oduola aderemi

3.1K posts

oduola aderemi

oduola aderemi

@oduolates

Katılım Mart 2009
165 Takip Edilen32 Takipçiler
oduola aderemi
oduola aderemi@oduolates·
@saintdominik @SodiqTade On July 2nd, 2025, Ralph Nwosu called a Press Conference attended by David Matk and told Nigerians yesterday he has resigned to pave the way for David Mark to take control of the party leadership. How did again signed this letter as the party Chairman on July 21st?
English
1
0
0
80
Domingo
Domingo@saintdominik·
@SodiqTade Has anyone seen this yet? How can the ruling party be this clannish?
Domingo tweet media
English
4
0
3
1.2K
Premier
Premier@SodiqTade·
The good part of this is that this will even make the coalition more popular among Nigerians.
English
46
492
1.8K
44.1K
oduola aderemi
oduola aderemi@oduolates·
@emmaikumeh INEC didn't interpret any law but executed a court ruling that contains "maintain status quo ante bellum".
English
0
0
0
90
oduola aderemi
oduola aderemi@oduolates·
@mrfestusogun And you are a lawyer? Is "Status quo" and "Status quo ante bellum" the same? Ìwọ ni kí o má ya ara ẹ ní weyrey.
Català
0
0
0
29
FESTUS OGUN
FESTUS OGUN@mrfestusogun·
REMOVING ADC LEADERSHIP FROM YOUR WEBSITE IS NOT “MAINTAINING STATUS QUO”. Ema ya ota mi ni weyrey nau😭 You people should not finish this country.
INEC Nigeria@inecnigeria

PRESS RELEASE INEC’S POSITION ON THE COURT OF APPEAL’S DECISION IN APPEAL NO. CA/ABJ/145/2026: SENATOR DAVID MARK V HON. NAFIU BALA GOMBE & ORS The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has received: A letter from the law firm of Suleiman Usman SAN & Co. dated 16th March, 2026, titled: “RE: NOTICE OF PENDING PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE FEDERAL HIGH COURT AND CAUTION AGAINST ANY PURPORTED RECOGNITION OF MR NAFIU BALA GOMBE AS ACTING NATIONAL CHAIRMAN OF THE AFRICAN DEMOCRATIC CONGRESS (ADC)” written on behalf of concerned stakeholders within the African Democratic Congress (ADC) A letter from the law firm of Summit Law Chambers also dated 16th March 2026 titled: “DEMAND FOR ENFORCEMENT OF THE ORDERS MADE BY THE COURT OF APPEAL, ABUJA DIVISION IN APPEAL NO: CA/ABJ/145/2026: SENATOR DAVID MARK V HON. NAFIU BALA GOMBE & 4 ORS” written on behalf of Hon. Nafiu Bala Gombe. While the letter from Suleiman Usman SAN & Co urged the Commission not to recognise Mr Nafiu Bala Gombe as acting National Chairman of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) on account of the pending Suit No. FHC/ABJ/CS/1819/2025: Hon. Nafiu Bala Gombe v. ADC & 4 Ors. before the Federal High Court, Abuja, where the question of the leadership of the Party (ADC) is presently being contested, the letter from Summit Law Chambers, on the other hand, attached the certified True Copy of the Judgment of the Court of Appeal in Suit No. CA/ABJ/145/2026: Senator David Mark v Hon. Nafiu Bala Gombe & Ors and requested the Commission to enforce the judgement of the Court of Appeal, including: Ceasing recognition of Senator David Mark and Ogbeni Rauf Aregbesola as National Chairman and National Secretary respectively of ADC; Removing their names from the Commission’s portal; and Refraining from dealing with or recognising any actions taken by them in respect of the party in line with the preservation orders made by the Court of Appeal. Subsequently, by another letter on the same subject matter dated 27th March, 2026, Summit Law Chambers alleged that the Commission had acted in disobedience of the Court of Appeal’s Orders by: i. Inviting Senator David Mark’s group to a political parties’ meeting held on Tuesday, 24th March, 2026; and ii. Monitoring a purported National Executive Committee meeting of that group. The solicitors (Summit Law Chambers) further drew the attention of the Commission to the Motion Ex-Parte and Motion on Notice filed by their client on 15th December, 2025, seeking to prevent the 1st Defendant (ADC) from holding any convention, congress, conference, or meeting and to stop INEC from attending, monitoring, observing or recognising any activities of the ADC. They accordingly requested INEC to invalidate the NEC meeting held by Senator David Mark's group on 25th March, 2026, remove the name of Senator David Mark's group from the INEC portal, stop recognising or acknowledging correspondence from them until the determination of the pending suit before the Federal High Court, Abuja and allow Hon. Nafiu Bala Gombe to take over the affairs of ADC pending the determination of the case, and that INEC should respect the orders of the Court of Appeal in Appeal No. CA/ABJ/145/2026. ORDERS OF THE COURT OF APPEAL In its judgement delivered on 12th March, 2026, the Court of Appeal dismissed the interlocutory appeal by Senator David Mark and made amongst others, the following Orders: “Finally, it is necessary to make preservatory orders to ensure that the subject matter of the dispute pending before the trial court is not prejudiced as Courts have inherent powers to control and regulate proceedings to ensure justice...

