Philip Krinks

2.8K posts

Philip Krinks

Philip Krinks

@philipkrinks

Faith, economics, philosophy and sport in unequal measure. Personal account.

Katılım Mayıs 2010
4.4K Takip Edilen633 Takipçiler
Philip Krinks
Philip Krinks@philipkrinks·
@Lux1090 Spot on. In large part they snookered themselves by mendaciously implying '10-24 saw sustained fiscal austerity which they could feasibly reverse
English
0
0
0
5
Matthew
Matthew@Lux1090·
Labour would need to be brutally honest with a public who *think* they lived through austerity and now deserve the Goodies, but to do so would destroy the party, probably more terminally than Ramsay MacDonald's in 1924/29. There isn't actually a way out here for Labour.
English
1
0
1
15
Matthew
Matthew@Lux1090·
People keep saying that Labour should stop attacking the Greens and instead put forward a positive Labour vision of this country, but I simply don't believe such a vision is possible. We don't live in the post-Cold War era of cheap credit and globalised trade.
English
1
0
0
34
Dr Stephen J Costello
Dr Stephen J Costello@drsjcostello·
Plato’s philosopher-king is much less about a political proposal and much more about a psychological ideal - the archetype of the integrated and individuated psyche/person
English
1
0
5
80
Philip Krinks
Philip Krinks@philipkrinks·
@anglofuturist @WTMAtkinson Isn't this like that joke where a union would be heavenly if it's the French who do the construction, cooking and love-making... or hellish if the Brits do!
English
0
0
1
137
Will 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿
I like to think about what the proposed Franco-British Union of 1940 would look like today. A superpower spanning from the British Isles to Mainland France to North Africa. Still in control of the Suez Canal. Edinburgh to Nice in 7hrs by Hyper-TGV. What could've been...
English
8
7
155
4.3K
Philip Krinks
Philip Krinks@philipkrinks·
@DespoticInroad Recognising you haven't yet finished the Five Year Plan, could you give us a hint of likely targets for, say, Tractor Production? I would not like to miss a target
English
0
0
0
90
Despotic Inroad
Despotic Inroad@DespoticInroad·
This is why the IEA/Adam Smith guys are deluding themselves thinking we can “reindustrialise” with some deregulation/N. Sea drilling. The Chinese have spent 50yrs doing aggressive industrial policy. The Americans are abandoning 50yrs of free trade orthodoxy to protect their industries behind tariff walls. The idea that the UK can rebuild a tired manufacturing sector with some supply-side reforms is a fantasy. We’ll need a heavy dose of upgraded dirigisme implemented by an agile, lean state with an empowered executive/improved capacity & freedom of action following reform of JR, ECHR relationship + stripping out of QUANGOcracy: 👉High levels of public investment, facilitated by BoE, if necessary 👉Leveraging public procurement to support/rebuild domestic producers 👉Shift of public spending from benefits/pensions to capital investment/infrastructure/R&D. Move to contributory/social insurance rather than means-tested welfare/pensions model 👉Mobilise pension funds to invest in strategic, domestic industries 👉Wholesale tax reform to shift revenue burden away from productive work/patient & productive investment towards unproductive asset wealth, land, real estate, short-term speculative investments etc. 👉Energy independence/abundance 👉Targeted protectionism/Capital controls to re-domesticate & tame footloose, globalised nature of British capital The whole state apparatus would have to be used to redirect & steer money towards key, essential sectors that are core to national resilience/autonomy. In the short-term that might feel like we’re living poorer, because it’s about a shift from day-to-day consumption to production + investment: fewer high street coffee options, more gigafactories; fewer choices on Deliveroo, more industrial robots; fewer competitive iPhone/car finance deals, more advanced materials labs + mass transit networks.
Tom Forth@thomasforth

Important bit of realism. Manufacturing in Britain, if we want to keep hold of it, will require protectionism or subsidy, like this. That will make us a bit poorer. Addressing high input costs (substantially energy for steel) would reduce that cost a bit, but it'll still be high.

English
19
33
255
24K
Philip Krinks
Philip Krinks@philipkrinks·
@andrew_lilico The WINDOW is 1. Orthodox solutions to our problems would be uncomfortable 2. Comfort is an absolute requirement 3. Let's do a comfy thing which surely can't make them worse
English
1
0
1
12
Sam Hall
Sam Hall@samuelhall0·
I completely agree with this from @pardoejw We need to break out of trying to solve every energy policy objective - e.g. poverty, jobs, R&D etc. - with a new levy We're in a doom loop with higher prices reducing demand, leaving fewer users to bear rising levy costs
Jack Pardoe@pardoejw

This report says the Treasury seems minded to raise bills for most to subsidise a rapidly growing many. I don't know if it's accurate or not, but here's why that's a bad idea anyway. 🧵 dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1…

