Sabitlenmiş Tweet
We started small. A community space for crypto people
Looking for credible info, connection, and a voice.
Today, that idea has grown into Our Crypto Talk (OCT)
The first media house born on socials. 🧵👇
English
Our Crypto Talk
36.5K posts
Our Crypto Talk
@ourcryptotalk
Crypto media, born on socials. Telling stories that shape crypto and covering projects that make a difference.
Katılım Kasım 2021
1.3K Takip Edilen79.7K Takipçiler
11/ Bottom line:
If $INJ holds the $4.35 to $4.50 area, reclaims $5, and the Summit delivers real announcements, the current dip could turn into a major reset opportunity.
Follow @ourcryptotalk for more deep dives on altcoins where catalysts meet price action.
Our Crypto Talk@ourcryptotalk
$INJ has been under pressure lately. But the next few weeks could be important. The Injective Summit is coming on July 16, and it sits right at the intersection of tokenization, policy, institutions, and onchain finance. Here’s what’s next for Injective. 🧵 👇
English
10/ Weekly timeframe
$INJ is now close to its 2023 accumulation levels.
The long-term chart still shows major falling-wedge style compression from previous cycle highs.
Price has cooled down massively, and this zone is now a major historical demand area for long-term buyers.
English
$INJ has been under pressure lately.
But the next few weeks could be important.
The Injective Summit is coming on July 16, and it sits right at the intersection of tokenization, policy, institutions, and onchain finance.
Here’s what’s next for Injective.
🧵 👇
English
@CagFlorida93924 His track record of backing projects in 2026 has been abysmal.
English
@ourcryptotalk It seems like he's getting into the pump and dump business. I'll pass on what he or any other influencers are dumping!
English
$CARDS is a project that has done amazingly well lately.
Now, it is being talked about by none other than Arthur Hayes.
I'd like to take this time to remind everyone the latest dumps he has laid on us 👇
$ZEC => $371
$WLD => $0.43
$NEAR => $2.31
$HYPE => $64
And all of those after giving very high ( tbh, unrealistic ) valuations for each of these.
Make of it what you will.
@Collector_Crypt is a great project, definitely.
Arthur Hayes is not someone who's words I would trust lately.
Arthur Hayes@CryptoHayes
The ticker is $CARDS degens. The thesis is solid. The price will be pamping! Yachtzee bitches 😘😘😘😘😘😘😘
English
@NikH_twist I don't think everyone is capable of reading the code. And also, its not just the code that matters when it comes to token price, does it?
English
@ourcryptotalk Hayes says pamp, someone else says dump. I stopped listening long ago. If you need a spokesperson, you're still in a black box. Read the code.
English
@SaintLee04 Call it whatever you may - the thing is he doesn not instil confidence anymore, in fact instils a fear that he'll sell.
English
@ourcryptotalk interesting how he called out the exact prices, those are brutal numbers
English
@stacy_muur This does not look good at all.
$ETH as an asset was already struggling and the foundation is not instilling any confidence at all.
English
This is crisis for EF.
First thing companies do for crisis management is cutting down costs.
EF is reducing its annual budget by roughly 40% and cutting about 54 employees.
Explained as a shift from a spending organization to a long-term endowment model.
Expecting more ETH ETF outflows :(
vitalik.eth@VitalikButerin
This year, the EF is decreasing its budget by roughly 40%, which entails some difficult decisions. The goal of the decreases was set out in the Treasury Management Policy last year: the EF is transitioning into being a long-term-oriented endowment-based organization, shifting from its pre-2026 average of spending ~15% of its remaining funds each year, toward a post-2030 target of ~5% per year. Often, when an organization goes through something like this, people try to pretend that nothing of great value was lost, that it is an efficiency increase, that the only people cut are unproductive dead weight, and everyone else stopped partying, studied the blade, entered cracked S-tier beast mode, and this was sufficient to make up for the downside. I will not try to pretend this. I respect my EF colleagues far too much to pretend that there was not much that is lost. They are brilliant people. They are dedicated engineers of whom some have worked on the Ethereum protocol for nearly a decade. They have brought a bright light to the Ethereum ecosystem with their code, their words, their warmth as human beings and their actions. My dearest hope is that they find a path that brings them fulfillment and happiness whether inside Ethereum or outside. Hopefully many will be able to bring their excellent talents and mindset to the wider Ethereum ecosystem, or the even wider CROPS world. Instead, I will try to explain what *are* some of the grand sacrifices being made. The Ethereum Strawmap is no small thing. It is an extremely ambitious undertaking seeking to replace and augment almost every part of the protocol - consensus, proofs, privacy, account model, state, and more. This is the third iteration of Ethereum, in the same way that the Merge was the second, even if the shipping style is less Big Bang and more one-piece-at-a-time. On top of this, the EF is increasing its role in the Access Layer. We are not compromising on Ethereum being a Deeply Impressive protocol, something