andrew pfeifer retweetledi
andrew pfeifer
499 posts

andrew pfeifer retweetledi

@WhiteHouse @SeanParnellUSA Unless you’re attacking the Capitol in Donald Trump’s name.
In that case, we’ll pardon you and make you a millionaire.

English

@BskiMike22802 @Teri5109642952 @RepJeffries And you think Trump is the best we have? He's the worst spokesman for anything ever.
English

@Teri5109642952 @RepJeffries I am glad to do so. This guy really is the spokesperson of the Dems, the best they have.
English

@liberty_lady1 @SherannGlorfie2 @DemocraticWins Keep drinking that Kool aid.. You're probably waiting on that gold phone huh? I heard there is a model 2 coming out you better get your check book ready. Idiot
English

@SherannGlorfie2 @DemocraticWins WTH? Name a LIE? find one? Dumbas3 RETARD!
English

@Patrickwebb Another thought of a plan like his health care plan
English

@RichardTrickle_ @DemocraticWins So let's build a billion dollar ball room that sounds like $ well spent. Runs the country like his failed casinos.
English

@DemocraticWins Socialism always works until you run out of other people's money.
English

The fact that Republicans won't support efforts like this should tell you everything you need to know about which party is going to win America's future.
Democrats Deliver@DemzDeliver
🚨NEW: James Talarico introduces plan for nationwide paid family leave.
English
andrew pfeifer retweetledi
andrew pfeifer retweetledi

“If you can convince the lowest white man he's better than the best colored man, he won't notice you're picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he'll empty his pockets for you". Wise words that still ring true today spoken by an upstanding Texan, LBJ in 1964… let it sink in that it’s now 2026.
English
andrew pfeifer retweetledi

@earl_brann46126 @jynx7081 @DemocraticWins And this is what you were saying when Biden was pres also right?
English

@jynx7081 @pfeiferandrew @DemocraticWins We are a great country
Stop whining and survive the short term
Things are going to get better
English

@earl_brann46126 @DemocraticWins Who cares. You guys need a new talking point, stop living in the past. The future looks pretty bleak at this point. So you are ok with gas prices right? As long as it is under Trump and not Biden? Hypocrites
English

@DemocraticWins You Dems are such drama bitches
I don’t recall your anger over auto-pens $5 gas
English

@taStewart @ABC Maybe they don't want their child's photos everywhere. Sounds to me like they are being good parents trying to give their children a normal life. Geez you suck as a person
English

@ABC Who cares. No one has connection with this child … and that is the fault of his parents. We’ve all been in the dark for years about his appearance. Harry and Megan can be compared to Michael Jackson who use to hide his children’s faces behind scarves and masks.
English

Prince Archie, the eldest child of Prince Harry and Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex, is celebrating his 7th birthday.
Read more: abcnews.link/Dimo0PB
English
andrew pfeifer retweetledi
andrew pfeifer retweetledi

@OscarPr43285701 @Wwolfhunt @DemocraticWins @usamattersmedia Who cares. He's not president. You act like both sides aren't hypocritical. Stop caring about the past
English
andrew pfeifer retweetledi

@DemocraticWins @usamattersmedia And the worst part is, no one is surprised!
Trump is a failed businessman, a charlatan, a rapist, a pedophile, and a low IQ guy


English
andrew pfeifer retweetledi

@Patrickwebb Pete Hegseth is about to have a whole lot of beer to himself in the coming days.

English
andrew pfeifer retweetledi

@Patrickwebb @Deb041866 Saw this one coming. Deservedly! Another red X!! Hegseth… start the clock asshole! Yer next!

English

@real_defender @DemocraticWins When will R stop saying Biden. Who cares. You have control of the house, the Senate and prez.. come on get some shit done
English

@DemocraticWins So why didn’t democrats do this when Biden was president and gas prices were much higher than they are now?
English

@TRONCAFE365 @justinsuntron You my friend have also been screwed and conned by the biggest con man the USA has ever seen. Sorry
English

@justinsuntron I sincerely support Tron and WLFI. Please respect each other, overcome difficulties, and make a big leap forward.