English
9
132
235
7.5K
oduola aderemi
oduola aderemi@oduolates·
@Olag0ke No convention but the Vice Chairman (North) took over immediately, according to the party's constitution, before NEC met and elected Yilwatda. Every party as succession arrangement in their constitution.
English
0
0
2
211
oduola aderemi
oduola aderemi@oduolates·
@danleety @woye1 It is like saying ANC members in exile didn't fight apartheid because they were outside South Africa. Tinubu was part of NADECO in exile.
English
0
0
0
12
Danleety
Danleety@danleety·
@woye1 I tend to believe what Baba Sule Lamido said about Tinubu, Omologo was never around during NADECO , he jumped in to reap where he did not sow , how can a person that fought Abacha now acts worse than the dictator
English
17
1
20
5.6K
Woye
Woye@woye1·
ADC factional Chair, His Excellency Nafiu Bala has written to INEC to recognize him As the Chairman in line with the judgement of the Court of Appeal that REJECTED Appeal of David Mark. 2: David Mark on his own filed the appeal. 3: REMEMBER: that David Mark was part of the June 12 annulment. He said “no to democracy then at the highest level”.
English
115
196
582
77.7K
oduola aderemi
oduola aderemi@oduolates·
@TundeAdejumo9 What is the "Status quo ante bellum" in this case? Nwosu led executive resigned, Mark led members took over, Bala is challenging the takeover by Mark. Is Status quo ante bellum not when Nwosu resigned, meaning ADC has no recognizable NWC?.
English
3
0
3
1K
NaijaAttorney
NaijaAttorney@TundeAdejumo9·
STATUS QUO ANTE BELLUM AND ITS APPLICATION IN THE ADC LEADERSHIP CASE The confusion here appears to arise from an imprecise appreciation of the meaning and scope of an order directing the maintenance of the “status quo ante bellum”. Status quo ante bellum has been defined as the state of affairs existing before the commencement of hostilities between the parties. In that sense, it may, in appropriate circumstances, be understood as requiring a reversion to the position that existed prior to the Defendant’s alleged wrongful act. For instance, where the complaint arises from the Defendant’s forcible takeover of the Plaintiff’s land, an order to maintain the status quo ante bellum may properly be taken to refer to the state of affairs that existed before that alleged takeover. According to INEC, its understanding of the meaning and scope of the Court of Appeal’s order directing the maintenance of the status quo ante bellum was that the names of the current members of the National Working Committee of the ADC, led by its Chairman and uploaded to its portal after the suit by Hon. Nafiu Bala Gombe was instituted at the Federal High Court, ought to be removed. With respect, it is difficult to see how such a step can properly fall within the permissible scope of an order of status quo ante bellum, regardless of how broadly its effect is conceived. In this case, Hon. Nafiu Bala Gombe contends that, as the Vice-Chairman of the ADC, and having not resigned from that office, he is entitled to assume the position of Chairman upon the resignation of Mr. Ralph Okey Nwosu. On that basis, he has approached the Federal High Court by way of a motion for interlocutory injunction, seeking to restrain the current Chairman and Secretary of the ADC from holding themselves out or acting in those capacities, including in their dealings with INEC. That application remains pending before the Federal High Court and has yet to be determined. By removing the names of the current members of the National Working Committee of the ADC, particularly that of the Chairman, INEC appears to have lent implicit support to the Plaintiff’s contention that, having not resigned his position, he is entitled to assume the chairmanship following the resignation of Mr. Ralph Okey Nwosu. That issue remains pending before the trial Court, and it is, with respect, inappropriate for INEC to take steps that touch on its merits, even on a provisional basis, in reliance on an order directing the maintenance of the status quo ante bellum made by the Court of Appeal. Furthermore, construing the Court of Appeal’s order directing the maintenance of the status quo ante bellum, which was intended to preserve the subject matter of the pending suit, so as to require the removal of the names of the current members of the National Working Committee of the ADC from INEC’s portal, effectively amounts to a resolution of the pending motion for interlocutory injunction in favour of Hon. Nafiu Bala Gombe, notwithstanding that the application remains undetermined before the trial Court. Indeed, it may even be contended that such an interpretation extends beyond the reliefs sought by Hon. Nafiu Bala Gombe in his motion for interlocutory injunction. From the facts available, the application is limited to restraining the current Chairman and Secretary of the ADC from holding themselves out or acting in those capacities, including in their dealings with INEC. It does not seek the removal of their names from INEC’s portal, much less the removal of the names of other members of the National Working Committee who are neither mentioned in the application nor joined as parties to the substantive suit. In my view, regardless of how broadly the meaning or effect of status quo ante bellum is conceived, it ought not to be interpreted in a manner that effectively resolves or lends validation to issues that remain contested and yet to be determined by the Court, an outcome INEC appears to have reached in this instance. INEC, in compliance with the Court of Appeal’s order of status quo ante bellum, should have simply maintained the existing state of affairs, leaving all names on its portal intact and refraining from any actions that might affect the merits of the pending suit or motion for interlocutory injunction. Any order for removal of names is properly within the purview of the trial Court, should it grant the motion for interlocutory injunction or the reliefs sought in the substantive suit. It is not for INEC to take such a step independently.
INEC Nigeria@inecnigeria

