Patrick
185 posts
seedance prompt：
Presented in the style of unprocessed, handheld, shaky iPhone video footage, all camera settings are automatic, with no post-processing color grading or effects. The footage captures the realistic breathing of the operator and slight, irregular hand shake. Autofocus frequently exhibits intense searching, brief out-of-focus periods, and delayed recovery. Auto white balance naturally shifts between warm and cool tones as the cool fluorescent lights inside the public transportation vehicle mix with the light from outside the window. The image is generally flat and slightly washed out, retaining realistic lens flare, slight motion blur, and optical imperfections such as watermarks at the edges. A natural orange retro film-like timestamp "06 05 92" appears in the lower left corner of the image. Only natural ambient sound effects (low rumble of a subway/bus, slight vibrations in the carriage, and the sound of fabric rubbing) are used, with no background music. Microphone distortion is slight at louder frequencies. A pure first-person POV perspective (the subjective viewpoint of the voyeur) is employed, with camera movement entirely following the operator's instinctive reactions. The composition is occasionally imperfect, showing realistic breathing tremors and slight shaking during moments of tension. From 0-2 seconds, the camera focuses on a first-person perspective from a seat opposite the female protagonist, lingering on a medium shot inside a public transportation vehicle (subway/bus). A young Asian woman with long, straight, flowing black hair is shown sitting on a blue seat, her arms naturally crossed over her chest. Her clothing is described.
An orange retro timestamp "06 05 92" appears naturally on the left side of the frame. The background shows a bright yellow textured handrail and cool-toned fluorescent lighting. The autofocus is stable and locked on the woman, with slight hand-shake and vehicle vibrations. From 2-5 seconds, the woman realizes she is being filmed and suddenly looks directly at the camera. She slowly raises her left hand, grasps her collar, and pulls her top up to a more concealing style, the movement fluid and natural. Her gaze shifts from calm and composed to slightly provocative, but ultimately reveals concern. She wears large silver hoop earrings, and a black phone and a black leather bag with a metal chain rest on her lap. The autofocus briefly searches and locks on the woman's movement as she pulls up her collar, the image slightly shaky, yet clearly capturing the subtle sound of fabric rubbing against skin. The deep rumble of a vehicle continues throughout. The footage possesses a realistic, unprocessed handheld video quality, a documentary-level natural imperfection, without any post-processing color grading or special effects. All camera behavior conforms to the physical characteristics of iPhone automatic shooting.
English
@suanrongyouyuxu 華語流行音樂第三人差不多，陶喆第一，王力宏第二。只不過他倆以前在美國呆過，知道如何正確採樣。周杰倫都是改幾個小節，然後用在副歌。你不能說他抄了，也不能說純原創。
中文
我觉得周杰伦是一面镜子。作为一个成名早，且还在活跃的艺人，从他身上可以折射出前社交媒体时代和后社交媒体时代的舆论变迁。
我现在看到两个比较出圈的言论，一个说周杰伦的中国风是假的，方文山才是真的，另一个是周杰伦是抄袭的。两者讲的都不是今天的事。那为什么过去二十多年没人提呢？
两者当然都很扯淡。先说第一个。周杰伦民族主义情结从刚出道还没和方文山合作的时候就是了，听过早期专辑的都知道。但架不住新一代的年轻人只闻其名不见其人，只听说过有一个过气的华语流行天王，听过几首耳熟能详的歌，但肯定没认真了解过。接着撞上了民族主义这个痛点——我记得在当时，中国风甚至是一个很稀奇的东西。更古早的时候市场上虽然也有一些中国传统的内容，但是并没有形成风格，也没有专门和流行文化进行过融合。
但今天不一样了，今天是一个中国跟西方高度对立的时代，要搞中国风就必须要跟西方进行切割。那周杰伦就很尴尬了，因为他明显是一个同时有着两套气质的人，既有中国民族主义的一面，但技法上又很明显有着西方古典主义的那一套。我们以前管那叫融会贯通，中西合璧，今天已经行不通了，高低得扣个崇洋媚外的帽子。而且现代流行文化本来就是西方来的，稍早一点的搞流行文化的，有一个算一个都是从西方汲取灵感的。再说现在一些人嘴上说着那一套中国如何西方如何的话，也没见几个人真的去听京剧和黄梅戏的。
说周杰伦抄袭的视频我也刷到了，懒得点进去看。虽然我个人对周杰伦是有所保留的，但很长一段时间周被人认为是华语乐坛第一人，盯着的眼睛多着呢。而且流行乐门槛很低，听的人多，从业者也不少，要抄袭老早就被人挖出来了。郭敬明抄袭没被人第一时间看出来，是因为有点文学素养的人是真看不下整本小说的。但听个流行歌曲听不出抄袭，那就有点看不起那么多从业者了。
早期没有短视频，没有算法分发的时代，讨论是有门槛的。媒体、乐评人、乐坛内部人士起了筛选作用，所以过于低质的内容就被过滤掉了。但现在这层东西没了，谁都能上台说几句...所以只能说不意外。我们以后还能看到更多，更奇怪的东西。
中文
@xinwendiaocha 有些视频很奇怪 就是拍视频的人是谁 而且镜头是移动的 那就是说 视频是人为的拍摄的 说明了什么问题，1视频是被导演设计的 2 就是拍摄者的心态 演员的心态？
中文
一对年轻夫妇在他们年幼的女儿面前争吵。男人开始殴打女人的脸，揪她的头发，掐她的脖子。当小女儿跟他说话时，他的怒火戛然而止，这时女人开始反击。 x.com/newsfeed_1996/…
中文
中文
