peter_marklund

1.4K posts

peter_marklund

peter_marklund

@peter_marklund

Full Stack Web Developer - Node.js, Python, Clojure, Elixir, Ruby

Stockholm Katılım Ağustos 2008
651 Takip Edilen345 Takipçiler
peter_marklund
peter_marklund@peter_marklund·
@gudmundson_per In a sense music has been democratized though since now everybody can make music on their laptop and release it to Spotify with the click of a button and it won’t cost you almost anything and you will have professional music technology. Just don’t expect to make any money from it
English
0
0
0
17
peter_marklund
peter_marklund@peter_marklund·
Useful overlooked JavaScript console functions for debuggning - table, assert, trace, time, timeEnd @me4saurabh4u/agethe-console-log-trick-that-senior-developers-dont-want-you-to-know-af66d61eda99" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">medium.com/@me4saurabh4u/…
English
0
0
1
24
peter_marklund
peter_marklund@peter_marklund·
I just open sourced a little command line tool called json that I use as a complement to jq for working with JSON data in the terminal github.com/peter/json
English
1
0
0
28
peter_marklund retweetledi
Financial Physics
Financial Physics@FinancialPhys·
The job market
English
169
3.2K
30.1K
1.1M
peter_marklund retweetledi
DHH
DHH@dhh·
Microservices is the software industry’s most successful confidence scam. It convinces small teams that they are “thinking big” while systematically destroying their ability to move at all. It flatters ambition by weaponizing insecurity: if you’re not running a constellation of services, are you even a real company? Never mind that this architecture was invented to cope with organizational dysfunction at planetary scale. Now it’s being prescribed to teams that still share a Slack channel and a lunch table. Small teams run on shared context. That is their superpower. Everyone can reason end-to-end. Everyone can change anything. Microservices vaporize that advantage on contact. They replace shared understanding with distributed ignorance. No one owns the whole anymore. Everyone owns a shard. The system becomes something that merely happens to the team, rather than something the team actively understands. This isn’t sophistication. It’s abdication. Then comes the operational farce. Each service demands its own pipeline, secrets, alerts, metrics, dashboards, permissions, backups, and rituals of appeasement. You don’t “deploy” anymore—you synchronize a fleet. One bug now requires a multi-service autopsy. A feature release becomes a coordination exercise across artificial borders you invented for no reason. You didn’t simplify your system. You shattered it and called the debris “architecture.” Microservices also lock incompetence in amber. You are forced to define APIs before you understand your own business. Guesses become contracts. Bad ideas become permanent dependencies. Every early mistake metastasizes through the network. In a monolith, wrong thinking is corrected with a refactor. In microservices, wrong thinking becomes infrastructure. You don’t just regret it—you host it, version it, and monitor it. The claim that monoliths don’t scale is one of the dumbest lies in modern engineering folklore. What doesn’t scale is chaos. What doesn’t scale is process cosplay. What doesn’t scale is pretending you’re Netflix while shipping a glorified CRUD app. Monoliths scale just fine when teams have discipline, tests, and restraint. But restraint isn’t fashionable, and boring doesn’t make conference talks. Microservices for small teams is not a technical mistake—it is a philosophical failure. It announces, loudly, that the team does not trust itself to understand its own system. It replaces accountability with protocol and momentum with middleware. You don’t get “future proofing.” You get permanent drag. And by the time you finally earn the scale that might justify this circus, your speed, your clarity, and your product instincts will already be gone.
English
181
1.2K
8.3K
992.6K
peter_marklund retweetledi
Etornam ✨
Etornam ✨@_iamEtornam·
“Just write code like a normal human f*cking being, please”
English
75
840
10K
788.2K