Owlmerge

. @toly you understand that you a bitch right? So many communities out there trying and you insider pump this shit. Do better man

@FatherMeme69 @Balkanicus_ Proof unc or never happened

@Balkanicus_ A new one so none of you guys can complain when I take profits 😂

/uncmode perma bottom on $unc 100m loadingggg

@The_DexVault @STACCoverflow Yo @STACCoverflow you going to be there?

@STACCoverflow Come $PROOF with us Wednesday, legend! x.com/The_DexVault/s…

proof V3 to the moon see ya soon

@srirachaenjoyer @STACCoverflow @opnetbtc Was thinking the same thing

my first @opnetbtc deploy is successful. but no idea if it works until yall test it. my test are sitting in mempool so have at er kids it is a not a ponzi ponzi on bitcoin and the very first bitcoin ponzi probable absolutely the first opnet ponzi. rule: u send the contract moto and get 138!! tokens which burn 6.9% of that transfer an increase the redemption rate or you burn 138 tokens and it give you moto back but burns 6.9 of that transfer too. additionally there is a 6.9 transfer fee. which is only really important if people make amms and they should it’s free money and infinite volume “ the ideal quote for a shit coin casino” good luck have fun make babies ? op1sqz7lvwq5qg25zw9qq6ffutgpaku74ep9ggzlk6ed

@STACCoverflow Yo @STACCoverflow can you make a small thread what is Proofv3 what people should accept etc? From utility side

new Ath Incoming Proof V3 say it back CLWeikxiw8pC9JEtZt14fqDzYfXF7uVwLuvnJPkrE7av

@STACCoverflow Still early man! I mean when you out and utility kick in. MILLIONSSSSS

Proof V3 looking pretty good right about now. CLWeikxiw8pC9JEtZt14fqDzYfXF7uVwLuvnJPkrE7av

@STACCoverflow If solona not good? How proof will run??

i give solana another 9 months

@raychix @STACCoverflow It takes 2 months to meet your mom to make you kid. Is fine

@STACCoverflow it took 2 months to go from 0.04 to 0.05 that kind of stability is almost suspicious

token go up CLWeikxiw8pC9JEtZt14fqDzYfXF7uVwLuvnJPkrE7av

@STACCoverflow He’ll yeah LFGGG

@fibonacki I believe you might be the biggest retard on CT man 😂 First buy zhdun token say it’s better now buy the Snorp. Dumpest award is your you 100%

maybe this can do what kermit did I could identify as this guy and it's enough for me the one who waits

@fibonacki x.com/i/communities/… someone made this @fibonacki

@owlmerge no I'm just creating attention here, if people like it everything will work out

I try to keep it short here; >be bongo cat >3m+ youtube subscribes purely based on bongo content >top 5 most played steam games constantly, with your own thriving steam marketplace and digital items >original bongo coin infamously launched by popcat dev >one of bonk guys original bags before becoming bonk guy (think he still holds to this day) >ath at ~140 million, migrated to bonk to kill the token soooo I bought their original contract here at ~25k according to rugcheck everything should be ok: rugcheck.xyz/tokens/HUdqc5M… also there's more liquidity than market cap currently been screaming about bongo cat for ages so maybe it's max pain and ironic if the original contract was the way to go don't want to support bonk and their farces ever again, and neither should you

@fibonacki What you think @fibonacki

@fibonacki I can make community if someone can make a form for CTO

@fibonacki Can you short dex with a new community?

this is a super high risk bet either way just something I've been talking about for a long time also going more and more viral every single day, basically 'the internets cat meme' if you asked gamers the original contract: HUdqc5MR5h3FssESabPnQ1GTgTcPvnNudAuLj5J6a9sU

@haydenbleasel @theonomix @jestermolecule You can ez make a @phantom wallet and claim @haydenbleasel

@theonomix @jestermolecule No crypto wallet unfortunately 😭

Ok here it is: OpenReview - an open-source, self-hosted AI code review bot powered by the Vercel AI Cloud. I'm taking everything I learned building Ultracite Cloud (closing soon) and turning it into a template that we can use internally to dogfood our primitives; and you can use to build cool code review bots on GitHub! github.com/vercel-labs/op…

@EthBofanj52628 Stfu

@owlmerge Join my premium mentorship class on my trading program quickly join,those who are fully interesting,including all subscribers to my substack and newsletter Join Now 📈 urlw.com/obDqt5

