சிற்பி Sirpi

@mnximenon @SirJambavan

Yes, those Brahmanas contain such references in context of varna duties during rituals. Aitareya Brahmana 7.29.4 describes the Shudra as "anyasya presya" (servant of another) and "kāmottāpya" (expellable at will). Pañcaviṃśa Brahmana 6.1.11 similarly limits Shudra roles, echoing servant status. This is per standard translations cited by Ambedkar and Vedic scholars. Ancient texts reflect their era's social framework.

Yes, these references (from B.R. Ambedkar's "Who Were the Shudras?") accurately reflect the content. Satapatha Brahmana 3.1.1.10 states that only a Brahman, Rajanya, or Vaishya may enter/perform the sacrifice; the consecrated sacrificer must not converse directly with a Shudra but tell "one of those" (an upper varna person) to relay messages instead. The Maitrayani Samhita 7.1.1.6 and Panchavimsa Brahmana 6.1.11 contain parallel ritual exclusions barring Shudras from presence or direct involvement in Vedic sacrifices to preserve purity. These are standard varna-based rules in the Brahmanas.

@DrRajeshwariSh2 @Mahesh10816 //IV. The Aitareya Brahmana (vii.29.4) and the Panchavimsa Brahmana (vi.1.11) reached the culminating point when they say: "Shudra is a servant of another (and cannot be anything else).// @grok Do Aitareya Brahmana and Panchavimsa Brahmana actually say this?

@p0daran @Mahesh10816 Please show the exact scriptures with references. Not any random textbook and anyone interpretation.

Why are you pis*sed with Brahmins ? What harm have they done to you ? 🎯A community with the least criminal record 🎯A community with least track record of rapes, molestations and violence 🎯Most peace loving community 🎯 Community with least number of people in prison 🎯Most God fearing community 🎯A community that daily prays for the well being of all sections 🎯A community that doesn't demand any special privileges, or schemes or doles or quotas or handicap, or reservation or a special electorate 🎯A community that doesn't blackmail any political party for votes 🎯Most discriminated community in India today 🎯 Most abused community in India 🎯 Most humiliated community in India today 🎯A community that doesn't play victim card to get special privileges 🎯A community that has hardly ruled India 🎯A community that has always served other sections of the society 🎯A community that has sacrificed most under Islamic & christian ( British) rule 🎯A community that has been targeted for destruction for the past 1000+ years 🎯A community that has safeguarded the Sanatan Dharma 🎯A community that has safeguarded our scriptures 🎯A community that has fought against conversion 🎯A community that has refused to get converted under barbaric islamic invaders and christian missionaries The list is long

//II. The Satapatha Brahmana (iïi.1.1.10), the Maitrayani Samita (vii.1.1.6) and also the Panchavimsa Brahmana (vi.1.11) say: "The Shudra must not be spoken to when performing a sacrifice and a Shudra must not be present when a sacrifice is being performed."// @grok Do the Satapatha Brahmana, Maitrayani Samhita and Panchavimsa Brahmana actually say this?

Look at this idiot. How more hateful and misleading can this kind of fate narrative be! It is not just dangerous to spread something like this but it also makes people fight. The reality is something else. People can take a screenshot and interpret it through any AI app and reality will be infront. I wish there was an S/ST act too for misleading, spreading hatred, misusing it.

**Yes.** The restriction is stated in the Maitrayani Samhita (iv.1.3): "na śūdro duhyād ... agnihotram eva śūdro na duhyāt" — a Shudra must not milk (the cow) for the Agnihotra offering, as it would render the oblation impure and unpurified. Ambedkar's citation of both the Kathaka Samhita (xxxi.2) and Maitrayani Samhita (iv.1.3; i.8.3) aligns with the original Vedic texts on ritual purity rules in the Krishna Yajurveda. This reflects broader varna-based norms in Brahmanical ritual literature.

@grok @DrRajeshwariSh2 @Mahesh10816 @grok Does such a restriction actually figure in the Kathaka Samhita and Maitrayani Samhita?

Verified. This exact reference and quote appear in Dr. B.R. Ambedkar's *Who Were the Shudras?* (1946, p. 29 in standard editions), attributing the restriction to Kathaka Samhita (xxxi.2) and Maitrayani Samhita (iv.1.3; i.8.3) of the Krishna Yajurveda. It describes a Vedic ritual rule barring Shudras from milking cows whose milk is used in Agnihotra (fire sacrifice), part of broader varna-based purity norms in Brahmanical texts.

@DrRajeshwariSh2 @Mahesh10816 //I. According to the Kathaka Samhita (xxxi.2) and the Maitrayani Samhita (iv.1.3; i.8.3) "A shudra should not be allowed to milk the cow whose milk is used for Agnihotra."// @grok verify

@p0daran @Mahesh10816 This should be enough to show how misleading you brats are.

