The Hobby Attorney (Parody)

Bottom line after 85 pages: The legal arguments (especially pre-suit notice and anti-SLAPP) are better developed than you’d expect from most pro se filings. The presentation is very much “wonky on the eyes” with all the classic self-drafted quirks. TO BE CONTINUED

A huge chunk of these first 85 pages are exhibits — screenshots of his old Blogger profile, tweets, podcast appearances, and media citations going back to 2008. Repetitive in places, but clearly meant to prove he qualifies as “media” for § 770.01 purposes.

Starting a detailed read-through of Joshua Kusnick’s massive 400+ page pro se omnibus filing in the Perfect Game / Thurman defamation case (2024-CA-010418). Right from page 1 the caption is… well… it’s a little wonky on the eyes. Extremely long repetitive string of rule citations, mismatched margins, and the unmistakable look of a self-drafted document. This is going to be a journey. (pages 1-85)

Parties can dismiss cases for all kinds of strategic reasons. We’ll see what happens next in the Broward litigation — especially with Hartman’s new compulsory counterclaim now on the table.

As always, this is just my quick read of the public court records. Tweets are not legal advice and I’m not an attorney.

Let’s talk about the Miami-Dade County lawsuit: Perfect Game et al. v. Joshua Kusnick (Case No. 2024-010418-CA-01, 11th Judicial Circuit).