Pamela Russell

4.1K posts

Pamela Russell banner
Pamela Russell

Pamela Russell

@pamrustweet

RN,BSc (Hons) @ulsteruni /Practice Education Facilitator/@setrust/#QIFellowship /Professional account. Retweets not endorsements.

Katılım Mart 2018
764 Takip Edilen612 Takipçiler
Pamela Russell retweetledi
NIPEC
NIPEC@NIPEC_online·
Webinar 1pm 27 March find out about New Regional Standards for Person-centred Nursing and . Midwifery Documentation. Webinar with Linda Kelly, Chief Executive, NIPEC,;Gary Cousins, Senior Professional Officer, NIPEC; Dullaghan, Assistant Director of Nursing, Safe and Effective Care, SEHSCT and Fiona O’Neill, Chief Nursing and Midwifery Information Officer,NHSCT @Lindak973 @Cousins_Gary forms.office.com/Pages/Response…...
NIPEC tweet media
English
0
4
5
295
Pamela Russell retweetledi
South Eastern Trust
Our Cancer Clinical Nurse Specialists are a lifeline for patients and families navigating cancer ❤️ Patient Stewart Rainey describes them as “completely invaluable.” Thank you for the care, guidance and support you give every day. 🫶 #CancerClinicalNurseSpecialistDay
English
0
2
5
435
Pamela Russell retweetledi
South Eastern Trust
South Eastern Trust@setrust·
Huge congrats to our Healthcare in Prison team & partners in the @NIPrisons 🎉 Our ‘Ask HIM’ project has won the Patient & Community Engagement Award at the Institute for Healthcare Improvement Forum…. selected from 256 global submissions! Outstanding 🏆⭐️
South Eastern Trust tweet media
English
1
3
16
574
South Eastern Trust
South Eastern Trust@setrust·
After almost 40 years in nursing, Niamh Elliott from Paediatrics has retired ❤️ A dedicated nurse, trusted colleague and friend who brought warmth, laughter and incredible knowledge to the ward every day. Wishing you a very happy retirement! 🌟
South Eastern Trust tweet media
English
1
1
7
566
Pamela Russell retweetledi
Ulster Rugby
Ulster Rugby@UlsterRugby·
Doing us proud 🙌
Ulster Rugby tweet media
English
54
139
3.2K
191.6K
Pamela Russell
Pamela Russell@pamrustweet·
When focusing on development consider the aspect of ‘unlearning cultures’ during times of uncertainty - competence (doing things well) vs capacity (staying present when action will not resolve tension) Don’t rush for quick answer’s - take time to pause and reflect 💡
Helen Bevan@HelenBevan

To thrive and survive as a change or improvement leader in a big system, we need to be competent. We need to be able to redesign processes, apply improvement methods, analyse data, mobilise teams & achieve outcomes. A February 2026 HBR article by Annie Peshkam (“To lead through uncertainty, unlearn your assumptions”) says that this isn’t enough. She distinguishes between “competence” (doing things well) and “capacity” (staying present when action will not resolve the tension). As change and improvement leaders, we have invested heavily in competence: QI methods, governance, pathways, PMO disciplines. We have invested far less in capacity: the inner steadiness, emotional regulation and shared sensemaking that allow us to hold complexity with our teams. Capacity is the ability to pause instead of jumping to solutions; say out loud what is difficult about a change; keep conflict in the room and work with it rather than pushing it into the “meeting after the meeting”. The systems we work in are in sustained uncertainty: financial pressure, workforce depletion, reform agendas, unrelenting demand. Deloitte's Global Human Capital Trends survey of 14,000 leaders found that, in this context, we must look beyond efficiency and predictable results and instead elevate resilience, adaptability, and human connection. Yet our improvement/performance approaches still reward leaders who give quick answers, project confidence and absorb team anxiety. These assumptions shrink rather than expand our capacity to lead. How can change and improvement leaders build capacity? 1) Embed personal practices of pause and reflection into our leadership routines, especially in "high‑stakes" meetings. 2) Start key conversations by naming the tension in the room and giving people time to speak to it before moving to plans. 3) Design our improvement structures (huddles, steering groups, programme boards etc) as “holding environments”, where disagreement and emotion are legitimate data, not distractions. 4) Stop carrying the burden alone: share sensemaking work with our teams, service users and communities, and make that sharing visible. 5) Invest in development focused on emotional steadiness, presence and curiosity, alongside the technical disciplines of QI and "change management". We talk a lot about learning cultures. This article challenges us to cultivate unlearning cultures in addition. The shift from competence to capacity is not a “nice to do”; it is central to our ability to lead change and improvement in the face of relentless uncertainty. hbr.org/2026/02/to-lea…

