Commie dog

1.4K posts

Commie dog banner
Commie dog

Commie dog

@perretecommie

Katılım Ocak 2026
55 Takip Edilen13 Takipçiler
Commie dog
Commie dog@perretecommie·
@liberaster57149 @FranNunesEcon Being honest about the subjective and moral nature of one's speculative claims —instead of fatuously trying to pass them as "science"— makes them far superior, yes. This is fairly obvious.
English
0
0
0
4
Loremaster Liberaster
Loremaster Liberaster@liberaster57149·
@perretecommie @FranNunesEcon When you throw away the papers it really becomes easy to write speculative essays and use dialectics to make normative claims. This is far superior to the scientific method because you can't present any empirical evidence to a third party observer
English
1
0
0
7
El Club De JR
El Club De JR@ClubRallo·
@perretecommie @LaikaOrbital @FranNunesEcon @edugaresp Trump patalea con aranceles, pero sigue sin ser bloqueo. Si realmente lo fuera, tendrían barcos,aviones,etc dispuestos a reventar cualquier medio de transporte que vaya con el objetivo de comerciar con Cuba. Acéptalo, Cuba se muere de hambre porque gobiernan tiranos.
Español
1
0
0
17
Loremaster Liberaster
Loremaster Liberaster@liberaster57149·
@perretecommie @FranNunesEcon The actual method has value, and the model never build a true claim of rea world context, it's not the purpose. Also a lot for studies are flawed, this just means you can build one them in the future. A bad study would not get published in this type of journal
English
1
0
0
11
El Club De JR
El Club De JR@ClubRallo·
@perretecommie @LaikaOrbital @FranNunesEcon @edugaresp Sigues haciendo el ridículo. Un artículo de un periódico es una opinión, igual que la tienes tú. Por eso yo me baso en definiciones. En ningún momento se ha prohibido a México comerciar con Cuba. Lo único que ha hecho Trump (como de costumbre) es amenazar con aranceles.
Español
1
0
0
12
Commie dog
Commie dog@perretecommie·
@liberaster57149 @FranNunesEcon Peer review doesn't automatically guarantee the truth of a claim or the real-world context behind the math. A study can be fundamentally flawed but still get published just because the raw data is valuable.
English
1
0
0
8
Loremaster Liberaster
Loremaster Liberaster@liberaster57149·
@perretecommie @FranNunesEcon It doesn't have to be complicated, but it requires that you understand that there are academic standards in these journals and they wouldn't publish garbage. It's a strictly peer reviewed journal. There is nothing elitist about how academia works, it like that in every field
English
1
0
0
9
Commie dog
Commie dog@perretecommie·
@NotMagaior @criticofpolecon Your critique of astrology is exactly the evidence you need that the methods being used in that paper are questionable.
English
1
0
0
18
Calm down son listen
Calm down son listen@NotMagaior·
@perretecommie @criticofpolecon There you go what? What do you mean to say? I know that people who don't understand the ECP think that people are capable of reading minds, but that's not really the case. State your argument.
English
1
0
0
19
Loremaster Liberaster
Loremaster Liberaster@liberaster57149·
@perretecommie @FranNunesEcon How are you the source of knowledge on this? Are you qualified to be published in a journal of developmental economics? Have you published or completed any research on econometrics?
English
1
0
0
16
Commie dog
Commie dog@perretecommie·
@liberaster57149 @FranNunesEcon You can dress this ideological fanfiction up as math all you want, but building 30-year "what-if" projections on a contaminated donor pool isn't serious econometrics.
English
1
0
0
18
Loremaster Liberaster
Loremaster Liberaster@liberaster57149·
@perretecommie @FranNunesEcon It's ironic the level of intellectual dishonesty you are showing regarding a publication. How does economic populism fry somebody's brain so much? You remind me of Sharikov in Bulgakov's "Heart of a Dog" novella, his character is literally a satire of this behavior
English
1
0
0
19
Mat Nuclear
Mat Nuclear@MatNuclear·
I am calling out @mehdirhasan to a debate, you quote tweeted me, let's do it. You can get the "Greenwald treatment."
English
432
293
3K
351.5K
Commie dog
Commie dog@perretecommie·
@liberaster57149 @FranNunesEcon Yeah, that's exactly what fortune tellers say when you question the horoscope. This might be at the top of your cognitive abilities, but it's not exactly rocket science, buddy.
English
1
0
0
26
Commie dog
Commie dog@perretecommie·
@alandete Lo que es bochornoso es que un corresponsal en EEUU no haya encontrado el momento de contarle a sus lectores que Trump ha choriceado 1800 millones de dinero público en la última semana… Eres una vergüenza, Alandete.
Español
0
0
0
2
David Alandete
David Alandete@alandete·
Qué escándalo, qué bochorno, qué forma de hundirse y hundir lo que se tiene alrededor, ojalá los profesionales que hay en RTVE reaccionen porque esto está haciendo mucho, mucho, mucho daño y muy, muy, muy duradero.
JaviZone 🚀@JavierSanz

🚨 Javier Ruiz, intenta desprestigiar a la Policía porque en su informe aseguran que se pagaron 10.000€ de mordida. Según el presentador “se asume que 10K no es una carrera de 10 kilómetros” Es insoportable el nivel de manipulación

Español
410
3.8K
10.2K
177.4K
El Club De JR
El Club De JR@ClubRallo·
@perretecommie @LaikaOrbital @FranNunesEcon @edugaresp Que puedes ladrar lo que quieras, pero la realidad es que todos los países pueden hacer negocios con Cuba. Igual podrías empezar a echar algo de culpa al gobierno totalitario y socialista que hay, pero oye, no quiero que cortocircuites.
Español
1
0
0
24