Taishi

69 posts

Taishi banner
Taishi

Taishi

@omochiui

ビットコイン研究所 https://t.co/a0ROc4CuyA #lightningnetwork ⚡️[email protected]

Katılım Şubat 2025
185 Takip Edilen63 Takipçiler
Taishi
Taishi@omochiui·
チェスのアンパッサンというルールを初めて知った 将棋好きからしたら結構驚き
日本語
0
0
0
49
Taishi
Taishi@omochiui·
若手ビットコイナー代表として出演してきます
Koji Higashi@Coin_and_Peace

ビットコイナー反省会の定例放送は明日7月21日(火)の19時半からです! 今回はジョーさんが日程調整が難しかったので、代役として @JBIinc_bitcoin で量子コンピュータなどに関しても積極的に発信している若手ビットコイナー三倉さんにきてもらうことになりました。 youtube.com/watch?v=GkewR_…

日本語
0
3
13
2.2K
Taishi
Taishi@omochiui·
@Oskwtkm Pay to Merkle Root (P2MR)の話ですか???
日本語
1
0
0
49
Oshikawa Takumu
Oshikawa Takumu@Oskwtkm·
ビットコインの耐量子移行のシナリオは一時的に量子体制のある避難方法を用意してからその後に耐量子署名を追加する段階的な移行方針なのか。
日本語
1
0
1
635
Taishi
Taishi@omochiui·
bitcoin-research.jp/bitcoin-covena… 大石さんのコベナンツ記事 コベナンツがあれば送金先に制限をつけたコインを作成することが可能。最近はあまり話題になっていない印象だが実際どうなのだろうか。
日本語
0
0
0
89
Taishi
Taishi@omochiui·
40分とてもあっという間でした!本日あまり話せなかった部分など詳細は記事に書こうと思うので機会があればご覧ください!
Taishi tweet media
日本語
0
3
12
761
Taishi
Taishi@omochiui·
@SatoshiSisters0 今日はありがとうございました!またお話ししましょう!
日本語
1
1
3
130
Matthew⚡️
Matthew⚡️@SatoshiSisters0·
東京駅お刺身ミートアップなう。
日本語
1
0
3
149
Matthew⚡️
Matthew⚡️@SatoshiSisters0·
みんなとご飯行きたかったなぁ。 初めてお会いした三倉さんやししゃもさんたちともっと話がしたかった。 …毎度同じ悩み。
日本語
1
0
12
802
Taishi
Taishi@omochiui·
bitcoin-research.jp/bitcoin-multip… 複数の実装があることでバグに対する冗長性がある一方機能ごとの特徴を生かした開発ができることに合点がいった
日本語
0
0
1
95
Taishi retweetledi
ちょめじ
ちょめじ@ch0meji·
時間があんまり無くて対応出来ていなかったんですが 精肉店でのビットコイン決済も対応しました。 飲食店やキッチンカーで受け取ったビットコイン 円に換えるのではなくそのまま使える所があれば良い。 前に内田先生@uchida_tomato が言ってたのを聞いて、やらなきゃ!と思ってました。 あとは誰か豚とか牛をビットコインで売ってくれると更に循環するかも?そんな持ってないけども。 【おにくのミンスマン】東京府中市 instagram.com/minceman_staff/ maps.app.goo.gl/xK9KwpGGJzLDaD…
ちょめじ tweet mediaちょめじ tweet mediaちょめじ tweet media
日本語
1
20
70
14.7K
Taishi retweetledi
日本ビットコイン産業株式会社
広島学院中・高等学校の「Bitcoin学」ゼミにお招きいただき、高校2年生へ出張授業を実施しました。ライトニングで実際に送金する実習や、ビットコイン企業で働くキャリアの話まで。ビットコインの"技術と仕事"を等身大でお伝えしました。 jbi.co.jp/company/news/3…
日本語
0
15
42
5.4K
Taishi retweetledi
ビットコイン研究所
ビットコイン研究所@bitcoin_resjp·
【お知らせ】 アモーヴァ・アセットマネジメントと連携し、ビットコインに関するコンテンツを共同制作することになりました。 共同制作コンテンツは、アモーヴァ・アセット運営のメディアサイト「Crypto Lab.(クリプトラボ)」と、ビットコイン研究所それぞれに掲載します。
日本ビットコイン産業株式会社@JBIinc_bitcoin

【お知らせ】 日本ビットコイン産業、アモーヴァ・アセットマネジメントと連携しビットコインに関するコンテンツを共同制作 jbi.co.jp/company/news/3…