English
0
0
0
60
Pamela Russell retweetledi
The Center for Leadership Studies
Psychological safety is built moment by moment. It grows when people consistently feel heard, respected, and valued.
English
0
1
1
28
Pamela Russell
Pamela Russell@pamrustweet·
✅Structure learning huddles as a change team to focus on “What are we learning? What needs to change in our approach? What should we stop?”. ✅The first rule of being an effective change agent is that “you can’t be an effective change agent on your own”.
Helen Bevan@HelenBevan

Being able to walk away from a change initiative (often something we have invested huge personal effort in and feel passionate about) is a defining capability for leaders of change. In change work, we celebrate the leaders who “push through resistance” and “never give up”. We talk less about the leaders who know when to stop – or walk away – from a change initiative altogether. Sometimes that decision is about the work itself: - The initiative is no longer aligned with organisational priorities. - The context has shifted so much that the original case no longer holds. - The effort required now far outweighs any likely benefit. But sometimes, the decision is about the toll on the person leading the change: - Sponsors are absent, inconsistent or obstructive, leaving us carrying the risk but not the authority. - We’re repeatedly asked to “spin” the story or sidestep hard truths in ways that clash with our values. - The behaviours rewarded around the initiative (blame-shifting, pressurising, tolerating poor behaviours) are the opposite of the culture we’re trying to build. Walking away will rarely be applauded. It may look to some people like a lack of resilience or loyalty. Yet it can be an act of deep responsibility: to our own wellbeing, to our credibility, to the people we lead & to the people we are seeking to create better outcomes for. Actions to reduce the risk of having to stop or walk away: 1) Name the conditions we need (sponsorship, resourcing, psychological safety) and pay attention when those conditions are chronically missing. 2) Build regular check‑ins with sponsors to test commitment, reset expectations and surface misalignments early, rather than absorbing them alone. 3) Set the change process up from the start as a series of “experiments” with clear hypotheses and time‑boxes, so we can make decisions about what to do next based on real data, not assumptions. 4) Hold structured learning huddles as a change team, focusing on “What are we learning? What needs to change in our approach? What should we stop?”. 5) Invite voices from outside the core project team (frontline staff, service users, partner organisations) into periodic reflection sessions to test whether the change still makes sense in their reality. 6) Create reflective space with others (coaching, mentoring, peer support) to notice when the work is eroding your own energy, integrity or wellbeing. The first rule of being an effective change agent is that “you can’t be an effective change agent on your own”. As leaders of change, our legacy isn’t just the initiatives we drive to completion. It’s also the ones we have the courage and strategic insight to stop. Sometimes the best move is not to push through, but to step away. See, for instance, @AdmiredLeaders on reactive quitting versus strategic quitting: admiredleadership.com/field-notes/kn…. The graphic is by the brilliant @milanicreative.