worthy of its place in a world with quantum computing, rockets to Mars and powerful biotech and AI, and capable of meeting the challenges that this era will bring. Some of the deficit will be recovered through more work happening outside the EF. But not all. So what are the grand sacrifices that will enable a leaner effort to accomplish all of this? I will give a few examples (though far from an exhaustive list): * The multi-client model will shift in the direction of multiple clients existing less for _redundancy_, and more for _specialization_. Up to this point, redundancy has been the main security strategy: if one client has a bug, if it has less than 33%, the chain keeps going and does not even stop finalizing. We are increasingly exploring moving more pieces of the protocol to a different security strategy: AI-assisted formal verification. Some smaller pieces of Ethereum (eg. BLS libraries) have worked this way already for a long time. But soon many more parts of Ethereum will likely function on this model. This may greatly reduce resource requirements of shipping a large number of EIPs. The resources saved by client teams can ideally instead be used to better serve different specialized user needs, including EF Access Layer goals. * PSE (Privacy and Scaling Explorations) is winding down as a unit. The number of people working on ZKPs for privacy and scaling is probably as high as ever, but they are working less on "exploration" and more on *implementing* ZKP-based privacy and scaling into the Protocol and Access Layer * Devcon will likely over time become smaller-scale, somewhat more spartan, much lower-deficit than previous years, in addition to other changes in vision in line with the Mandate. * Fewer beyond-Ethereum megaprojects coming from EF. As I announced earlier this year, I am taking on some of the responsibility of doing projects in this category that I consider valuable with my personal funds. * EF institutional work is reducing in scope, specializing more specifically on creating replicable test cases of highly CROPS-friendly deployments, even if at smaller scale. These do not explain all departures; in some cases they do not explain departures at all and rather explain _reduced need for new spending_. But they are a large part of the strategy at play. In the longer term, I personally favor a "soft lean-and-done" approach to Ethereum: once the Strawmap is completed, generally stick to security fixes and small high-value changes, and have a much higher bar for considering new feature additions to the protocol. This allows Ethereum to remain capture-resistant without demanding very large budgets. Learn less from multimillion-line-of-code behemoth projects, more from bitcoin. The past years have been a challenging era for Ethereum. However, the ecosystem is adapting, both inside the EF and outside, and I am confident that Ethereum is very well-positioned to succeed and thrive. firefly.social/post/x/2069408…
English
@randgroup @BRICSinfo The war looks more like a catalyst for buying and selling in these boring markets.
English
JUST IN: 🇺🇸🇮🇷 President Trump says Iran is "wrong" about there being no scheduled visit for inspectors.
"If they were right, I'd cancel the meetings right now."
English
@stacy_muur I would add Physical AI to the list as well.
English
If you’re still in crypto with zero exposure to Hyperliquid, Polymarket, neobanks, and privacy...
You should probably leave crypto once and for all.
English
@ourcryptotalk SUI's BTC bridge sounds like a game changer, no custodians needed.
English
$1.28 trillion sitting in Bitcoin wallets.
Less than 1% of it is doing anything.
$SUI just built the infrastructure to change that without touching your BTC.
Most Bitcoin DeFi solutions require you to hand your BTC to a custodian who issues a wrapped version on another chain.
That wrapped token is what you actually use.
The real Bitcoin sits somewhere with someone, and you're trusting that arrangement not to collapse, which it has, more than once.
Sui's Hashi project takes a different approach. When you deposit BTC into Hashi, the Bitcoin never leaves the Bitcoin blockchain.
The system generates a 2-of-2 multisig address tied to your Sui wallet, your BTC gets locked there, and Sui validators mint a programmable representation on Sui after confirming the deposit.
You borrow against that. You use it in lending markets. The actual coins stay on Bitcoin's native chain the entire time.
When you're done and you repay, a quorum of validators produces a threshold Schnorr signature to release your BTC.
No single party holds the key.
No centralized balance sheet.
The terms are verifiable in Move smart contracts.
The ecosystem building on top of this is getting serious.
Cumberland, SwissBorg, and Fluid just joined 20+ other institutions already building on Hashi, including BitGo, Ledger, Suilend, and CF Benchmarks.
Global testnet is in July. Mainnet follows. If this architecture works at scale, it is potentially the largest activation of dormant Bitcoin capital anyone has attempted.
The question is whether people will trust the infrastructure enough to use it.
Sui@SuiNetwork
Hashi is a native Sui primitive turning ~$1T of idle $BTC into productive financial collateral. Ahead of its global testnet launch this July, @CumberlandSays, @swissborg, and @0xfluid are the latest to join 20+ partners in the Hashi ecosystem.
English