OlderThanAverageGamer

LIVE on YouTube TUES/WED/THURS @ 2pm EST - youtube.com/olderthanavera…

@tommysotogeist @DavidDu32272447 @curiosityonx Starts with calling a scientifically accepted photo "..bs" then gets mad that people called him out 🍻 Well played.

@DavidDu32272447 @curiosityonx What ever. Name calling on the internet. I never meet none of yall lame azzes in real life who feel this comfortable to confront a person this disrespectfully because u see or hear something u don’t agree with. Lame azzes white dudes. Scary in person

On Valentine’s Day 36 years ago, Carl Sagan requested NASA to turn Voyager 1's camera back toward home for one last look. From 3.7 billion miles away, Voyager captured this image. Here is how Carl Sagan described it: “Look again at that dot. That's here. That's home. That's us. On it, everyone you love, everyone you know, everyone you ever heard of, every human being who ever was, lived out their lives. The aggregate of our joy and suffering, thousands of confident religions, ideologies, and economic doctrines, every hunter and forager, every hero and coward, every creator and destroyer of civilization, every king and peasant, every young couple in love, every mother and father, hopeful child, inventor, and explorer, every teacher of morals, every corrupt politician, every 'superstar,' every 'supreme leader,' every saint and sinner in the history of our species lived there — on a mote of dust suspended in a sunbeam. The Earth is the only world known so far to harbor life. There is nowhere else, at least in the near future, to which our species could migrate. Visit, yes. Settle, not yet. Like it or not, for the moment the Earth is where we make our stand. It has been said that astronomy is a humbling and character-building experience. There is perhaps no better demonstration of the folly of human conceits than this distant image of our tiny world. To me, it underscores our responsibility to deal more kindly with one another, and to preserve and cherish the pale blue dot, the only home we've ever known.”

@tommysotogeist @dinicola4907 @curiosityonx There are plenty of rich morons. Doesn't change anything.

@dinicola4907 @curiosityonx Im rich u aren’t. Remember that

@tommysotogeist @ForexNChill @curiosityonx We had plenty already.. what the hell are you talking about? 😂

@ForexNChill @curiosityonx One of the first photos we would have taken would have been of our on planet. wtf would we wait to get that far away and then be like oh let’s take a photo of earth lol

@tommysotogeist @curiosityonx Stupid.. ⬆️

@curiosityonx Who believes this? Why wait to take the photo when u are so far away? Yet not take it when u r close? Bs

@radres @curiosityonx What a useless, pointless, classless, comment.

@curiosityonx because sagan wanted it, nasa actually did it? how noble. earth from 3.7b miles looks like a speck of dust. what’s the point really?

@franko_ufo @AstronomyVibes It isn't for you anyways. Being able to properly finish sentences may be a prerequisite.

@AstronomyVibes More cheap Chinese junk. I wouldn’t buy one if you gave me 99% off.

🚨 China has officially begun selling the world’s first atomic-based quantum computer, marking a turning point where quantum hardware steps out of experimental labs and into the commercial marketplace. Unlike superconducting or ion-trap systems, this new machine uses individual atoms arranged in optical lattices, allowing them to function as highly stable qubits with far longer coherence times. That stability is a breakthrough — fewer errors mean deeper and more complex quantum calculations. Early demonstrations show the system handling molecular simulations, encryption-breaking scenarios, and optimization problems that stretch classical supercomputers to their limits. By manipulating atoms with ultra-precise lasers, developers have achieved a level of control that makes atomic qubits exceptionally reliable for real-world scientific and industrial applications. For the first time, universities, corporations, and research institutions can buy a fully functional atomic quantum computer, rather than accessing one over the cloud. This opens the door to private quantum drug discovery, advanced materials research, AI acceleration, and next-generation cybersecurity testing. Analysts warn it could significantly accelerate the global quantum race — a shift that may redefine technological power in the decades ahead. #QuantumComputing

@Curlh1 @curiosityonx One wonders if we faced the same challenge here, would we have figured a slightly different way to do it? Apples to Apples comparisons are useful but, ingenuity is most certainly born from problem solving.

@curiosityonx 2.6x the size = 8.6x the mass. This means that if there is advanced life, and if they rely on rocket propulsion, there is likely no chance they ever escape their own gravity. But even proof of bacteria would be super cool :)

🚨JWST detected dimethyl sulfide in its atmosphere, which on Earth is produced by life. K2-18b is potentially habitable super-Earth about 2.6 times the size of our planet. It is located 124 light-years from the Solar System.

