ORS

@themagic_tophat Borson is such a fraud. Who hires this guy on Talksport to talk Citeh 115 case but yet doesn’t realise his complete bias as he is a 115 fan!!! I have also been blocked.

Shock horror - Borson can’t actually respond to my argument so he invents falsehoods to attack my credibility again. What a coward he is. Pathetic. And yes, Phillips was absolutely dire. His ghostly finding on undertakings not in good faith (reversed on appeal) was outlandishly bad - that alone should have had him kicked from the judiciary panel. But his incoherent determination that Everton agreed the sporting advantage arose from the breach and his outright wrong interpretation of the analytical modeling - those were indicative of dire quality. Not all KCs make good arbitrators or justices.

@themagic_tophat Boson is a fraud.

Unlike Borson, I’m not so arrogant as to post without first running my analysis past others vastly more qualified and experienced than myself (or him). Anyone relying on his analysis is a fool, especially on the Man City case. He has previously said my work on City is of high quality but that he couldn’t be bothered to read it all. Just goes to show how concerned he is with learning and finding truth rather than running agenda-driven falsehoods. The moment he asserted that he understands audit practice better than a qualified, trained auditor, because he is a company director that has had audit performed on his companies and he was once party to litigation against one… despite never having trained or practised in it… told me what I needed to know about him. His analysis on the Everton decision is as poor as the calibre of the panel authoring the decision. Everton’s argument on causation was that a breach did not occur until after Burnley’s relegation. As such, they argued they were not liable for losses and the earlier actions that gave rise to the breach are inconsequential. The Panel disagreed on the basis the breach was a continuing condition but Everton can most certainly still appeal this (and will). The Panel, being of pretty dire quality, worded it poorly when they wrote that Everton agreed that they gained a sporting advantage from the PSR breach because they clearly didn’t. Everton actually assented that their actions on spend helped give rise to a PSR breach and afforded sporting advantage. But they quite clearly argued the breach only happened at a later date. For the purposes of law, time is linear. Everton could not rationally agree that the sporting advantage was caused by the breach if they also argued the breach came AFTER the sporting advantage. To suggest otherwise is completely incoherent. What the Panel did was to combine ITS OWN FINDING that the breach was a continuous condition with Everton’s assent that their actions gave rise to a sporting advantage. Anyone remotely competent analysing the decision would realise this. The Slaughter’s team has. This is something ripe for appeal. Personally, I agree with the Panel’s finding that the breach constitutes a continuing condition but that doesn’t mean an Appel tribunal will do so. To suggest that they have no grounds here is nonsense. As for the “ad hominem attacks” - I’ve only ever responded in kind. For example, out of nowhere he recently asserted that I copied his work. As if I would ever do that. The reality is he was never able to deconstruct my Man City arguments or handle it when I demolished his own and he had to resort to attacking my credibility instead, without ever basing it on the quality of my work. On the contrary, my opinions on him are entirely formed from the bullshit he posts.

@ScottGShore @narindertweets 😂😂 shots fired Poor dear been found out. Now she’s frothing over Zack’s 🍆

Im worried about two things @narindertweets 1. Legalising drugs, open borders, and stopping war by saying “please mr president” is absolutely mental 2. The amount you used to froth over my massive Willy 🍆

@AzeemRafiq30 Coming from the bloke who has experienced test cricket 😂😂 Played a blinder last test and now this narrative. Give it a rest. Seriously.

Crocombe’s in as cover for Robinson Again. Same story, every series is this fitness, or is it professionalism? 👀 #cricket #england #fitness

@donmcgowan Desperate Don is now annoyed with Labour! He’s realising his hero Starmer is a failure. Imagine having your hero as Starmer 😂😂

Last week he said he’d be happy to cut welfare to fund defence. Now he’s keeping the pensioners happy. Only one thing that means … as Al Carns said this morning, going after disability and in-work benefits. 🤬

@mehdirhasan @zeteouk So it’s essentially a hard left outlet? No thanks.

So delighted and privileged to have been able to put together this all-star team of @zeteouk contributors for our UK launch this past week. Check out the video below, and do subscribe to zeteonews.co.uk to support independent journalism and help us disrupt the UK media.

@donmcgowan Desperate Don is realising Labour is in the gutter, so is continuing to attack Farage. Tries to deflect but we all see it. Question really is, what day next week will we hear his attacks on Reform?

What day this week do we expect Nigel Farage to start weaponising the England football team? We all know it's coming, I'm just curious as to when it might.

@mehdirhasan If you hate Musk so much, why use his app?

