nsoybean

191 posts

nsoybean banner
nsoybean

nsoybean

@nshawbin

👋 Building. Github: https://t.co/16EQJSDH3z

Katılım Şubat 2013
216 Takip Edilen47 Takipçiler
nsoybean
nsoybean@nshawbin·
2. Solostack: Local-first runtime for managing an AI company with agents, orchestration, git workflows, and CLI-driven execution. Uses your own claude/codex subscription. github.com/nsoybean/solos…
English
2
0
1
36
nsoybean
nsoybean@nshawbin·
Open sourcing all my AI projects that i have done over the past 1.5 years
nsoybean tweet media
English
1
0
0
12
nsoybean
nsoybean@nshawbin·
First time in an autonomous car in Guangzhou, China 🇨🇳 Going at 40mph and frequent lane changing is not something I’m expecting 😂
English
0
0
0
33
nsoybean
nsoybean@nshawbin·
One week break from coding 😮‍💨
nsoybean tweet media
English
0
0
0
11
nsoybean
nsoybean@nshawbin·
For those building agents, what’s a challenge that you can’t solve with existing solution? I’m happy to try and build them 👷‍♂️
English
1
0
1
30
agrim singh @ ai engineer world fair
i built the fastest pdf parser available (and it's OSS!) glyphrush: 400+ pages/sec, and every page it can't fully handle comes back flagged - requires_ocr, layout_uncertain, table_uncertain - instead of silently broken text. benchmarked against @llama_index's liteparse aka the "world's fastest PDF parser" on its own benchmark design, same machine, warm and cold. glyphrush is faster in every cell: 2.26× vs its no-OCR mode, 110× vs its defaults - while passing the same 9/9 quality gates on 8,624 labeled checks. built with @cursor_ai @ericzakariasson @leerob
agrim singh @ ai engineer world fair tweet media
English
7
9
43
3.9K
nsoybean
nsoybean@nshawbin·
@zachlloydtweets do you think this replaces workflows with deterministic scripts as verification gates? since now its purely based on verifier agent evaluating the claims of coding agent
English
0
0
0
5
nsoybean
nsoybean@nshawbin·
If you use /loop or /goal for long-running agent sessions: how do you verify the agent actually did the thing, vs. narrated doing it? /goal's evaluator uses a small model to judge the conversation, not the diff, nor run deterministic scripts Curious what people's setups are — hooks? CI? manual review?
nsoybean tweet media
English
0
0
0
17
nsoybean
nsoybean@nshawbin·
Building a running route planner and hit a wall 🧱 @OneMap_sg only supports walking/cycling/car modes - so the routes cut straight through HDB blocks. Not exactly the vibe for a morning run. Any SG devs found a workaround for runner-friendly routing? 👟
nsoybean tweet media
English
0
0
0
202
Brian Chew
Brian Chew@brianchew·
i remember the first time i came across vim and 🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮 :wq! !!!!!!!!!! (sorry vim people)
English
3
0
0
243
nsoybean
nsoybean@nshawbin·
I like this answer. Basically, in my own understanding is trying to systemize your process. Up until recently people have been defining their workflow for building feature X. I would think the idea now is to move one level up, and come up with higher level workflow to handle X, without knowing in advance what is X. Eg. If it’s a bug, it will be reproduce, write test, build, run test, review etc. If it’s feature request, then another flow etc
English
0
0
0
30
Hridoy Reh
Hridoy Reh@hridoyreh·
Indie hackers run boring sites. They are making $1.7M+ per month. 12 boring websites:
English
18
30
428
124.2K