PRESS RELEASE INEC’S POSITION ON THE COURT OF APPEAL’S DECISION IN APPEAL NO. CA/ABJ/145/2026: SENATOR DAVID MARK V HON. NAFIU BALA GOMBE & ORS The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has received: A letter from the law firm of Suleiman Usman SAN & Co. dated 16th March, 2026, titled: “RE: NOTICE OF PENDING PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE FEDERAL HIGH COURT AND CAUTION AGAINST ANY PURPORTED RECOGNITION OF MR NAFIU BALA GOMBE AS ACTING NATIONAL CHAIRMAN OF THE AFRICAN DEMOCRATIC CONGRESS (ADC)” written on behalf of concerned stakeholders within the African Democratic Congress (ADC) A letter from the law firm of Summit Law Chambers also dated 16th March 2026 titled: “DEMAND FOR ENFORCEMENT OF THE ORDERS MADE BY THE COURT OF APPEAL, ABUJA DIVISION IN APPEAL NO: CA/ABJ/145/2026: SENATOR DAVID MARK V HON. NAFIU BALA GOMBE & 4 ORS” written on behalf of Hon. Nafiu Bala Gombe. While the letter from Suleiman Usman SAN & Co urged the Commission not to recognise Mr Nafiu Bala Gombe as acting National Chairman of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) on account of the pending Suit No. FHC/ABJ/CS/1819/2025: Hon. Nafiu Bala Gombe v. ADC & 4 Ors. before the Federal High Court, Abuja, where the question of the leadership of the Party (ADC) is presently being contested, the letter from Summit Law Chambers, on the other hand, attached the certified True Copy of the Judgment of the Court of Appeal in Suit No. CA/ABJ/145/2026: Senator David Mark v Hon. Nafiu Bala Gombe & Ors and requested the Commission to enforce the judgement of the Court of Appeal, including: Ceasing recognition of Senator David Mark and Ogbeni Rauf Aregbesola as National Chairman and National Secretary respectively of ADC; Removing their names from the Commission’s portal; and Refraining from dealing with or recognising any actions taken by them in respect of the party in line with the preservation orders made by the Court of Appeal. Subsequently, by another letter on the same subject matter dated 27th March, 2026, Summit Law Chambers alleged that the Commission had acted in disobedience of the Court of Appeal’s Orders by: i. Inviting Senator David Mark’s group to a political parties’ meeting held on Tuesday, 24th March, 2026; and ii. Monitoring a purported National Executive Committee meeting of that group. The solicitors (Summit Law Chambers) further drew the attention of the Commission to the Motion Ex-Parte and Motion on Notice filed by their client on 15th December, 2025, seeking to prevent the 1st Defendant (ADC) from holding any convention, congress, conference, or meeting and to stop INEC from attending, monitoring, observing or recognising any activities of the ADC. They accordingly requested INEC to invalidate the NEC meeting held by Senator David Mark's group on 25th March, 2026, remove the name of Senator David Mark's group from the INEC portal, stop recognising or acknowledging correspondence from them until the determination of the pending suit before the Federal High Court, Abuja and allow Hon. Nafiu Bala Gombe to take over the affairs of ADC pending the determination of the case, and that INEC should respect the orders of the Court of Appeal in Appeal No. CA/ABJ/145/2026. ORDERS OF THE COURT OF APPEAL In its judgement delivered on 12th March, 2026, the Court of Appeal dismissed the interlocutory appeal by Senator David Mark and made amongst others, the following Orders: “Finally, it is necessary to make preservatory orders to ensure that the subject matter of the dispute pending before the trial court is not prejudiced as Courts have inherent powers to control and regulate proceedings to ensure justice...

