Rasmus Corlin Christensen (ghost account)

🚨 New paper out! Excited to share this, where I take a 'weaponized interdependence' view at explaining historical failure and recent success in global tax policy - and how that view can help fight climate change and inequality🧵👇 #OA @Global_Policy: doi.org/10.1111/1758-5…

Jeg har snakket med @MadsOlrik om hvad Trump (ikke) kommer til at betyde for det globale (skatte)samarbejde. Læs med, hvis du er til den optimistiske side - og hvis du ikke er! zetland.dk/historie/sJeBL…

Glad to have contributed to today’s @FT on the threat of global tax war under Trump II: on.ft.com/3C0IWpL

Efter Sanjay Shah-dommen, og fordi jeg har "udtalt mig kritisk" om udbytteskat-systemet, har jeg fået en masse spørgsmål om hvad man så burde gøre i stedet. Det svarede jeg på for to år siden, her: politiken.dk/debat/debatind…

Fascinating paper on how network effects may be the key to changing international tax policy:

Well, I did a thing. Link dead. Here's the right one: doi.org/10.1080/096922…

Why did research on 'corporate escape' fade in the 1980s–90s, just as profit shifting and tax haven use surged? With unique data, @mattiylonen and I argue losing trans-disciplinary knowledge and supportive institutions had severe consequences. 🧵👇 #OA: doi.org/10.1080/096922…

I've authored today's op-ed in Danish business newspaper Børsen, calling for calm among the doomsayers who believe Trump will inevitably kill the global minimum tax:

For the non-Danish readers, it's basically a slightly more elaborated version of this thread: x.com/phdskat/status…

@danieldbunn I've inadvertently galaxy brained it. They supress posts with links too, so.. yeh!

@phdskat It could've been on purpose! Make folks read the entire thread before getting the link.

It was an absolute joy to work on this; I'm so glad it's out. Tons of people to thank, and many have been already, but for me, most of all my brilliant co-author @mattiylonen, who is truly the brains (and the brawn) behind this paper. /ends

Our narrative (a goldmine of quirky historical bits) informs disciplinary history, re-introduces MNEs as study objects, and warns of the risks of 'forgetting' pioneering research on critical topics such as corporate power and inequality. Full paper: tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10…