日本語
0
5
12
1.5K
Taishi
Taishi@omochiui·
Noah Walletでは期限切れのVTXOをユーザーが保持しておく設計になっているがどこでリフレッシュすればいいのだろうか
日本語
0
0
1
39
Taishi
Taishi@omochiui·
@n1ckler Really enjoyed your posts on SHRINCS and SHRIMPS One small curiosity: is there a story behind the names? They feel like playful wordplay on SPHINCS+, but I wasn't sure if they expand into specific acronyms.
English
0
0
1
5
Jonas Nick
Jonas Nick@n1ckler·
I wish this interview had been longer, but I’m glad we agree on the key points, including that post-quantum signatures for Bitcoin are a nuanced topic, there are real tradeoffs, and there is no plug-in solution. I didn’t hear an argument against SHRINCS itself. Rather, Dan prefers lattices because they support HD derivation and efficient threshold schemes. But with today’s schemes, once you add those features, signatures are no longer small — e.g. 25+ kB with HD derivation. Lattice-based signatures still need more research before they are clearly the better choice for Bitcoin. I disagree that hash-based signatures “stifle” anything. They are a pragmatic choice today, and they will always retain fundamental advantages: no new cryptographic assumptions and conceptual simplicity. Lattice-based signatures are a promising candidate for the future, once their advantages are clear enough to justify the added complexity and assumptions.
Isabel Foxen Duke⚡️@isabelfoxenduke

BITCOIN RAILS #61: QUANTUM CRYPTOGRAPHY FOR BITCOIN | with Dan Boneh @danboneh 🔗 YOUTUBE: youtu.be/F-HG87VJj_k 🌿 SPOTIFY: open.spotify.com/episode/7ly1k2… One of the most prolific and influential cryptographers in the world, it’s difficult to fully quantify the impact that Dan Boneh has had on Bitcoin and digital assets more broadly. Through both his own research and his mentorship of some of the space’s most important contributors — e.g. Andrew Poelstra, @benediktbuenz, and @robin_linus — few people have done more to shape the cryptographic foundations underlying modern blockchains and digital finance. More recently, Dan co-authored @Google's widely discussed paper, “Securing Elliptic Curve Cryptocurrencies against Quantum Vulnerabilities,” which reduced prior estimates of the resources required to run Shor’s algorithm against the elliptic-curve cryptography used by Bitcoin. The paper reignited debate around quantum computing timelines and the long-term security assumptions behind modern cryptocurrencies. In this episode of Bitcoin Rails, Dan and I discuss the current state of quantum computing, its potential implications for Bitcoin, and how he believes the Bitcoin community should think about preparing for a post-quantum future over the coming decade and beyond. And yes, Dan shares his take on the “when quantum” question in the interview, among other key perspectives. This episode of Bitcoin Rails is brought to you by my NEW sponsors: LayerTwo Labs @LayerTwoLabs — developing research, software, and technologies for scaling Bitcoin via the integration of Drivechains (BIP 300/301) Hashi on @SuiNetwork — a primitive for executing Bitcoin Defi transactions, without having to trust a federated bridge or other centralized entity BitBox @BitBoxSwiss — an open-source Bitcoin-only hardware wallet, with smooth UX and no compromises on security. Check out Bitbox [dot] swiss and use code BITCOINRAILS to get a discount TIMESTAMPS: 00:00 — Intro and Dan’s history with cryptography and Bitcoin 11:44 — Shor's algorithm: how a 1994 paper became cryptography's most important threat 16:39 — Building a quantum computer: superconducting qubits vs neutral atoms 25:37 — When should we start worrying about quantum computers? The timeline debate 31:51 — Have we already reached quantum computing's “ahá” moment? 39:09 — Inside the Google paper: how Shor's algorithm was optimized 49:57 — The Bitcoin mempool attack and the 10-minute window 59:21 — Mitigation: what should Bitcoin do to prepare for quantum? 1:11:54 — Hash-based vs lattice-based signatures: Dan's case for lattice 1:23:15 — ZK proofs, BIP361, and what to do with Satoshi's coins 1:31:52 — Encrypted mempools and MEV 1:38:29 — Why Bitcoin will survive quantum and Dan's message to Bitcoin builders

English
9
18
79
18.6K
Taishi retweetledi
Craig Raw 🐦
Craig Raw 🐦@craigraw·
My attempt to protect users from scam apps on the @AppStore has gotten my Apple Developer account flagged for termination - ironically, for "dishonest activity". Unless it's reversed by June 30, all new installs of Sparrow Wallet will fail, and development on macOS will end. The context: since 2023, more than a dozen fake "Sparrow" apps have appeared on the App Store, as recently as April this year. Users have contacted me after losing their savings, in some cases their life savings, to these impersonators. I'm the developer of the real Sparrow Wallet, a desktop app, and I hold the registered US trademarks for the name and logo. I have publicly warned @Apple and the community about these fake apps from early 2024, but they keep appearing. The app @Apple flagged was a placeholder that was never published. Its only purpose was to warn users that Sparrow is desktop-only and that other "Sparrow" apps aren't mine. This approach may have been misguided, but there was nothing dishonest about it. I'm confident this is an automated misclassification that Apple would reverse on review - but I may be terminated before a human ever looks at my appeal. The cost would fall on @Apple's own users: blocked installs and no updates for a tool people rely on, which opens the door for more fakes. If you value Sparrow, a repost would help. @AppleSupport
Craig Raw 🐦@craigraw

@statusquont @bitcoinfool @Apple Didn’t work. App (with the screens below) was rejected for having “placeholder content” and only “demonstrating a concept”.

English
172
1K
1.9K
465.3K