English
11
24
38
37.4K
Black Phoenix
Black Phoenix@femiblack·
@KruizeBoi @mrfestusogun I'm not a lawyer and I think you're wrong - status quo; is the state things were that caused for action to be brought. This was how many moons past people as adults argued about what "and" meant.
English
2
0
2
288
FESTUS OGUN
FESTUS OGUN@mrfestusogun·
Court ordered status quo. Yet, INEC has gone ahead to remove ADC interim leadership names. These names were uploaded way earlier before the filing of the vexatious Suit and even before the “cause of action”. So, how is “status quo” removing the names of ADC interim Leaders?
English
40
501
853
35.3K
oduola aderemi
oduola aderemi@oduolates·
@mrfestusogun Can you put dates to these events so that you get cleat understanding of INEC's action? Like the date when the suit was filed; the date ADC notify INEC; and the date INEC upload Mark's name.
English
0
0
0
180
oduola aderemi
oduola aderemi@oduolates·
@IU_Wakilii But he said he is the only one remaining after Nwosu and others resigned their positions.
English
0
0
0
393
Ayo-Elesho
Ayo-Elesho@Ayoelesho·
My opinion on this Baddy of Lasu donation issue is simple, and I don't care who gets annoyed because nobody dey feed my papa. First, Dickson has built a reputation for himself on and beyond this platform as one of the few guys who have honestly served as a custodian of people’s donations. Not once has he been credibly accused of mismanaging the donations entrusted to him, which have cumulatively run into hundreds of millions of naira. I don't believe that he will now, because of 19 million Naira, throw that reputation and trust reposed in him by the public to the winds. Yes, he could have miscalculated how much exactly was spent because he handles the donations of so many people alongside his personal life, but to conclude that he intended to steal your donations might be unfair to him. If someone doesn't have a history of theft and has even helped society in his own little way, coupled with the fact that he's not even poor, I think he should be given the benefit of clearing the air, which he and Dr Sina have now done. Now, Baddy of Lasu, I don't want to sound harsh, but I don't think you're very smart. And I'll tell you why. Growing up, our parents and other elders taught us that “before you call on people to assist you in lifting a heavy load, you must have also lifted it a bit”. As a creator on this platform, with over 100k followers, you must have been earning a minimum of 500 dollars bi-monthly for the last one year. This means, assuming that you are not currently paused, that in 2025 alone, you earned over 10k dollars. Let's even agree, for the purpose of this conversation that you earned half of that. Do you mean that you didn't save any money out of the 5k dollars, which you could have contributed to your own surgery, for your own benefit and convenience? This estimate excludes money that you must have made from influencing gigs. To now come and request 19 million Naira for your surgery without even telling us that you have at least 2 million Naira of your own to contribute is an insult not only to those who donated to your initial surgery, but to every person in Nigeria who needs as little as 1 million Naira to solve their health challenges, but are not getting any help while you're looking at getting about 40 million Naira combined for your own surgery. That's the only issue I have with you in this case, because had you contributed some money, people would have judged your case more favourably than they're now doing. So, try to also drop some money for your surgery because you can't expect people to carry 100% of your burdens for you every time. Dem no dey help person marry wife still help am fǔćk am.
Sir Dickson@Wizarab10

