Parity

@studypatience1 We actually tried our best - shipping two products, and keep working on it. but it's all pnd if we are not have some % at low price - we have to do supply control.

@paritydotcx yeah sure buddy it's a coincidence you relaunched also? can you explain why you abandoned the old coin

@studypatience1 It's binance wallet.

@paritydotcx Do you wanna explain the relaunch? Or explain why your launching fakes with the same funding?

skills are ready to plug into your agent and the playground needs no setup to get started.

the flywheel isn't complicated. devs add parity skills to their agents. agents make skill calls. better usage data makes the context engine sharper. sharper context attracts more devs. it just compounds. no magic to it.

agents write solana programs fine. the problem is they don't know what they don't know. missing signer checks, unvalidated PDAs, unsafe CPI calls. none of it shows up as a compile error. it just ships. that's the gap parity closes.

we don’t want you to think about parity. we want your agent to think with it.

sorry but our agents are basically four steps ahead. while everyone’s still debating whether AI can write secure Solana code, parity agents are already auditing with real exploit context baked in. skill. context. verification. shipping.

good problems to have. lot of ground to cover, know exactly where i’m going.

Your agent wrote the code. parity made sure it survives.

agents write solana programs pretty well now. the problem is they write them the way a competent generalist would. not the way someone who’s read a hundred audit reports would.

@Z3roDoG3 gm mate!

@paritydotcx GM legend!

GM I'm excited because I'm almost ready to show something new. 😎

@toto_fxtrade gm

@paritydotcx GM!

the code looked fine. it was not fine. Verepo knew.

the gap isn't writing solana code. agents are decent at that. the gap is knowing which patterns are dangerous and why. that's what we're building into the context engine.

holding $PRT is a bet on agents. we're just the skills layer

@elonmusk agents are writing code faster than anyone can review it. and nobody's asking if that code is actually safe. truth-seeking is great at the model level. but if the tooling around it has no memory of what "safe Solana code" actually looks like, the agent just ships vulnerabilities with confidence. that's the gap verepo closes. drop a repo, get a score, see exactly what got missed. parity.cx/verepo

Got a question for you all. how many times have you shipped something convinced it was solid, then found the issue later? thinking about this because it’s exactly the problem parity is built around. agents write confident code. confident code still has bugs.

pump.fun (@pumpfun) nearing $1B in revenue. millions of tokens launched. almost none audited. parity exists so agents stop shipping vulnerable code before anyone notices. verepo for instant scoring. security skills for everything else.

ran @Raydium AMM through parity.cx/verepo. 72/100. structure, security, error handling all solid. testing coverage is the only thing dragging it down.