English

This Is World Tyranny, Not World Liberty Financial — Here's Why
This proposal has been packaged as a "governance alignment signal" and a "long-term commitment," but strip away the packaging and what you have is one of the most absurd governance scams I have ever seen. Let me break it down.
I. Vote Against and Get Punished — Classic Coercion Tactic
This is not a legitimate voting exercise, not even close. The design of this proposal is a logical trap: anyone who votes against it has their tokens locked indefinitely with no unlock path whatsoever.
In other words, if you oppose this proposal, you get punished. This is not voting. This is coercion. What kind of democratic process rewards agreement and imprisons dissent?
II. Voters Have Been Selectively Frozen Out
I personally hold approximately 4% of the voting power, yet my tokens have been frozen and I am forced out of this voting process.
I am not alone.
A large number of holders with significant voting rights are in the same position. Meanwhile, the team controls the power to freeze tokens — they decide who can vote and who cannot. What does this mean? It means the outcome was determined before the vote even began.
This is not a governance vote. This is a performance where the police have already barricaded the doors of parliament and only let their own people inside to raise their hands. The voter pool has been purged. Only yes votes remain.
The result of such a vote carries no binding force whatsoever.
III. All Actual Power Has Been Seized by Anonymous Actors
The actual control over the WLFI smart contracts lies in the hands of a 3/5 anonymous multisig and a single anonymous guardian EOA has the power to blacklist addresses holding WLFI.
Let me emphasize — anonymous.
This anonymous multisig can override any vote result and execute any operation directly at the contract level. The so-called governance proposals, on-chain votes, and community discussions are nothing but theater. Real power has never been yielded to anyone but themselves and it’s laughable that they try these tricks to fool the community.
The bottom line is this, the power sits with anonymous wallet addresses whose owners nobody knows or can verify. This is not decentralized governance. This is dictatorship wearing the mask of a DAO.
IV. Voters Must Identify Themselves, but the Rulers Are Anonymous — Worse Than Tyranny
Here is the most ironic part: WLFI requires every participating voter to complete identity verification, electronically sign acknowledgements, and meet compliance eligibility requirements. You want to exercise your rights? Show your face first.
But who are the guardian and multisig signers who hold the power of life and death over the contract? Nobody was told and there is absolutely no transparency. While the governed must identify themselves, the governors with absolute power are anonymous. Your voters must register, submit to scrutiny, and be vetted and dictated how to vote— while your dictators won't even show their faces.
V. A Naked Violation of Property Rights Worth Billions of Dollars
Let us not forget the real stakes of this proposal: this is not some trivial parameter adjustment or protocol upgrade. This vote seeks to decide the unlock schedule for billions of dollars in assets, the reallocation of governance and vesting rights, and most extreme of all, the permanent destruction of billions of tokens. This is a naked expropriation of holders' property rights.
In an environment where voting against the proposal is punished, where large numbers of holders have been frozen out of voting, and where actual control rests with anonymous wallets, using this sham vote to decide the fate of billions of dollars in assets?
This is not governance. This is a sham and flies in the face of what this protocol was meant to be. No society governed by the rule of law would permit this. In traditional financial markets, any asset disposition of this scale would require rigorous regulatory review, independent board approval, and minority shareholder protections.
Here, a few anonymous wallets get to decide everything. The permanent burning of tokens means holders' property is irreversibly destroyed, no compensation, no recourse, no due process. This has gone far beyond the realm of so-called "decentralized governance." This is a systematic violation of property rights.
Conclusion
I repeat that this proposal is not governance. It is an exercise of power by the selected few who are carefully engineering a further power consolidation and property expropriation operation.
Dissenters are punished for voting no. Opponents are frozen out. Actual control lies with anonymous wallets. Those who exercise their rights must prove their identity while the fate of billions of dollars in assets is decided by a sham vote.
This is not what decentralized finance was meant to be, results produced under these sorts of conditions carry no legitimacy, should not have binding force, and should not be recognized.
I call on all WLFI holders to see this proposal for what it truly is, to voice their opposition across all public channels, and to reserve all legal rights of recourse.
WLFI@worldlibertyfi
We’ve just posted a governance proposal to the forum for community discussion, and we believe it represents one of the strongest long-term governance alignment signals in DeFi. Here's what it does 🧵
English









