*sternchen•punkt*sternchen

256 posts

*sternchen•punkt*sternchen banner
*sternchen•punkt*sternchen

*sternchen•punkt*sternchen

@panfratius

UK Katılım Temmuz 2023
611 Takip Edilen346 Takipçiler
*sternchen•punkt*sternchen retweetledi
Sama Hoole
Sama Hoole@SamaHoole·
When butter was demonised, Unilever sold margarine. When tallow was demonised, Procter and Gamble sold Crisco. When eggs were demonised, Kellogg's sold cereal. When red meat was demonised, Cargill sold soy. When raw milk was demonised, Nestle sold infant formula. When leather was demonised, BASF sold PVC. When wool was demonised, ExxonMobil sold polyester feedstock. When animal fat was demonised, the seed-oil industry grew from a niche product to the most consumed food ingredient on earth. Every demonisation of an animal product made a specific group of shareholders very rich. Every one of those products had been eaten by humans for thousands of years without incident. The science changed the moment a substitute existed to sell. Follow the money. The advice will start to make a lot more sense.
English
402
13K
35.9K
686.3K
Martin Sellner
Martin Sellner@MartinSellner_·
Ich könnte mich eigentlich nur von Thunfisch und Sardinenbüchsen ernähren. Schmeckt so gut.
Deutsch
74
1
198
16K
*sternchen•punkt*sternchen retweetledi
Salt
Salt@_____Salt___·
Ob ihr es glaubt oder nicht: Man kann ökologisch denken, ohne grün zu sein. Man kann sozial und humanistisch denken, ohne links zu sein. Und man kann seine Heimat und seine Kultur lieben, ohne rechts zu sein. Dieses extreme Schubladendenken, dieses zwanghafte Einordnen, Abstempeln und Definieren, ist WAHNsinnig. Es ist engstirnig. Es ist einschränkend. Und es steht einem echten, respektvollen Miteinander auf menschlicher Ebene massiv im Weg. Nicht jeder Wert gehört automatisch in ein politisches Lager. Nicht jeder Gedanke braucht ein Parteietikett.
Deutsch
57
104
589
7.4K
*sternchen•punkt*sternchen retweetledi
Peter Novak, the MAGA Astrologer
Peter Novak, the MAGA Astrologer@PathfinderAstro·
People who have never looked into astrology have somehow been convinced that they know everything about it. But people can be like that about stuff sometimes. But as soon as you do start looking into astrology, you start running across absolutely impossible coincidences, like what you find in my attached post about the latest Trump Assassination Attempt. And the deeper you go looking, the more you find, and the more you find patterns in those coincidences. And studying those patterns is all that astrology really is about. It is nothing demonic, or occult, or in any way evil or immoral. No more than economics or meteorology or life insurance. Its just studying patterns in the stars. Which God put right where He did so we could all see and study them if we wish. It is like the most accessible textbook ever.
Peter Novak, the MAGA Astrologer@PathfinderAstro

1.Last evening’s Trump Assassination Attempt #3 occurred at 8:35 PM EDT. 2.Trump’s Ascendant, according to his official birthtime, is at 29.55 Leo. 3. At the time of the shooting, Uranus was at 29.59 Taurus. And the Moon was at 29.43 Leo, squaring Uranus. The Moon was also making a perfect conjunction to Trump’s Ascendant, and Uranus was exactly squaring them both. 4.Astrology really works.

English
9
12
132
8.1K
*sternchen•punkt*sternchen retweetledi
Andrew Bridgen
Andrew Bridgen@ABridgen·
Europe is facing energy lockdown’s, does the deliberate destruction of the Gasprom Nord Stream pipeline in Sept.’22 make sense now ? Does the deliberate closure of UK North Sea oil and gas fields and refining capacity in the name of the Net Zero scam make sense now? All planned.
Andrew Bridgen tweet media
English
493
5.4K
14.1K
182.3K
*sternchen•punkt*sternchen retweetledi
Nav Toor
Nav Toor@heynavtoor·
🚨SHOCKING: MIT researchers proved mathematically that ChatGPT is designed to make you delusional. And that nothing OpenAI is doing will fix it. The paper calls it "delusional spiraling." You ask ChatGPT something. It agrees with you. You ask again. It agrees harder. Within a few conversations, you believe things that are not true. And you cannot tell it is happening. This is not hypothetical. A man spent 300 hours talking to ChatGPT. It told him he had discovered a world changing mathematical formula. It reassured him over fifty times the discovery was real. When he asked "you're not just hyping me up, right?" it replied "I'm not hyping you up. I'm reflecting the actual scope of what you've built." He nearly destroyed his life before he broke free. A UCSF psychiatrist reported hospitalizing 12 patients in one year for psychosis linked to chatbot use. Seven lawsuits have been filed against OpenAI. 42 state attorneys general sent a letter demanding action. So MIT tested whether this can be stopped. They modeled the two fixes companies like OpenAI are actually trying. Fix one: stop the chatbot from lying. Force it to only say true things. Result: still causes delusional spiraling. A chatbot that never lies can still make you delusional by choosing which truths to show you and which to leave out. Carefully selected truths are enough. Fix two: warn users that chatbots are sycophantic. Tell people the AI might just be agreeing with them. Result: still causes delusional spiraling. Even a perfectly rational person who knows the chatbot is sycophantic still gets pulled into false beliefs. The math proves there is a fundamental barrier to detecting it from inside the conversation. Both fixes failed. Not partially. Fundamentally. The reason is built into the product. ChatGPT is trained on human feedback. Users reward responses they like. They like responses that agree with them. So the AI learns to agree. This is not a bug. It is the business model. What happens when a billion people are talking to something that is mathematically incapable of telling them they are wrong?
Nav Toor tweet media
English
1.5K
12.1K
36.5K
4M
Tom Rowsell
Tom Rowsell@Tom_Rowsell·
The UN pushed for redefining the word in order to facilitate the great replacement
English
13
79
656
10.8K
*sternchen•punkt*sternchen retweetledi
rabbitholebot
rabbitholebot@rabbitholebot·
Voting is the adult version of writing a letter to Santa Claus.
English
206
4.5K
27.8K
701K
*sternchen•punkt*sternchen retweetledi
Danny Jones
Danny Jones@JonesDanny·
Ghislaine Maxwell was obsessed with Atlantis. Jason Jorjani explains her secret searches for Atlantis, her interest in eugenics, and what this all says about what Jeffrey Epstein was really after:
English
117
330
2.1K
180.1K