@theburntpeanut Some War correspondent photos from the "War" tonight. It was.. a LITTLE one sided 😆 @ARCRaidersGame #ArcRaiders

@BattlefieldComm Nuances with map size aside, for me the single biggest gameplay issue is ping/server consistency. One round everything feels good, the next, you can absolutely tell how bad desync is when you're watching 7 hit markers and then get hit twice with a PDW and die.

@BFBulletin Gauntlet Mode within the Redsec section is a silent banger and one of the smartest moves made here. 8 teams of 4, 4 rounds, 4 modes within those rounds creating a mini tournament. And there's a lot of different game types they throw out at you if you play through a few of these

#Battlefield6's REDSEC receives mostly "negative reviews" on Steam. Most of these "negative reviews" are because the lack of a 'solo' mode (which can lead in extremely difficult matches with full pre-made squads), and the fact you have to complete Battle Royale weekly challenges for the main game since many fans don't want to play BR.

@clydefrog68 @BFBulletin They're not.. Respawn Entertainment handles ALL development for the BR.. DICE does the main game.

@BFBulletin Imagine how many more base game maps we could have had if they werent wasting their time and effort on this fortnight crap that no battlefield fan even wants.

@GunLanceMan @BFBulletin And no one played Firestorm (a shit ton of people are playing this) and DICE tried developing Firestorm while also handling BFV. All things that aren't the same here. Respawn Entertainment handles ALL the Redsec BR development, not DICE.

@BFBulletin They shouldn't have tried to do a br again This exact thing happened with firestorm except this time you don't have to pay for it

@wilkymsb @BFBulletin But you didn't realize that Respawn Entertainment handles ALL Redsec development and DICE handles Battlefield (MP + Campaign).

@BFBulletin I ain't a fan br in the slightest and dice fucking knows there player base isn't interested that's why they made it ftp its not my dice anymore I've finally realised it I gave them one more chance with 6 and they only seem to care about cod players of the br even as we pay for it

@JessieRoe91 @BFBulletin It's developed by a different studio than the one that handles the main game/campaign (DICE: BF / Respawn Entertainment: Redsec) so any notion one affects the other is just blind hate.

@BFBulletin If they keep this battle royale garbage up I'm going to just go back to BF4. Leave that trash to CoD. We want the OG battlefield experience. Not whatever this wannabe slop is.

@PuchalaUkasz @BFBulletin Good God.. does no one understand DICE isn't even the studio the handles the development for Redsec? Respawn Entertainment does and DICE went out of their way to let everyone know their focus will always be the main game.

@BFBulletin I hope BR in BF6 dies quickly and the studio sticks to standard MP. Fuck all BRs.

@knightszos @BFBulletin Guys, you need to relax. Redsec is PART of Battlefield but it's not even developed by DICE. Respawn Entertainment handles it. DICE is 100% invested in Battlefield MP and Campaign.

@BFBulletin bf shoulda just stayed outta the BR market. focus on a great game instead.

@A321200 @BFBulletin It's not even developed by DICE so the idea that this "detracts" from the Battlefield experience is simply unjustified. Respawn Entertainment handles Redsec, not DICE. Just don't play it. It's really that simple.

OG Battlefield people were promised “going back to our roots”. They did this to get the presale numbers up. Now they release this REDSEC crap which caters to streamers and COD players and detracts from the core Battlefield experience. What a joke this is becoming. We all got bamboozled.

@BFBulletin The idea is correct. The implementation is too knee jerk. It should effect ALL passworded BOT fill servers. Public servers with backfill should receive 20% of full gains and weapon challenges can only be engaged if the server reaches 75% capacity.

Backend Update: Battlefield Studios has removed the XP gain for all custom Portal community experiences (including farming and legit servers) that have bots enabled. Any custom community experience that has bots enabled will only be offering 150% as bonus for match completion in #Battlefield6 Portal. The official experiences from the front page haven't been affected by this change. This is only for Portal servers.

@kjbdev @BFBulletin @BattlefieldComm You're hurting every single person that's trying to create a unique experience for other Battlefield players via portal. Which, in essence, is that Portal was meant to be. Having 6,000 bit farms with passwords is a problem whether you like it or not.

@Akelaphobia @warrior4204life @BFBulletin It was a mistake NOT to disallow this kind of hosting to begin with. They're correcting a mistake, like it or not. There were a SHIT ton of people who hated the idea of full XP in servers with BOTS or BOT backfill so it's not at all like no one cared to begin with. They did.

@warrior4204life @BFBulletin They promised every single person would be able to host their own persistent server. You should be mad at EA for breaking their promise and not increasing server capacity, not the people who were just playing the game normally with bot fill enabled.