mike schneider

268 posts

mike schneider banner
mike schneider

mike schneider

@onemikey

film & tv writer | 2x @theblcklst alum | author this book does not exist | rep @navigationmg

los angeles Katılım Şubat 2009
369 Takip Edilen536 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
mike schneider
mike schneider@onemikey·
gonna use this account differently moving forward. more showing how I think and work as an artist. some of it'll be about storytelling. some will be about trying to grow and maintain a career in film & tv in a landscape altered by short form video and AI. a few thoughts on why
English
2
0
0
182
mike schneider
mike schneider@onemikey·
Amadeus but it’s Jax vs James from Vanderpump Rules
English
0
0
0
90
mike schneider
mike schneider@onemikey·
@rsuyoy So advanced that the first two sentences were written by AI
English
0
0
0
35
Yousr
Yousr@rsuyoy·
Steve jobs absolutely cooked with this: "It's not a faith in technology. It's faith in people. Technology is nothing. What’s important is that you have a faith in people, that they’re basically good and smart, and if you give them tools, they’ll do wonderful things with them."
English
14
123
1.1K
31.4K
mike schneider
mike schneider@onemikey·
Feels like the moment at the start of the pandemic when the NBA suspended the season but for AI. We'll see.
jack@jack

we're making @blocks smaller today. here's my note to the company. #### today we're making one of the hardest decisions in the history of our company: we're reducing our organization by nearly half, from over 10,000 people to just under 6,000. that means over 4,000 of you are being asked to leave or entering into consultation. i'll be straight about what's happening, why, and what it means for everyone. first off, if you're one of the people affected, you'll receive your salary for 20 weeks + 1 week per year of tenure, equity vested through the end of may, 6 months of health care, your corporate devices, and $5,000 to put toward whatever you need to help you in this transition (if you’re outside the U.S. you’ll receive similar support but exact details are going to vary based on local requirements). i want you to know that before anything else. everyone will be notified today, whether you're being asked to leave, entering consultation, or asked to stay. we're not making this decision because we're in trouble. our business is strong. gross profit continues to grow, we continue to serve more and more customers, and profitability is improving. but something has changed. we're already seeing that the intelligence tools we’re creating and using, paired with smaller and flatter teams, are enabling a new way of working which fundamentally changes what it means to build and run a company. and that's accelerating rapidly. i had two options: cut gradually over months or years as this shift plays out, or be honest about where we are and act on it now. i chose the latter. repeated rounds of cuts are destructive to morale, to focus, and to the trust that customers and shareholders place in our ability to lead. i'd rather take a hard, clear action now and build from a position we believe in than manage a slow reduction of people toward the same outcome. a smaller company also gives us the space to grow our business the right way, on our own terms, instead of constantly reacting to market pressures. a decision at this scale carries risk. but so does standing still. we've done a full review to determine the roles and people we require to reliably grow the business from here, and we've pressure-tested those decisions from multiple angles. i accept that we may have gotten some of them wrong, and we've built in flexibility to account for that, and do the right thing for our customers. we're not going to just disappear people from slack and email and pretend they were never here. communication channels will stay open through thursday evening (pacific) so everyone can say goodbye properly, and share whatever you wish. i'll also be hosting a live video session to thank everyone at 3:35pm pacific. i know doing it this way might feel awkward. i'd rather it feel awkward and human than efficient and cold. to those of you leaving…i’m grateful for you, and i’m sorry to put you through this. you built what this company is today. that's a fact that i'll honor forever. this decision is not a reflection of what you contributed. you will be a great contributor to any organization going forward. to those staying…i made this decision, and i'll own it. what i'm asking of you is to build with me. we're going to build this company with intelligence at the core of everything we do. how we work, how we create, how we serve our customers. our customers will feel this shift too, and we're going to help them navigate it: towards a future where they can build their own features directly, composed of our capabilities and served through our interfaces. that's what i'm focused on now. expect a note from me tomorrow. jack