In a previous post you suggested you operate in public. But then mentioned that if I would follow you, that you would respond to my DM. Then in another post said you didn't know how to access X DMs from a Blackberry phone. I'll approach this conversation with an open mind - for the betterment of the space. I have a few questions, coming from a very sincere place. Perhaps if you could answer them publicly - and if your answers are based in logical explanations - I would be open to considering implementing your design to augment the multiple strategies we are already working with. To begin with, I had @grok read every public tweet you've made over the last 30 days and summarize it all for me to make sure I was not missing a piece of the puzzle. I'm going to simplify a lot of concepts in how I phrase my questions for the benefit of our collective audiences who have commented many times on our exchanges that much of this goes over their heads. It seems your primary technology is the custom router with built in burn mechanism. While I agree this is a novel concept, and concur that @MeteoraAG would have to agree to implement it (that remains to be seen) I find myself a bit confused. Aggregators, such as Jupiter Swap and Titan, always route to the path of best execution. The burn percentage at the end of the day is simply part of the "cost of transaction" that will be taken into account by the aggregators. 1. If this program is immutable, how do you plan to scale the percentage of the buyback & burn mechanism as liquidity becomes more competitive? We all know for example that at early stages there's not much competition on liquidity and anyone can get away with a 1% fee structure. But as market cap and volume scale so will LP farmers and you'll see much more competitive fee rates. How do you plan to scale the percentage with growth on an immutable design? What works today would be vastly ignored by the aggregators (or way out of price sync) at even just 10X growth from now. How do you plan to address this? 2. When providing liquidity, the existing LP structures that exist everywhere already capture tokens as part of the fee structure when your LP position absorbs sells. I am very confused on the logic of buying back and burning on sell transactions because on sell transactions you're capturing the token to begin with - not USDC or SOL. You would be capturing USDC or SOL on purchase transactions. Only then would you have the need to buy tokens to burn. But your program is designed around "sells". Why not simply create a bot program that automatically claims the token side of fees and burns them? The only argument that can be made is MEV attacks on predictable transactions but the fees generated - even at scale - are not enough to be worthy of front-running. And even if they were front-run (they won't be) wouldn't that only be good for additional volume? The system you're describing sounds like an incredible marketing gimmick, but when I compare it to how the real world already works I find myself confused at what the true value add is? How is doing it this way add any meaningful impact vs just harvesting fees and using them to benefit your eco? 3. You've decided to operate in a constant product pool that is locked. Besides the inherent issues with constant product pools (and how they are ultimately responsible for most of the rug-shaped surprises in this space) the challenge you're going to face is that anyone farming fees in tight ranges can easily over-ride your pool selection with better depth at current prices. For example at a market cap of 5M a CLMM pool with a +- 5% range would only need around $8,000 in liquidity to walk all over the current size of your constant product pool. This means selection of your pool as a route for aggregators would be dramatically impacted. At a 10M MCAP less than $12,000 is needed. Even at a 1B mcap a simple $100K in a CLMM in a +- 5% range would easily vamp the majority of the volume away from your pool on how aggregators would actually route. That would only be made worse if your fee structure remained unchanged (see question 1). With these facts in mind, what was the thought process behind selecting a constant product pool design vs programatic deployment of concentrated liquidity in laddered bands? We know anywhere where true volume exists, LP farmers come out of the woodwork. I'm really curious how you you intend to capture much of that volume on the constant product pool foundation. 4. What are your projections for how meaningful this will actually be, besides from a marketing gimmick? Because I can tell you that the majority of our DEX volume comes from arb bots and perps hedge bots. But even at our daily volume the amount generated in fees is minimal. And we already use those fees for buybacks (not burns, as that messes with mcap). How do you see this making a meaningful impact to your token holders, knowing that with even really high consistent volume that ultimately the fees generated at scale (when in competition with every other liquidity provider out there) are nominal at best? 5. Making a token deflationary by using any form or variety of swap fees is something that is widely done among a lot of projects. How are you addressing the core "broken system" that allows for cheap accumulation at early stages that then provide the charts with "rug-shaped" surprises at later stages because that's the core shape of the PumpSwap liquidity structure. I believe that addressing deflationary measures without getting to the heart of what drives the brokeness of this space is akin to putting a band-aid on a cancer patient. I would love to hear your thoughts and what plans you have to address this. I sincerely look forward to your detailed reply. This isn't about ego. It's not about who's right. It's about what's best for the space. And the best idea always has to prevail.

I will release the files as regular google drive uploads in a little bit. Didn’t realize it was a zip and so many of you would be scared to open, lol - on it.

@STACCoverflow @WhiteWhaleLabs Yo @WhiteWhaleLabs

- I agree, the composibility is mostly squared on most of the major amm providers, and the aggregators will behave as they do, but it really depends on the arbitragers correcting the price discrepancy from stake pools to amms. - we don’t need depth given the redemption rate and peg to actual sol. people who mint/ burn through stake pools will always get a better rate than amms in any case in my vision. - it will have to be a matter of controlling the narrative. It’s not so much artificial inflation as it is value accrual in the quote which translates to actually more value in the memes over time. ty for your feedback, I genuinely appreciate it and I may be wrong on some of my points and I’m open for discussion. cheers!

@stellarbased @STACCoverflow Only token @STACCoverflow is with is this CLWeikxiw8pC9JEtZt14fqDzYfXF7uVwLuvnJPkrE7av And it’s called proofv3

@STACCoverflow This your wallet? 7M7UfkwP1tp5wBmMWMN8nXfN1VpfXHmcY8X3Dm8g2ixU

PUBLIC STATEMENT REGARDING RELEASE OF WHISTLEBLOWING RELATED COMMUNICATIONS I am a former member of the Pumpdotfun development team and a well-known developer in the broader Solana ecosystem. I am releasing my personal Telegram chats. The communications speak for themselves. I am releasing this information publicly because I have concerns about my physical safety due to my role as a whistleblower. I am making these materials public so that I am no longer the sole holder of them and no longer a target. I am coming forward voluntarily and without compensation of any kind. I have not been promised anything by any party in connection with this release. No conditions were placed on my cooperation, and none have been placed on this disclosure. I reserve all rights and protections available to me under applicable federal and state law. This release is made voluntarily, in good faith, and in the public interest. Jarett Dunn 3/3/2026 drive.google.com/drive/folders/…

@fibonacki Yeah now be a man a join bongo community

best bagworkers are the ones who happen to find the 'og' with 0 volume from 2014 they have the clearest intents, pure by heart