English
0
0
0
64
Pamela Russell retweetledi
South Eastern Trust
South Eastern Trust@setrust·
Jake Reilly downloaded the My Care app the minute he heard about it and hasn’t looked back 🤳 “I can see everything from my Consultant and nursing team, anytime. I feel more in control of my health. You’d be foolish not to have it.” 📲 Download today bit.ly/4iF5k8n
English
0
1
4
923
Pamela Russell retweetledi
South Eastern Trust
South Eastern Trust@setrust·
Did you know you can now self-refer for Physiotherapy services directly on the My Care App? A simpler, faster way to get the care you need, putting you in control of your healthcare 💙📱 Download it today 🔗 bit.ly/4iF5k8n
English
0
2
4
671
Pamela Russell
Pamela Russell@pamrustweet·
Leading change: Coveys circles of Control/Influence/Concern ✅No.3 response: Treat influence as real work in complex situations-build relationships and collaborate across depts/organisation rather than trying to solve system constraints inside 1 team
Helen Bevan@HelenBevan

Reflecting on Stephen Covey’s “circle” model: part two. In this post, I am summarising the comments that others made on my last post about Covey’s “circles” model in leading change. The comments come from across multiple social platforms. Thanks to everyone who commented. The comments added useful reality checks. First, the "circles" model can calm the noise. John-Paul Crofton-Biwer said focusing on what we can’t control leaves us governed by fear, while focusing on what we can do builds confidence & that fear or confidence can ripple out & affect others. Cathryn Sloan described how sustained change can create helplessness & loss of agency: the model helps people see where they do have agency, where they need strategies to influence & where they can let go of mental load. Julie Neethling added a mindfulness angle: don’t let “limited thinking” take over; come back to being present; put your own actions & behaviours first - alongside boundaries, checking in on your team, & listening. Conclusion: reduce the drain from “trying harder” at problems that need a different route, while staying grounded enough to take the next practical step. Second, influence isn’t a "soft" option. Claire Doody noted that in matrix organisations, we are often responsible for things we can’t control & sorting helps with the tension between accountability & control. Tina Patel Gunaldo said it’s often within a leader’s control to reach beyond their own department to co-create collaboration. Stephen Sherry added that teams can burn energy compensating for constraints outside their control & misread the lack of movement as a delivery failure. Conclusion: influence is built through relationships & small consistent actions, & it needs time & attention. Third, the model has limits if it becomes too individual. Matt Walsh challenged what happens when we don’t trust the people who have control or influence over the things causing concern, & argued the model can deny collective action. Owen Jarvis warned about over-claiming system change by one organisation & suggested “collective impact,” where roles add up. Sarah Miller argued long-term change comes from redesigning the conditions people operate inside, not only managing attention within them. Conclusion: “focus on what you control” is not a substitute for organising, aligning, & escalating together when the issue sits at system level. Fourth, it’s easy to overestimate our influence. Victoria Hewitt noted we can think we’re in the circle of influence when we “aren’t even on someone else’s diagram at all,” linking this to Covey's Habit 5: “Seek First to Understand then to be Understood.” Conclusion: to influence, understand other people’s pressures, priorities, & trade-offs before pushing your solution. Overall conclusions: Do what we can do in our circle of control; invest in relationships that broaden our circle of influence; name what's bigger in our circle of concern so it can be escalated through other routes. The circles can’t remove constraints, but can help reduce unproductive mental load & direct effort where it can generate impact.

English
0
0
1
122
Pamela Russell retweetledi
NIPEC
NIPEC@NIPEC_online·
Still time to apply. Professional Officer Nurse/Midwife Band 7 NI Practice and Education Council for Nursing and Midwifery. A Waiting List will be created with 2x Permanent posts available immediately jobs.hscni.net/Job/45110/nipe…
NIPEC tweet media
English
0
6
13
575
Pamela Russell retweetledi
South Eastern Trust
South Eastern Trust@setrust·
The Regional Neuro Muscular Clinic at Thompson House Hospital provides a fantastic, specialist service, supporting people across NI living with rare neuromuscular conditions💙 Watch how our brilliant team helps so many patients by delivering superb rehabilitation & care ✨
English
0
2
5
782