English
0
0
0
29
Henry Daubrez 🌸💀
Henry Daubrez 🌸💀@henrydaubrez·
I’ll bite. There are a lot of good things in this article and I genuinely agree with parts of it. Taste, vision, intention, clarity of purpose. These are things I have been repeating for years now. But saying we are ready to “disrupt distribution channels” feels wrong to me. We still need traditional networks. We still need festivals. We still need broadcasters, studios, and people who know how to bring stories to audiences at scale. Let’s be honest, how many of us would refuse a Netflix deal if it came tomorrow. Social media is not a real replacement for that for most creators. Viral short form content and concept trailers are one thing. Turning that into meaningful IP is another. And most people in this space, myself included sometimes, are still learning how to properly tell a story. I also don’t fully buy the idea that the monopoly is “broken.” Yes, production barriers are lower. But visibility, trust, and cultural impact are still gatekept. The gate just moved from studio executives to algorithms, platforms, and attention economics. Power did not disappear. It changed shape. Another issue is the idea that decision making alone is now the only skill that matters. Decision making is important, but it is not enough. What still matters is narrative skill, emotional intelligence, lived experience, ethics, and responsibility. Knowing what to make is not the same as knowing how to make it meaningful for others. Making something is not the same as having it matter. I also struggle with the “we will create the content we want to see” narrative. In practice, what we see right now is endless sci fi, anime clones, celebrity swaps, and aesthetic experiments driven by what tools suggest, not by what people uniquely want to say. This is not liberation yet. It is pattern gravity. Great storytellers remain rare. AI does not turn everyone into Spielberg overnight. The vast majority of us will still remain anonymous. AI or not. Yes, AI can help level the ground. But leveling production is not the same as leveling authorship. The real scarcity is not tools. It is earned trust, clarity of voice, and the ability to sustain a relationship with an audience over time. Those things cannot be compressed into weeks. I do believe this is an opportunity. But not one that lives outside the traditional industry. I think the smartest path is in between. People who understand the technology and what it can and cannot do, and who can work with the people who hold the contacts, budgets, and experience of storytelling at scale. The “we don’t need the traditional industry” narrative feels shortsighted. We all still have something to learn from each other. AI changes the paradigm, yes. But looking at it only as a replacement of parts misses most of the point. It is not just about doing things faster. It is about how stories are imagined, shaped, and carried forward. And that still requires humans who know why they are making something in the first place. Poor creatives with AI will remain poor creatives. No amount of output, pain, or technical mastery will fix the absence of vision. Tools collapsed production barriers. They did not collapse the need for storytelling skill, audience trust, or cultural legitimacy. Decision making alone does not replace those. That is where the real work still is.
Ivan — VVSVS™@_VVSVS

x.com/i/article/2017…

English
11
4
52
6.3K
LSDXOXO
LSDXOXO@LSDXOXO_·
Wouldn’t you guys like to know a little…less about artists?
English
23
104
1.2K
60.4K
mike schneider
mike schneider@onemikey·
working on a new short story. the working title is "the repulsiveness of the world" so you know it's for the children.
English
0
0
0
37
mike schneider
mike schneider@onemikey·
@i_zzzzzz echoes of viggo folding an entire pizza in half before eating it in green book
English
0
0
0
177
Brooks Otterlake
Brooks Otterlake@i_zzzzzz·
There’s a scene in Sentimental Value where Stellan Skarsgard tries to clean up a spill by getting an entire roll of paper towel (still on the cardboard tube), soaking it under a kitchen faucet and awkwardly wiping a table with the entire wet mass. I’ve never seen anything like it
English
47
375
11.4K
607.7K
mike schneider
mike schneider@onemikey·
Increasing sense that art that hits on uncomfortable truths is being rejected by the general public
English
0
0
0
90
Woodward Sports Network
Woodward Sports Network@woodwardsports·
Jared Goff was sacked 5 times and pressured on 20/42 dropbacks; Goff went 6/15 for 71 yds when pressured. Without pressure, Goff went 19/22 for 213 yards and 2 touchdowns per @NextGenStats
Woodward Sports Network tweet media
English
68
23
386
58.3K
mike schneider
mike schneider@onemikey·
watching shark tank imagining an intro that starts with “Kevin O’Leary is an academy award winning actor and investor who…”
English
0
0
1
50
mike schneider
mike schneider@onemikey·
vine was the practical effects version of sora
English
0
0
0
38
signüll
signüll@signulll·
this is the ultimate source of trump’s durability. most people think resilience is about feeling it but pushing through but trump bypasses the feeling part entirely. that’s how he metabolizes losses, deaths, & scandals. he treats them as narrative beats, not emotional events. this is highly effective for surviving in high velocity politics & media warzones. he doesn’t process grief because grief doesn’t fit his operating model which is constant forward motion & constant dominance display. this is a feature of trump, not a bug.
Republicans against Trump@RpsAgainstTrump

Trump last night at Yankee Stadium. Clearly devastated over Charlie Kirk’s death…

English
184
346
8.2K
970.7K
Matt Harrison
Matt Harrison@__mharrison__·
By my calculation, @AnthropicAI owes me around $60,000. There was a recent settlement where Anthropic is paying authors $3,000 per book that they illegally acquired and used for their training data. I've written a few books and can find almost 20 of mine in their stolen content. It’s a strange moment as an author. On one hand, validating that our work has real value in this new AI economy. On the other, frustrating that consent wasn’t part of the process. Let's see what happens and how much of this $60k I actually receive...
Matt Harrison tweet media
English
132
168
3.4K
319.7K
mike schneider
mike schneider@onemikey·
the argument for creating new fiction in whatever form is that stories need to relate to the present moment to be useful, to help people navigate the world they live in everything we create should reflect the NOW very intensely
English
0
0
0
30
mike schneider
mike schneider@onemikey·
what DOES get found gets forgotten faster than ever PLUS digital media ie streaming and ebooks has made it soooooooooo much easier to access movies, tv shows, and books throughout history is there really any point to telling new stories?
English
1
0
0
42
mike schneider
mike schneider@onemikey·
i'm having a really hard time. i started writing so i could connect with other people through storytelling, but it's increasingly difficult to find an audience beyond family and friends. the endless scroll de-prioritizes everything
English
1
0
1
42