English
Lvl 3 Mage
97 posts
@TheRealWizar The issue is that they would do it in UE5 and make it so poorly unoptimized that it runs at 30fps on a 5090 Stealth Ice for 4500 dollars.
English
@sachinyadav699 You would be fair in assuming that its some intentional thing given their track record of programming intentional arbitrary loading times depending on what browser you use. Just assume malice every time. You cannot attribute to stupidity that which IS malice.
English
@nummer12552 @PubWanghaf That is how you’d think if you couldn’t look at your life from 3rd person and see a trajectory of you in a world around you. If you’re just first person then time is literally just your experience in moments
English
@SucaLaMinkYa @PubWanghaf There's a video of a quite enthusiastic black woman openly explaining it. I wish I remembered what she was called, but like they genuinely think that "moments" are time. So like, if you do a thing thats memorable, its time. If you wait until smth happens, you are creating time.
English
@nummer12552 @PubWanghaf Is this for real? No wonder nothing works. You can’t pave a highway until everyone has a car.
English
@SucaLaMinkYa @PubWanghaf It's called "African Time" and while its kind of a romantic concept thats quite noble in some ways, it's just not how the modern world works. In Africa, if you get in a bus, you basically have to wait for the bus to be filled before itll drive. They call it "making time" to wait.
English
@PubWanghaf They were handed wells and couldn’t figure it out.
I don’t think many have a sense of the future and that’s why they don’t trade something now (work) for a better future.
English
@Lurktastique @AmerPhilo2025 Sure, but we're not gonna convince them that way, are we? They reject Christianity and its values outright. You have to convince them that even in their worldview, that only the conservative Christian position is congruent with anything, even reality.
English
@nummer12552 @AmerPhilo2025 That atheistic arguments may or may not exist is unrelated to whether or not Christian morality is objective. Christian morality is explicitly objective, as it believes in an existence of the ethics before, beyond, & above the human experience
English
This post has hit Twitter about as hard as the “how would you feel if you didn’t have breakfast this morning” era.
Whenever you debate on this website, remember this post and the asinine progressive inability to comprehend what’s happening. They truly cannot understand the world they live in, in the same way a deep sea fish cannot comprehend that it lives in water. It has never experienced air and so cannot even conceive of the idea.
This discrepancy is so deep that any attempt at serious philosophical reconciliation is impossible.
Rock Solid@ShitpostRock
The best logical fallacy to give an atheist when discussing morals is to ask them why it's morally wrong to have intercourse with roadkill It's dead it will not feel anything, nobody will know and there are no victims If you ask a Christian or Buddhist why it's morally wrong, they will tell you it's because the body retains inherent dignity as part of God's creation (or the sacred flow of life), and desecrating it violates divine/natural order, harms your soul/karma, and shows disrespect, even if no one feels it or knows An atheistic worldview of this question taken to its extreme, concludes that intercourse with roadkill is tantamount to masturbation and nothing more
English
@AmerPhilo2025 Ergo, the moral Atheist is conservative. Thats just how it is, I'm just the messenger-
GIF
English
@AmerPhilo2025 I think he lost me though when he made a follow-up post just outright claiming that Christian morality is objective. No, it is not. You CAN make Atheistic arguments, but the current secular liberal worldview is antithetical to any of those positions.
English
@soggycat9 @punishednuz Characters such as Kaworu and Ryoji were only able to make him blush because he was overwhelmed by their sexual aggressiveness, not because he is specifically gay
English
@soggycat9 @punishednuz Actually, this framing suggests that he is looking away from her out of embarassment and fear of her overwhelming sexuality, and that his mind is fixated on the sexual aspects of her body
English
several compositions in the first episode that caught my eye and conveyed a lot about what this show will be. this is definitely one of them lol
nuz@punishednuz
finally starting this show so i can catch the 30th anniversary screening of end of evangelion in theatres later this month. very excited
English
@Slypador He lost me actually when he claimed that Christian morality is objective. You CAN make atheistic moral claims, but they are only consistent if you also admonish LGBTQ and Abortion, which would expose the hypocrisy of the modern secular leftist.
English
every single moron calling rock solid disgusting for tweeting this while missing the entire point of his argument:
Rock Solid@ShitpostRock
The best logical fallacy to give an atheist when discussing morals is to ask them why it's morally wrong to have intercourse with roadkill It's dead it will not feel anything, nobody will know and there are no victims If you ask a Christian or Buddhist why it's morally wrong, they will tell you it's because the body retains inherent dignity as part of God's creation (or the sacred flow of life), and desecrating it violates divine/natural order, harms your soul/karma, and shows disrespect, even if no one feels it or knows An atheistic worldview of this question taken to its extreme, concludes that intercourse with roadkill is tantamount to masturbation and nothing more
English
@8EyedEel Simply saying morality is solely religious and that Christianity is objectively right is... yeah, it's retarded. He could have destroyed their position so much better but instead he made a caricature of the conservative position.
English
@8EyedEel He lost me when he claimed Christian morality is objective. You actually can make atheistic moral claims, but they would only be consistent/non-hypocritical if you also admonish things that hurt society such as abortion. The modern secular leftist can't do that.
English
The question is whether you find it morally wrong and why, not just personally disgusting
kate bush’s husband@airbagg3d
Sir we found a SECOND guy who would fuck roadkill if it weren’t for Christianity
English
@wil_da_beast630 But steelmanning him like this is a waste of time. Nobody will read this and he already made the caricatured take in his follow-up. Such a fucking retard.
English
@wil_da_beast630 Obviously you shouldn't. But for an atheist to be reasonablye able to take this non-religous moral stance, they would have to be consistent. Scientific and evolutionary and even utilitarian arguments would all mean you admonish LGBTQ/Trans/Abortion stances.
English
This is actually really stupid.
The answer is that humans have an evolved instinct - which varies in strength between people and across cultures - to find this disgusting. So, doing it would make a normal man feel disgusting, weak, and unable to obtain women. This instinct clearly developed for logical reasons: fucking rotting animal vaginas transmits disease, must be truly memorable in odor terms, etc.
This^, by the way, is all that "natural law" - one of the better Christian arguments - really means. Rules aren't (R)eal...you don't go to Abbadon for deer sex...but they are useful.
Rock Solid@ShitpostRock
The best logical fallacy to give an atheist when discussing morals is to ask them why it's morally wrong to have intercourse with roadkill It's dead it will not feel anything, nobody will know and there are no victims If you ask a Christian or Buddhist why it's morally wrong, they will tell you it's because the body retains inherent dignity as part of God's creation (or the sacred flow of life), and desecrating it violates divine/natural order, harms your soul/karma, and shows disrespect, even if no one feels it or knows An atheistic worldview of this question taken to its extreme, concludes that intercourse with roadkill is tantamount to masturbation and nothing more
English