Paul Freire ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ

2.2K posts

Paul Freire ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ banner
Paul Freire ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ

Paul Freire ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ

@pfreire99

Sports

Kelowna, BC Katฤฑlฤฑm Ocak 2012
313 Takip Edilen130 Takipรงiler
Paul Freire ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ
@aftncanada Sad to say but I canโ€™t see a future in Vancouver for the Whitecaps. Ownership seem desperate to sell. Attendance is good. Not sure what else the fans can do. Feel like the asking price is just way too high. Iโ€™m not even sure a new stadium is enough at this point. Sad days.
English
1
0
3
175
Paul Freire ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ
@UsmcBobLeeSwag As a Zag fan this one really feels like itโ€™s been 50/50 for weeks. Heโ€™s visited both. Still 50/50. Feels like usually thereโ€™s a tell or something. This time nothing. Just feels like it could go either way. Really either choice is pretty solid. Either Few or Pitino coaching.
English
1
0
1
227
BobLeeSwagger!
BobLeeSwagger!@UsmcBobLeeSwagยท
How good do we feel being 50-50 on Diop? ๐Ÿค” #sjubb
English
14
0
23
7.5K
Tim Gibson
Tim Gibson@Timmy_G_Erieยท
Why should it not have been ruled a goal on the ice - Do you have proof that the ref didn't have a clear angle on the puck? Seems to me that only people with an IQ south of 80 are arguing that it wasn't a goal, he clearly made the correct call. The REAL disaster would be if they called it a no goal and everyone saw video of a CLEAR goal and the game went on. I hate the ducks and don't want them to win this series, but Jesus christ stop being retarded and stubborn. At this point you MUST know you're wrong... you MUST have basic deductive reasoning..... you MUST be have a basic sense of self awareness?
English
2
0
1
36
ESPN
ESPN@espnยท
THE DUCKS BEAT THE OILERS IN OVERTIME ๐Ÿ”ฅ The reigning back-to-back western conference champions are now facing elimination ๐Ÿ‘€
English
139
344
3.2K
333K
Emir
Emir@zayn792ยท
@pfreire99 @Timmy_G_Erie @03vette88 @espn I didnโ€™t miss it. Iโ€™ll always side on, make the correct call, even if youโ€™re late. Thatโ€™s a goal and it would have been way worse if we saw the reply & game continued & oilers won. It was clearly over the line and the correct team won. Have a good one
English
1
0
1
55
Paul Freire ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ retweetledi
Ryan Whitney
Ryan Whitney@ryanwhitney6ยท
So these two guys got together and said what? โ€œYou see anything?โ€ โ€œNope did you see anythingโ€ โ€œNope i couldnโ€™t see shitโ€ โ€œMe neither. So no goal?โ€ โ€œWell the crowd is going nuts and Ryan Poehling said it was in so i think we say itโ€™s a goalโ€ โ€œYeah good idea. Thatโ€™s a goalโ€
World Hockey Report@worldhockeyrpt

Thereโ€™s no way these refs could have seen the puck cross the goal lineโ€ฆโ€ฆ..

English
258
219
2.8K
416.4K
Paul Freire ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ
@zayn792 @Timmy_G_Erie @03vette88 @espn And youโ€™re missing the point that the ref never called it a goal on the play, consulted with 3 other refs who were no where near the play and THEN called it a goal?!?! And then said it was clearly over the line? Weโ€™ll forever disagree on this. Enjoy the playoffs
English
2
0
0
23
Emir
Emir@zayn792ยท
@pfreire99 @Timmy_G_Erie @03vette88 @espn Youre still under the assumption that what youโ€™re saying is correct. Itโ€™s not. Iโ€™ll say it again, geometry. Just becuase a skate covers it, doesnโ€™t mean we canโ€™t see clearly using our brains and math, that itโ€™s a goal. Thatโ€™s what youโ€™re missing and continue to miss
English
1
0
1
27
Paul Freire ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ
@Timmy_G_Erie @zayn792 @03vette88 @espn ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚ you do you bud. That never should have been called a goal on the ice. Then never should have been followed up by the ref saying it was completely over the line, with no actual evidence to prove it. But whatever, I guess your 6 figure salary in hockey proves it was in?
English
1
0
0
83
Tim Gibson
Tim Gibson@Timmy_G_Erieยท
@pfreire99 @zayn792 @03vette88 @espn There's not, you dumb fuck, that's called reflective lighting or the "Albedo effect" You're out of your depth here you dolt, save yourself from further embarrassment
English
1
0
1
28
Paul Freire ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ
@zayn792 @Timmy_G_Erie @03vette88 @espn My initial tweet was correct. I still have not seen a single picture that SHOWS white between the puck and goal line. Was it in? Probably. Can you call a goal a goal because it probably crossed the line. No. So how was that called a goal?
English
2
0
0
34
CamDiccer
CamDiccer@LightningPulse_ยท
@ryanwhitney6 Called a goal on the ice so there needs to be conclusive evidence to overturn it. Learn basic hockey buddy.
English
9
0
10
2K
Paul Freire ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ
@otterownsyou @ryanwhitney6 GEOGRAPHY ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚
English
0
0
1
244
Jake Oettinger
Jake Oettinger@otterownsyouยท
@ryanwhitney6 Whit, it does not take a genius to understand the geography here. You donโ€™t see the full puck, we understand. But draw a full fucking line through Jarryโ€™s skate along the goal line and you can use context clues. Good goal, would be a disgrace for them to rule otherwise
English
9
2
47
4K
๐Ÿ’ ๐Ÿ’ ๐Ÿ’
@pfreire99 @espn Call on the ice was a good goal. If youโ€™ve got clear, conclusive proof it didnโ€™t cross, letโ€™s see it. With that Canadian flag in your name, youโ€™d think youโ€™d know the shape and size of a puck.
English
3
0
5
97