
It’s hard enough to take seriously anyone using the phrase “trans genocide” even without the claim that it’s facilitated by watching a popular kids’ show
doppelnull
7.1K posts

@nullwesen
Leidenschaftlicher Programmierer/🏳️🌈Queer🏳️🌈/Autist/only 18/Every time i try something that seems impossible my heart skips a beat/22 Jahre alt/they it

It’s hard enough to take seriously anyone using the phrase “trans genocide” even without the claim that it’s facilitated by watching a popular kids’ show

built in emote and has no facial expressions at all😶

there needs to be retribution for this. every single action has a person with a name and a face who must be punished.

🚨🇺🇸BREAKING: SUPREME COURT JUST SAVED YOUR INTERNET BILL Ever downloaded or streamed something you probably shouldn’t have? Your internet provider just got some major legal protection - and so did you. Here’s what happened. Sony, Warner, Universal and 50+ music labels sued Cox Communications - one of America’s biggest internet providers - claiming Cox should be held responsible when its customers pirate music. They wanted $1.5 billion. Today, the Supreme Court said absolutely not. All 9 justices agreed. The logic is simple: Cox sells you internet access. What you do with it is on you - not them. Making internet providers responsible for every illegal thing a customer does online would mean cutting off entire households, coffee shops, hospitals and universities just because someone on the network pirated a song. The music industry is furious. Big Tech - Google, Amazon, Microsoft - is celebrating. Why it matters to you: if the labels had won, your internet provider could have been pressured to spy on your activity, throttle your speeds, or cut you off entirely based on accusations alone. No trial. No proof. Today’s ruling says that’s not how America works. Source: Supreme Court