حمزة الحنفي

@farwasaidwhat ibr i got no clue what you mean merri jaan but it sounds like you’re cursing the enemies of ‘ali رضي الله عنه so go off unshaven woman

@paleohanafi Bar dushman e Murtaza Ali lanattttt

Always used to wonder if people are openly nasebi… aur ye mil gaya

@farwasaidwhat i wouldn’t even lay my hands on you if you begged, id give you a shaving stick though

@paleohanafi Lol yeah sure as if the lanat on his enemies didn’t trigger you

@TheMuslimTheist those today who have baab al ijtihad open to them and are upon what those tab’in did would be excused with ‘udhr bil ta’wil the same exact way those tab’in were excused for it too. once iqamat al hujjah is placed then it would lead to their tabd/takfir

@paleohanafi Okay consider those today who insult sahabah to have ta'wil and a valid ijtihad. They are following books and aqwaal of the salaf who had these ijtihadaat.

This guy casually doing la3nah on Sahabah who attacked Mu'awiyah (physically and verbally).

@TheMuslimTheist the tabi’n who insulted any one of the sahabah out of ta’wil wouldn’t be sinful if they had valid ijtihad such as if they were in war with them on either side. but in its asl it’s still fisq

@paleohanafi Go ahead and show me the hadith were the Prophet details which rulings apply to sahabah and which ones apply to tabi3een thereafter. More importantly, the dilemma I put still applies if there is a difference regarding this specific ruling. So are tabi3een fussaaq?

@TheMuslimTheist that’s already a false dichotomy, it’s not two shariahs rather it’s specific rulings upon each individual depending on their scenario. the same way that those who lived during the time of isa who believed he was crucified weren’t sinful but if we do then we’re kufār.

@paleohanafi Are there two shariahs, a) one for Sahabah and one for non-Sahabah, or b) is there one shariah? If insulting a sahabi is fisq then Under a) it would apply to the tabi3een who insulted sahabi & fought them. Under b) it would apply to the sahabah themselves first and foremost.

@farwasaidwhat this is what happens when you don’t have access to shaving sticks, the hair grows internally within your noggin which doesn’t contain a brain

Does your mind also randomly go “bar dushman-e-Murtaza Ali lanat,” or is it just mine?

GodLogic’s Blaspheming Wife Is a Whore ? INSANE Video Revealed youtu.be/p5kHJDQd-Hk

@thesurepath1 note that this is if he switches for a worldly reason, as ibn abidin expands upon in his hashiyyah

When it was revealed that the Taliban has banned laymen from switching madhhab, many people asked what the reasoning was, so here it is from the book *The Islamic Emirate and its System*; “If a follower (muqallid) of one madhhab switches to another madhhab, he should be punished with taʿzīr (discretionary punishment), as is mentioned in al-Hindiyyah (1/292). This is because such an act treats religion as a plaything, and it is not permissible.”

whoever this abdul khaliq guy is from the uae needs to be stopped from going on podcasts

@mir53381 @mk_muwahid that’s funny considering all the muhadithin have said otherwise, even those who affirm the jarh on abu hanifah رضي الله عنه wouldn’t even agree 😂 abu hanifah was a mushadid in ‘Ilm al hadith and was very strict on authenticating rawis… unlike yahya al khurafat on the other hand

