phil beisel

We could try: When the model processes the tokens of a biology question written in Italian, the router selects sequences of top-k experts for each token. The particular pattern of experts that get activated across those tokens correlates strongly with handling Italian-language scientific content. No individual expert is dedicated to Italian or to biology, the experts are more like general computational primitives, and their combined, sparse activation pattern across the prompt is what effectively handles that kind of query

@Rafa_Schwinger It’s a generic explanation. You are not being rude. I think my explanation goes a long way making sense of a complex topic. The technical explanation is lost on many.

Grok 4.5 is remarkably fast, and there are several reasons why. The biggest is its efficient Mixture of Experts (MoE) architecture. Unlike a monolithic model, an MoE model routes each prompt only to the expert modules most relevant to the task. If you ask a biology question in Italian, for example, the biology and Italian experts are activated while the rest of the model remains idle. That reduces the amount of computation required for every query. Speed also comes from the execution pipeline itself. Data flows through the system with highly optimized, close-to-the-hardware efficiency, minimizing overhead at every stage. That relentless focus on efficiency pays off. Lower latency makes conversations feel more natural, more interactive, and ultimately creates a significantly better user experience.

@mikepat711 Build is life.

Build is life

@Scobleizer All things that move will move autonomously (except the 'living' variety of course).

My robot is driving me to a robot company in San Francisco. Life is good! Hope you have a great weekend. One thing about having a robot to drive you: you will drive more. I wouldn’t drive the three hour round trip from my house in San Jose nearly as often if I had to manually drive. So as more people get robots to drive them traffic will get worse. Which is why Elon is digging tunnels. All technologies have pros and cons. I like hanging out with the people who see the pros.

$SPCX

@dr__dwayne Ok you short it

@pbeisel The business of space is a money pit. There won't be a way to generate significant $$ to justify trillions in market cap. The stock has a long way to fall yet.

$SPCX Yesterday SpaceX aborted a launch of Starship v13 due to an engine failure (4 engines failed to start). The abort process worked as planned (something that is hard to test). The rocket did not blow up and it stayed anchored to the pad. It was almost boring. This will not be the last abort. The stock will likely trade down. If this launch abort spooked you, please sell. SpaceX is not for you. The business of space is hard. There are many failures on the path to success. All very public and visible. To understand how SpaceX got to Falcon 9, a highly reusable platform, you have to understand failure. Today I buy.

@Avatrode @GaryMarcus Correct

@GaryMarcus All of us already know Elon's not magic. He's the product of his own hard work, ingenuity, and intelligence. But now we found out Gary who wrote the post, is a moron.

SpaceX is likely going to crash hard Friday, as people come to realize that Elon isn’t magic.

@WR4NYGov I said my piece, but I like how you put it.

“Elon isn’t magic” Gary Marcus couldn’t launch a payload if Sydney Sweeney begged him for it.

@GaryMarcus Elon might not be a magician, but you certainly aren't a man.

@Scobleizer 🎯

My dad worked for Lockheed Missiles and Space company for more than three decades. Helped with the material science on the shuttle’s tiles, and the radiation shielding for its military satellites. If he were alive we would be talking about how incredible it is that a rocket can fire some of its engines. Fail. And shut down without blowing up.

Imagine the mind of a person that feels the need to post something like this. This isn't the quite the flex he thinks it is. Its a small man showing his contempt and jealously. We see right through him. Whoever he is.

@mitchdeg Never will understand losers like this guy. Imagine feeling the need to say this because of a fucking aborted launch attempt.

'Elon isn't magic'. Well, sorry, he definitely is [magic] by many measures. Just look, understand and respect all he has created. Yet another little jealous and frustrated guy..."

@jensonchou007 Let them, need to flush out the weak hands.

@pbeisel Before IPO launches, nobody bats an eye. After IPO, Everybody loses their minds.

@JCBForumSpeak @SpaceX Ridiculous “analysis”

@SpaceX I don't see how SpaceX can ever get the rocket reliable enough.... It's gonna be a decade+ at this rate?

Standing down from today’s flight test attempt

@SkellyIT @SeaGirtNJ @Starlink I might try once its feature complete on iPhone.

@pbeisel @SeaGirtNJ @Starlink You going to bring the NetP app to Android?

Starlink goes to the beach. @SeaGirtNJ AT&T 5G not so great. Starlink mini @Starlink awesome. Data compare via my NetP app, link below.

@charleschengolf @SeaGirtNJ No doubt clear sky is a winning formula here. And I assume the cell tower is not too close.

@pbeisel @SeaGirtNJ On the beach, the space wins!

@sophaller Starmind.

so how do we save our farm land and stop all these dumb data centers?