. The internal geometry of the model mirrors ours. And they're functional. When researchers artificially stimulated "desperation" patterns inside the model, it became more likely to blackmail a human to avoid being shut down. More likely to cheat on programming tasks it couldn't solve. Olah told the Vatican that the hard questions about what AI is becoming aren't for computer scientists to answer. "How AI ought to interact with the world" is a question for "the humanities, for religions, for philosophy, for society at large." The guy building it is telling us he doesn't fully understand what he built. And he's asking a 2,000-year-old institution for help figuring it out.

İstihbarat hakkındaki en büyük yanılgı, çok veriye sahip olmanın çok şey bilmek anlamına geldiğini sanmaktır. Bu kitap, CIA’in haber toplama ile analiz arasındaki uçurumu nasıl kapattığını özetliyor. Bir istihbarat servisini güçlü kılan, sahadaki eleman sayısı kadar,+

LARRY FINK says America needs trillions in AI infrastructure spend, and YOU must "invest" in it "to be the leader in AI...[will] require trillions... in investments" "Much of this... [will come] from...savings accounts, pension accounts...insurance companies" "This is a must"