Catholic HODL ✝️🇺🇸🇻🇦⚡️

I have a quick favor to ask those who engage with my account. I just realized I'm only 300+ followers away from 10,000. That seems reachable this week. If you're a Catholic and like Catholic content, I'd appreciate a follow. I repost and engage often. If you're a Bitcoin owner and supporter, I'd appreciate a follow. I repost and engage often. Please share for visibility. My gratitude is very real. God's will. I'll also be optimistic and pro-America. All the best to you on X! 📿✝️🙏🇺🇸❤️

🚨 JAPAN TO INVEST UP TO $40B IN U.S. NUCLEAR Japan plans to fund small modular reactors across Tennessee and Alabama through GE Vernova Hitachi Energy. Power is now the biggest bottleneck for data centers, with grid constraints slowing new AI capacity. SMRs could be a key solution as AI demand explodes.

This is insane detail.

Wow! Moon close ups.

If the communion is not the real body of Christ why then the Satanic group need it?

Catholicism is beautiful and true

I have a quick favor to ask those who engage with my account. I just realized I'm only 300+ followers away from 10,000. That seems reachable this week. If you're a Catholic and like Catholic content, I'd appreciate a follow. I repost and engage often. If you're a Bitcoin owner and supporter, I'd appreciate a follow. I repost and engage often. Please share for visibility. My gratitude is very real. God's will. I'll also be optimistic and pro-America. All the best to you on X! 📿✝️🙏🇺🇸❤️

Honored to have traveled further than any spread in history 🚀 Taking spreading smiles to new heights ❤️

@maureenEpid Very much so

@PaxAeterna Oooooo, so you are happy Elon took over

Were you here in Jack's era (twitter). What kept your account in tact?

@maureenEpid Conservatives in America were public enemy #1.

@PaxAeterna Wow!! I never knew there were bans then, I have been maintaining this account since 2013

Artemis II has reached its maximum distance from Earth. On the far side of the Moon, 252,756 miles away, Reid, Victor, Christina, and Jeremy have now traveled farther from Earth than any humans in history and now begin their journey home. Before they left, they said they hoped this mission would be forgotten, but it will be remembered as the moment people started to believe that America can once again do the near-impossible and change the world. Congratulations to this incredible crew and the entire NASA team, our international and commercial partners, but this mission isn’t over until they’re under safe parachutes, splashing down into the Pacific.

BREATHTAKING🚨: WOW! NASA just dropped this view of the moon’s far side!

@johnkonrad Which half of the Catholic Church lol. I know you’re joking 🙃

I don’t know who should control the Strait of Hormuz if Iran falls but I’ve got a very firm list of who absolutely should not be allowed anywhere near it…. UN NGOs China World Bank NATO Marxists Any Nation in Europe except Poland CIA NSA Diplomats Any World Economic Forum member USAID Soros-funded anything Climate people Think tanks NGOS Ivy League graduates Former journalists Current journalists Future journalists Adam Kinzinger Election observers Democracy builders Any Marxist church Half the Catholic Church Any mosque or temples Techbros Technocrats Georgetown grads Navy Admirals MBAs CEOs Conflict-resolution negotiators Cheney family members Russians Ukrainians Palestinians Israelis Human-rights monitors Greta Thurnberg Any Activist Andrew Tate PR agencies Hollywood Neocons Somalia Democrats Globalists Keir Starmer Carbon-credit brokers Academics Influencers Hipsters Boomers IMF And most of all McKinsey consultants

@johnkonrad @dlaw530 I think I can hear @TFL1728 shouting yes yes yes!!!!🙌

What if America is already far richer than anyone in the swamp is allowed to admit? What if the real drag on the Republic isn’t taxes, isn’t debt, isn’t even the deficit, it’s Europe? What if NATO was never a mutual defense pact, but a 75-year subscription America forgot to cancel? What if “burden sharing” is the most expensive euphemism in the English language? What if the City of London cabal is draining our banks? What if the advice from globalists is terrible advice that’s costing us big? What if every European basing agreement, every forward-deployed brigade, every Ramstein runway, every Aviano hangar, every Souda Bay pier is a tax American workers pay so Berlin can run a welfare state and Paris can run a 35-hour week? What if foreign aid to Europe isn’t aid, it’s tribute, flowing the wrong way? What if transporting the vast majority of trade on European owned ships costs more than we realize? What if the NGO archipelago in Brussels, Geneva, and The Hague is just a money-laundering loop where US taxpayer dollars get rinsed through a “civil society” conference and returned as lectures about our democracy? What if the UN isn’t a parliament of man, it’s a Manhattan timeshare with diplomatic plates, an accounting black hole, and a Human Rights Council chaired by people who’d jail you for tweeting this? What if “the rules-based international order” was always code for: Americans build it, Americans pay for it, Americans bleed for it, and Europeans grade it? What if $36 trillion in debt looks a lot smaller the second you stop underwriting a continent that sneers at you in three languages? What if you zeroed out the Europe line, the NATO line, the UN line, the NGO line, and woke up tomorrow in a country with the fiscal headroom to rebuild every shipyard, every foundry, every rail line, and every Navy hull we’ve let rot since the Cold War ended? What if American tourists went to American cathedrals, American opera, American museums, American cities instead. I’m not saying I believe all of it. I’m saying maybe, just maybe, we could pay down all our debt and wouldn’t have to pay taxes at all if we cut Europe loose.

🚨: The 600-mile-wide moon crater seen by humans for the first time, known as Orientale Basin.

Science lesson 101. That’s the problem with relying on “pure logic” detached from reality—it can lead you completely astray. The ancient Greeks, using impeccable logic, concluded that motion was an illusion. They also believed that heavier objects fall faster than lighter ones—both conclusions were wrong. Progress only came when we moved beyond abstract reasoning and started observing nature, gathering data, and asking the right questions. The same applies here. Logic alone is not enough. What matters is observation, empirical evidence, and a correct interpretation of the data. Right now, you’re not really listening to what Bitcoin is showing. You’re trying to impose a preconceived logical framework onto it—and that’s exactly how you miss the signal.

@BitcoinSensei4U @Giovann35084111 @sminston_with @grok Sensei your something may happen to change the model theory doesn’t make sense yet as there’s no data yet. When you have some great. But this reading bear fat cooking in a pan future predicting seems more like astrology

@Giovann35084111 @PaxAeterna @sminston_with @grok You are just repeating yourself, but you are completely missing the point I'm making.

Something very interesting about Rudd and Porter's peer-reviewed paper on Bitcoin's price forecast: they don't show their price models superimposed on Bitcoin's price history. Here is exactly that - and probably why they didn't want to show it in the paper. 👇 Orange = median PL regression model Orange band = 5th-95th percentile PL regression Green, grey, red, blue = Rudd/Porter's Fig. 11 models - - - On its face, visually and qualitatively, it looks improbable at best. Quantitatively and intuitively, it falls far outside the bounds of the value growth expected of Bitcoin as a network with specific scaling properties. Select quote from the paper: "Power law models that statistically describe Bitcoin’s historical price growth [...] are descriptive, not predictive, in that they provide no insights regarding the direct impact of particular determinants on market price." Meanwhile, this paper has predicted NOTHING, and I and others have shown out-of-sample PREDICTIONS of Bitcoin's price using the power law as far back as early 2016/late 2015. Stay tuned for my own comprehensive peer-review of this work. -Smitty

@BitcoinSensei4U @PaxAeterna @sminston_with @grok And by the way conceptual thinking is foundation to empirical science. But we don't rely only on "thinking" but on data and observation that you are refusing to do.