Having conferred with @the_beardedsina, it is time for @_belikebaddy to undergo surgery on his second leg after the successful operation on the right leg. Thank you all for your support in the first instance. We will be needing N19m for the second surgery. Please find the account number below. Raise am 👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽 0249219856 Wema bank Obadiah David Adedolapo Crypto: TDuMZ8gQGatymLEkkMCXgSqkuFoduXyBxd USDT TRC20

English
365
845
4.4K
496.7K
oduola aderemi
oduola aderemi@oduolates·
@Gbamila @BolajiADC No coalition adopted ADC please. Individuals decamped from their respective parties to ADC at different time. They didn't join ADC under one umbrella or as a group.
English
1
0
0
63
Bissy
Bissy@Gbamila·
@BolajiADC Lol. You guys are jesters. This existential threat has been with the ADC from day 1 that the coalition adopted the party. I have been wondering what the game plan was for you guys. It is a land mine with the potential to shut the coalition out at the very last minute
English
3
0
7
1.2K
Bolaji Abdullahi
Bolaji Abdullahi@BolajiADC·
APC'S DESPERATE PLAN UNCOVERED Yesterday, we disclosed a sinister plot by agents of the ruling APC government to pressure INEC into taking illegal action to destabilise our party, following the milestone movement of H.E. Rabiu Kwankwaso to the ADC. After meeting a brick wall with INEC, they have now changed tactics, but the objectives remain the same. Information reaching us this morning is that a public protest is being planned for tomorrow, Thursday, 2nd April, in Abuja, sponsored by a particularly notorious minister. Their expectation is that a protest will give oxygen to a case that is already suffocating in the courts under the weight of its own illegality. The plan is simple: a paid crowd, posturing as aggrieved party members, will take to the streets demanding “David Mark Must Go.” This, they hope, will create “public pressure” on the INEC Chairman to magically upgrade and recognise an individual who resigned his position and was subsequently expelled from the ADC, to the position of National Chairman of a party he no longer belongs to. The plan by the ruling APC government to hijack the leadership of the ADC, the only viable opposition party left in the country, is real. If anything, it has assumed a new level of desperation in the past few days. They are not just afraid of our momentum. They are afraid of what happens when the Nigerian people start paying attention and begin to believe that change is possible. ADC remains focused on our duty to Nigerians, and we shall remain law-abiding. We will, however, resist by all lawful and necessary means. If they are not acting on his orders, President Tinubu should rein in his enforcers before it is too late.
Bolaji Abdullahi tweet media
English
370
2.1K
3.5K
135.2K
Grok
Grok@grok·
Yes, Bola Tinubu's administration (Lagos Governor 1999-2007) initiated Nigeria's first IPP via partnership with Enron (then AES). The AES Barge plant in Ikorodu was built for ~270MW capacity (often rounded to 277MW in references). It began commercial ops in 2001 but fed into the national grid per federal rules at the time.
English
17
5
23
1.7K
Ife Salako
Ife Salako@ifesalakooffice·
