pal9999

83.6K posts

pal9999

pal9999

@pal9999

サッカーブログやってます。

湘南のチベット Katılım Nisan 2007
440 Takip Edilen9.9K Takipçiler
pal9999
pal9999@pal9999·
AIにしろロボットにしろランニングコストがよくわかってないからねえ(棒読み)
日本語
0
0
3
1.3K
pal9999 retweetledi
Ricardo
Ricardo@Ric_RTP·
Microsoft just banned its own engineers from using AI. The tool was literally costing MORE than the humans it was supposed to replace. They lied to you about AI adoption and now the whole narrative is blowing up: Microsoft gave thousands of engineers access to Claude Code six months ago and encouraged them to use it. Engineers loved it and adoption exploded. But then the invoices arrived. Token-based pricing means every query, every code review, every debugging session costs money. At scale across 100,000 engineers, the numbers became so large that Microsoft issued an internal order to cancel nearly all Claude Code licenses by end of June and force everyone onto their own cheaper tool instead. The company that invested $5 billion in Anthropic just told its own people to stop using Anthropic's product because it costs too much. Uber's story is even worse... Their CTO Praveen Neppalli Naga told The Information that the budget he planned for the full year was "blown away already" by April. Uber had rolled out Claude Code in December 2025. By March, 84% of their 5,000 engineers were using it with 70% of all committed code coming from AI systems. Heavy users were burning $500 to $2,000 per month each. Naga himself spent $1,200 in a single two-hour demo session. The company had even built internal leaderboards ranking engineers by how much AI they used. They literally gamified the spending and then ran out of money. Now look at what Nvidia's own VP of applied deep learning Bryan Catanzaro said to Axios last month. Direct quote: "For my team, the cost of compute is far beyond the costs of the employees." This is a VP at the company that SELLS the chips saying that using AI is more expensive than paying humans. Think about what this means for the entire AI narrative. Every CEO on every earnings call for the past two years has said the same thing: AI will make us more efficient, reduce headcount, and cut costs. The stock market rewarded every company that said it. Fired workers, stock goes up. Announced AI adoption, stock goes up. But the actual companies deploying AI at scale are discovering the math doesn't work. The MORE employees use AI, the HIGHER the bill. Goldman Sachs forecasts a 24x increase in token consumption by 2030 as companies adopt AI agents. Gartner just published a report showing that even though individual token prices will drop 90% by 2030, total enterprise AI costs will go UP because agents consume exponentially more tokens per task than basic tools. Meta built an internal dashboard called "Claudeonomics" to track which employees use the most AI. Amazon started pushing engineers to "tokenmaxx," their internal term for consuming as many AI tokens as possible. Both companies are spending hundreds of billions on AI infrastructure this year alone. And Microsoft, the company that bet its entire future on AI, just told 100,000 engineers to stop using the tool they liked best because the per-token bills got out of control. The companies building AI are telling investors it saves money. The companies using AI are finding out it costs more than the humans it was supposed to replace. And even the company that makes the chips just admitted it through its own VP. This is the gap nobody on Wall Street is pricing in. $725 billion in AI infrastructure spending this year across Big Tech. And the first companies to actually deploy these tools at scale are already pulling back because the economics don't work. What do you think?
English
1.8K
9K
22.3K
2.7M
pal9999 retweetledi
Ted
Ted@TedPillows·
Someone has opened a $16,700,000 Oil short today. Insider or gambler?
Ted tweet media
English
328
288
2.7K
391.7K
pal9999
pal9999@pal9999·
マジで胡散くせー。トランプのインサイダーの匂いしかしない、一連のニュース。
日本語
0
6
14
2.9K
pal9999
pal9999@pal9999·
すげえ大規模なインサイダーの匂いがプンプンする
日本語
0
0
5
2.3K
pal9999
pal9999@pal9999·
これは俺の予想だけど、トランプはイランと停戦の合意を取り付けてもすぐには発表せず、売りを仕込む。 その後、イランに対して大規模な攻撃(核を含む)の予告を行い、合意は反故にされたといって市場にパニックを陥れて、利確。 その後で底値で買いをいれてから、合意を発表。市場は当然反発。反発したら利確。 これで往復で取る気だろうよ。
The Kobeissi Letter@KobeissiLetter

BREAKING: The US and Iran are closing in on a deal that would extend their ceasefire by 60 days and lay the framework for discussions on Iran's nuclear program, mediators say. Details include: 1. This would include a "gradual reopening" of the Strait of Hormuz 2. It would also include a commitment to discussing the "diluting or handing over" of Iran's highly enrich uranium 3. The US would ease its blockade of the Strait of Hormuz and agree to sanctions relief 4. The US would also begin a phased unfreezing of Iran's assets Both sides are nearing a "memorandum of understanding" to extend a ceasefire.

日本語
37
861
3.2K
715.6K
pal9999
pal9999@pal9999·
株に最高値つけさせてからイラン攻撃か 儲かって仕方ねぇだろうなトランプ
日本語
0
5
41
3.3K
pal9999
pal9999@pal9999·
ああ、イランか
日本語
0
0
1
1.5K
pal9999
pal9999@pal9999·
金利下がらないのに株だけ上がり続けるのは構造的に持続しないぞ、本当に金利下がるんだろうな???
日本語
0
0
1
1.6K
pal9999 retweetledi
Lawrence Lepard, "fix the money, fix the world"
This used to be my pinned Tweet. The blue line (GDP) generates income to service the debt in the red line (All Sector Debt). See the problem? It is just math.
Lawrence Lepard, "fix the money, fix the world" tweet media
English
100
228
1.3K
59.5K
pal9999
pal9999@pal9999·
本当に金利下がるのこれ?
日本語
0
0
0
1.4K
pal9999
pal9999@pal9999·
すげえ相場だな、金利が上がり続けてるのに株価はロケットしてる。
日本語
1
1
3
1.7K