@paleohanafi @mk_muwahid He definitely has more ilm of hadith than Abu Hanifa

𝗞𝗵𝗮𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗿𝗮𝗵 (84) The Claim That Shaykh Al-Albani Was Overly Lenient and Shaykh Muqbil Overly Strict in Hadith Grading Question: It is said about Shaykh Nasir Ad-Din Al-Albani that he was lenient in his authentication and weakening of hadiths, and about Shaykh Muqbil that he was overly severe. How true are these statements? Sheikh Yahya Al-Hajoori As for the claim that Shaykh Al-Albani was lenient in authentication and weakening—this is incorrect. How could that be? He never weakened a hadith without providing clear evidence for its weakness. He was extremely meticulous in weakening hadiths. His book Silsilah Adh-Da’ifah (The Chain of Weak Hadiths) stands as a testament to this, showing his great precision. Regarding authentication, he would sometimes exercise his own reasoning (ijtihad) on certain hadiths, citing various chains and applying his own methodological principles. He might say, "This hadith, through these chains, is hasan in my view." This is similar to what Al-Hafidh Ibn Hajar does in Bulugh Al-Maram, where he says, "This hadith is hasan," even though some other hadith masters or researchers may disagree. The same can be said for Az-Zayla’i and other scholars—this is a normal matter of scholarly difference. It is true that some hadiths in Silsilah As-Sahihah (The Chain of Authentic Hadiths) which he deemed authentic are not accepted by some other scholars. However, in reality, his ijtihad was very strong, and he provided the Muslim Ummah with an immense treasure that neither a scholar nor a student can do without. He remains a mujtahid, like other mujtahids in the field of hadith. A student of knowledge should still examine the hadiths, even those found in Silsilah As-Sahihah or Irwa’ Al-Ghalil, and form their own conclusion based on what they see, even if it aligns with Shaykh Al-Albani’s ruling. If a student feels they have not reached the level to judge a hadith as hasan or sahih as the Shaykh did, they can simply hold their own informed opinion. And all praise is due to Allah, the Lord of the worlds. As for the claim that Shaykh Muqbil was severe in authentication and weakening—there is no doubt that he was extremely meticulous. The "severity" here simply refers to his rigorous precision. Shaykh Muqbil would scrutinise many hadiths in light of hidden defects (‘ilal). I once asked him directly: "O Shaykh, the hadiths you included in As-Sahih Al-Musnad, did you examine them for hidden defects?" He replied, "I mostly examine them for hidden defects." He continued this practice throughout his life, constantly reviewing As-Sahih Al-Musnad against books of ‘ilal. If Al-Hafidh Ad-Daraqutni, Abu Hatim, Abu Zur’ah, Al-Hafidh Ibn Hajar, or any of the hadith masters stated that a hadith had a defect, Shaykh Muqbil would either remove it from his collection or keep it with a note indicating its defect. In my observation, the criticisms regarding authentication directed at our Shaykh (Muqbil), may Allah have mercy on him, are far fewer than those directed at Shaykh Al-Albani. This is worth noting, considering the vast number of hadiths that Shaykh Al-Albani ruled upon compared to the number that our Shaykh ruled upon. إجابات الشيخ على الاسئلة الجزائرية مستلة من رسالته الإفتاء على أسئلة واردة من دول شتى t.me/khawaaaaatir/1…

Quran teacher: *keeps correcting me on little mistakes* 8 year old me making hand gestures under the table:

@SchnitzelKroos now you’re takfiring the manga authors 😭😭😭

@paleohanafi are u even a muslim the manga authors don't deserve takfir? fear Allah

for some reason, @SchnitzelKroos reads cringe gay manga instead of reading the scans he posts. then he goes on to self takfir himself

@SchnitzelKroos mr wannabe maghrebi (secretly kashmiri) is saying i need ‘aql

@paleohanafi may Allah grant you some aql u need it badly

@ahadsoab @CSKified they don’t disagree with me, you’re quoting hanafi scholars not knowing i quoted someone they wouldn’t dare to look in the eyes 😂 and regardless if they do or do not agree, the point still stands. what ibn abdul wahhab says is valid, some scholars do isithlal in the name of fiqh

@CSKified @paleohanafi @Uqasha_08 I have many differences with ahmad raza khan but ask ahlul ilim about him and surely you would know he wasn’t just a normal guy but a great mujtahid

To those that oppose the da’wah of Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahhab and accuse him of being a “takfiri”, know this: 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗱𝗮ʿ𝘄𝗮𝗵 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝗰𝗼𝗿𝗿𝗲𝗰𝘁, 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗳𝗹𝗼𝘄𝗲𝗱 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝗶𝘁 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝗰𝗼𝗿𝗿𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗷𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗳𝗶𝗲𝗱!

@Jdxdd1356 arabs are still superior

1) Boasting about lineage is a trait of Jahliyya polytheists. There are many evidences on nationalism being discouraged and kufr. This is the Persian Hujjat Al-Islam, saying it's a despicable trait that is ingrained in his (ugly) soul.

@thelifeoffneeha nope, the scholars say the ones born upon the haqq and remain on it are better than those who joined later. an example is taken in the superiority of the sahabah. the further their islam was from the first revelation, the lower their rank went if not accompanied by other traits

Reverts are better muslims than us.

@ahadsoab @CSKified @Uqasha_08 yes some people have permitted what is haram and vice versa under the name of fiqh, that isn’t incorrect and even us hanafis from our scholars like al sakhawi say this in relative to those who permitted anal under the guise of fiqh and how sakhawi viewed that to be kufr

@CSKified @Uqasha_08 (They have taken their scholars and monks as lords besides Allah ) The Messenger of Allah ﷺ and the Imams after him interpreted this verse as what you call 'Fiqh', and it is what Allah called shirk.

@Deenresponds hey donkey, there’s only one goalpost and it hasn’t moved from being up your ass 😂

@paleohanafi Look at how you shifted the goal post like the little dog you are stay down little dog i know it hurts.

Yes like how ibn kathir says so as well and his teacher and many other classical scholars. Life has you guys regurgitating 2020 slop