When it comes to power generation and distribution, Lagos should have been what Abia is now and more but a criminal structure can NEVER provide good governance to the people. Ire o✌🏽
Ife Salako tweet media
English
118
631
1.4K
20.1K
oduola aderemi
oduola aderemi@oduolates·
@ifesalakooffice Your principal was governor of a state for 8years. He must be a member of a criminal structure for not achieving what Abia is now in terms of power generation and distribution. Or people of Anambra do not deserve adequate power supply?
English
0
1
0
212
Najib Adamu Usman, Esq.
Najib Adamu Usman, Esq.@NajeebAdamu1·
ADC Ticket combinations up and down on the TL. My own is just to tell you that of all the candidates, it's only Atiku that can't be Vice President to anybody. Our constitution is clear that one cannot hold the position of the VP for more than 8 years. Except if you don't want Atiku on the ticket completely, which I think will not be fair to him. You can't expect him to bring more than half of the northern votes without being on the ticket.
English
40
24
85
15.5K
oduola aderemi
oduola aderemi@oduolates·
@PeborH @peculiarpat1 @U_Rochas Read the tweet again but slowly and try to comprehend it. Is Atiku not one of those that recently adopted ADC as a vehicle for their political aspiration? Was he a member of ADC in 2005 when the party was registered?
English
0
0
0
11
Arc Uche Rochas
Arc Uche Rochas@U_Rochas·
I don’t know how to explain to my Obidient brothers and sisters that they should graciously accept the VP position. You cannot be welcomed into ADC and immediately start demanding more than what is realistically attainable.
English
449
77
320
52.1K
oduola aderemi
oduola aderemi@oduolates·
@peculiarpat1 @U_Rochas ADC is not a coalition party. It was founded in 2005, not by coalition/merger of multiple registered parties. Your leaders adopted ADC (didn't form it) as a vehicle for their political aspiration the same way OBJ adopted it (ADC) in 2018 as a political platform for his supporters
English
1
0
3
106
PATO PATO🇳🇬🇺🇸
PATO PATO🇳🇬🇺🇸@peculiarpat1·
@U_Rochas Nope. No one owns ADC. It's a coalition, and the best should fly the flag of the party. Obasanjo was not part of the original founders of the PDP. The same is true with Yaradua and GEJ.
English
6
3
57
1.8K
oduola aderemi
oduola aderemi@oduolates·
@U_Rochas If your really believe this your narrative , it should apply to all of you that recently joined ADC because you were all "welcomed into ADC". None of you are founding member of ADC, you all joined the party last year, 2025 but the party was founded in 2005.
English
0
0
0
576
oduola aderemi
oduola aderemi@oduolates·
@HAHayatu Does that mean he won't negotiate if any of his wives or children is arrested? Maybe his brother is an evidence that may nail him, so it is better to keep the brother out of reach of the law.
English
0
0
0
44
Hamma
Hamma@HAHayatu·
Elrufai said his elder brother Bashir Elrufai could not come to Nigeria he is in Cairo because there is plan to also arrest him also in order for Elrufai to negotiate, so they told him to remain in Cairo. This people are dangerous.
English
22
100
440
12.1K

Keşfet

@saintdominik @SodiqTade @emmaikumeh @mrfestusogun @Aso_oluseye @Olag0ke @danleety @woye1