History will remember the millions of people who died around the world from preventable deaths because of Musk's DOGE cuts. History will remember Musk's enabling, amplifying, and funding of 21st-century fascism across the West.

@davidyelland So why use his platform if he is this terrible?

What has Elon Musk taken from you? So ask many including Andrew Neil. Here's the answer: He has taken our peace of mind. He has purposefully pushed us apart, divided us further and profited from our loss of community. And that is hard to ever forgive.

@piersmorgan Lefties and wokies aren’t worth it Piers. Leave them be with their jealous minds.

Elon literally owns this site, so every time he uses it, with his 240m followers, he is working.

@afneil Absolutely spot on Andrew. If anything he helps the left fulfill their net zero dream, but because he’s ultra wealthy he’s evil.

What difference does it make to your life?

@donmcgowan He also said the grown ups were now in charge! How wrong he and every socialist that voted Labour were!

Andrew Marr was positively giddy yesterday afternoon after John Healy resigned. He, Shelagh Fogarty, Nick Ferrari and Natasha Clarke sounded as though they were celebrating on LBC — talking about the inevitability of Starmer's demise. Also, this is about the 10th time Marr has incorrectly predicted the fall of this government. A stopped clock is right sometimes, I guess.

@donmcgowan 😂😂 Starmers in the clear!!! Every minister is resigning but Starmer is in the clear. Give your silly socialist head a wobble.

Utterly detached from reality. There won't be a General Election until 2029. The only thing that could possibly change after Reform lose Makerfield is a potential leadership challenge. If Reform win, Starmer is in the clear. It's like Sophie's Choice for the far-right.

@RichardBurgon Another deluded loon. Less on welfare, more on military. Simple.

The basic infrastructure in our country has been stretched beyond its limits by years of underinvestment and austerity. Our schools, hospitals, social housing and transport systems are on their knees and fall far short of what our communities need. Of course, we must address the risks and threats facing our country. But that does not mean simply pouring ever more money into the military, which has already received funding increases in recent years. Doing so would inevitably mean less money for the public services and infrastructure on which people depend. When we look at the risks we face, it is important to note that the Government’s own assessments identify pandemics, cyber attacks, failures of critical infrastructure such as the electricity system, and climate-related emergencies among the most serious threats facing Britain. This underlines that national security is broader than military security. Just because these other risks receive far less media attention, it does not mean they are not serious. If we're to address these risks, then that requires major investment in the foundations of our society: our public services, critical infrastructure, preparedness and resilience. We need the debate taking place about ever more military spending to acknowledge that it will not protect us from many of the most serious threats we face.

@donmcgowan Depressed Don? Final days of your beloved PM are upon us. What utter dross you socialists serve up, worse than the Tories.

He really thinks a lot of himself, doesn't he. Considering most people hadn't heard of him until a month ago, he's certainly got some self-confidence.

@DaleVince You are one absolute delusional loon.

This looks like opportunism to me. Will the country be safer with John Healey gone, will the defence budget issues somehow get resolved…? Nah, this is posturing for self gain - in my view. Worse part - it undermines the government at a time when we have so much to deal with as a nation - not least, and with deep irony….handling defence threats. Defence Secretary quits, that’ll help. Have to say this though, I think the extent of the threat Russia poses is exaggerated, this rather sudden need for £28 billion seems a bit opportunistic also from the Defence Industry. On the other hand we keep hearing that Russia is losing in Ukraine - can they be a threat to Europe and be losing to Ukraine? theguardian.com/politics/2026/…

@NickCohen4 Perhaps leave his platform first? Actions speak louder than words!

For how much longer can we tolerate Elon Musk? Me on how liberal democracies have the right to use the law to judge whether the world’s richest man is inciting violence on our streets substacktools.com/sharex/BDgpV6hj

@DPJHodges Hodges is petrified of Farage. Not sure why as he writes for a paper that is fully in support of his policies. Hypocrisy?

This tweet was sent by Nigel Farage an hour ago. Clearly regards fly-tipping as the most pressing issue facing Britain this morning.

@MrHarryCole The irony of jobbie - stands up for those on welfare as opposed to the hard working Brits. Shameless.

Not a spoof… Jobbie has a piping hot take tomorrow

@lukejcr All you do is focus on Farage. We have voted in these lot just to focus on Farage. Do better.

Is there any cause Farage won’t attach himself to if there’s money involved? First the Cameo videos. Then a £5 million Brexit “reward”. Now earnings from events linked to US anti-abortion activists. This isn’t just about cash. It’s about judgment and values. How low will he go?