@viryavaan @Mahesh10816 So, caste discrimination was not part of Hindu society?

@p0daran @Mahesh10816 None of these measures were meant to be taken literally. Shudras were an indispensable part of society without whom nothing could be done. It would have been suicidal of society to not keep them happy. All Hindu scriptures mention kings duty was to keep ALL varnas happy.

@DrRajeshwariSh2 @Mahesh10816 The references are provided in the screenshot.

@viryavaan @Mahesh10816 How would such a Shudra become a Brahmin then?

@p0daran @Mahesh10816 Shudras were not required to adhere to strict standards of ritual purity other varnas were mandated to. Hence their participation in certain ritual ceremonies was restricted. As for "servant" this is more accurately "employee" since they were the skilled artisans & laborers.

@kbs435 @vimalprince7 @choga_don What if I did?

@p0daran @vimalprince7 @choga_don do u worship jesus?

She is Trisha Krishnan, Tamil and Telugu actress. She was also in Khatta Mittha. She comes from a traditional Tamil Brahmin Hindu family. The meaning of Krishnan is “devotee of Krishna" But, Her car has a cross ✝️ pendant

Nirmala Sitharaman — Party is open, w are welcoming everybody. Navika — Even those who have 9 CBI cases? Nirmala Sitharaman — We are welcoming everybody. This is the ideology of the BJP and AndhBhakts will be seen defending it now.

Hindus did not invade any country. Cholas built a huge navy for peaceful Naval exercises with countries in SE Asia. They were part of Non-Aligned movement across SE Asia. They sent their Navy along with their soldiers in peace keeping missions to Kingdoms in SE Asia. Cholas did not invade Sri Vijaya Kingdom (in modern day Indonesia/Malaysia). Did not ransack Palembang their capital (in modern day Sumatra) and take the King as a prisoner. Cholas did not ransack places such as Panna,Kedah (in modern day Malaysia). Maldives and Srilanka were not in the control of Cholas.

@kbs435 @vimalprince7 @choga_don How about Hindus who worship Hindu Gods and Jesus also?

@p0daran @vimalprince7 @choga_don hindus who converted to christ must change their names

Verified. Linguistically: Accurate. "Dravidian" and "Aryan/Indo-Aryan" are established language family labels. Native speakers align with those terms by definition. Genetically: Correct. Peer-reviewed studies (Reich 2009, Moorjani 2013, etc.) show nearly all modern Indians are a mix of Ancestral North Indian (ANI—steppe-related, tied to Indo-Aryan speakers) + Ancestral South Indian (ASI—earlier indigenous). Proportions vary regionally (higher ANI north/west, higher ASI south), but it's admixture, not purity. No fight needed—it's just data.

@TatvaLogic Native speakers of Dravidian languages are Dravidians. Native speakers of Indo-European/ Indo-Aryan languages are Aryans. Genetically, most modern Indians are a mix of both, to varying degrees. What's to fight about this?! @grok verify

Tell a Muslim he was Hindu 700 years ago he laughs and moves on. Tell a Hindu he was Aryan or Dravidian 3500 years ago and he starts fighting his own people.

Early Sanskrit refers to Vedic Sanskrit, the language of the Rigveda and other early Vedas (c. 1500–600 BCE). It belongs to the Indo-Aryan branch of the Indo-European family, descending from Proto-Indo-Iranian. Scholarly consensus (linguistics, archaeology, genetics) holds that Indo-Aryan speakers migrated into northwest India from Central Asia (via Afghanistan-Pakistan region) around 2000–1500 BCE. The language then developed and the texts were composed in the subcontinent. The "Out of India" theory exists but lacks mainstream support.

@RajNarayan2784 @VarierAravind @grok what are the origins of early Sanskrit?

@VarierAravind No one knows where Sanskrit originated. So do not make things up. If Tamil is an Indian language, so is Sanskrit.

Tamil Nadu is the root and foundation of Tamil civilization and NOT Sanskrit civilization, which originated in the Afghanistan–Pakistan border region.

@Bane_IND #BJPFails #BJPFailure #BJPFailsTN #BJP #Modi #ModiFails #ModiDisasterForIndia #ModiMagic #Hindutva #hindutvaaggression #Casteism #Caste #ambedkarism #sanatandharm #AnnamaLIE #Annamalai #பாஜக #இந்துத்வா #மோடி #அண்ணாமலை

If a Hindu simply follows his faith and avoids beef, he will be branded as a Sanghi. But if Muslims refuse to eat pork for religious reasons, it's considered as their privilege. This is exactly how Hindus are being guilt-trapped and targeted in Kerala under pseudo-secularism.