English
1
3
7
1K
Philip Krinks
Philip Krinks@philipkrinks·
👀
Steven Swinford@Steven_Swinford

BREAKING Morgan McSweeney did not tell the Metropolitan Police who he was or where he worked when he called 999 after his phone was stolen The Metropolitan Police has released a transcript of the call and said that it was not aware 'of the victims employment or the particular security risks associated with his device or material on it The call took place on 20 October, 2025 at 22.30. McSweeney stated that it was a government phone Here is the verbatim transcript of the call in full: Call handler: Police, what's your emergency? Caller: Oh, hello, someone just robbed my phone. Call handler: Did they actually take it from you just now? Caller: Yeah Call handler: How did they get away? Caller: So he's on a bike. He's come onto the pavement to grab my phone and cycled off on a bike. Call handler: And where did this happen? Caller: It happened in Belgrave Street* in Westminster. *We now know that the incident took place in Belgrave Road, Westminster. The call handler inputs Belgrave Street and it provides a matching road name in Tower Hamlets, which is what is recorded in error. There are further references to locations near to Belgrave Street in Tower Hamlets later in the call, which compounds the issue. Call handler: And whose phone are you using now? Caller: I've got two phones. I'm using my personal one. That was my work one. Call handler: Can I take the phone number for this phone you're calling on? Caller: Yeah, 07XXXXXXXXX. Call handler: Thank you. And you said Belgrave Street, yeah? Caller: Yeah, just kind of going back to the location. Call handler: Don't put yourself at any risk. It's not worth it over a phone. I appreciate it’s frustrating. Call handler: And which way did they go towards, this suspect on a bike? Caller: He went. He travels north. I saw him for a few blocks. Call handler: So where were you when you last saw him? Have you got any idea? Caller: Yeah, so. Call handler: Did you get up to Stepney? Caller: Let me tell you where I got to. I'm just going back to where I can. Caller: So he turned right. Sorry, he turned left. There's a park on top of the road and he turned left there. Call handler: Stepney Green Park, ok. Caller: Yeah. He turned left there. Call handler: Can you remember anything about his appearance? Caller: Yeah, he was young. He was a black guy. He was on a bike. Call handler: About how young? Call handler: Just a guess. Caller: Teens. Late teens. Call handler: Was he skinny, tall, any idea? Caller: Yeah. He was slim. He was about average height. Call handler: Was it an e bike or pedal bike? Caller: Pedal bike. Call handler: Have you got a tracker on the phone at all? Caller: I do. It’s a government phone. Call handler: And it's your work phone. What kind of phone is it? Caller: It’s an iPhone. Call handler: Do you know what model? Caller: I don't. [PAUSE] Call handler: Right, just bear with me a second. Call handler: We would normally deploy to see you but at the moment, we are having extreme demand on police officers. So, I don't know if you would prefer to make your way home and make a crime report over the phone or online tomorrow. I mean, I can complete one with you now. I can pass this down, you can wait, but I honestly do not know how long you'll be waiting, Caller: If I could complete it now that would be good. Call handler: Ok. Call handler: What's your name, please? Caller: My name is XXXXXXXXXX. Call handler: XXXXXXXXXX? (repeats name back) Caller: Yeah. Call handler: And your date of birth, please? Caller: It's XXXXXX Call handler: Is XXXXXXXXX (surname) all one word? Caller: Yeah, (spells surname). Call handler: And what's your home address? Caller: (Provides non-London address) Call handler: So you live in XXXXXX? Caller: Yeah. Call handler: Are you staying anywhere while you're in London? Caller: Yeah. Call handler: Sorry, it just takes a little bit longer to deal with an address outside of the Met. I do apologise. Caller: It’s ok. Call handler: And may I take an email for you please (name)? Caller: Yeah, it's XXXXXXXXXXX@XXXXXXXXXX.com (personal email address) Call handler: You'll get a copy of the preliminary crime report through to that email. Call handler: How would you like to be contacted by an investigating officer? By email or phone? Caller: Phone, please. Or either, I’m not fussed. Call handler: Have you got any finance apps on the phone? Caller: No. Call handler: You'll need to change any passwords for any logins you do have on the phone. Caller: Yeah, okay. Call handler: You're not vulnerable in any way. Are you? Caller: No I’m not. Call handler: Do you believe there was any CCTV near where the incident happened? Caller: Might be. [Inaudible] away from location. Call handler: Don't worry. Don't return. No, I'll just put at the moment unknown. And obviously, if we find out more, we find out more. Call handler: Are you willing to make a statement to support the investigation? Caller: Definitely. Call handler: So what time did he actually snatch the phone? Caller: About two minutes before I rung you and I chased, and then I rang my office to get the phone tracked and then I rang you. Call handler: Okay, cool. It would have been about 25 past that you were robbed. Caller: A little before, about 23 minutes past, I think. Call handler: 23? Little bit before? Okay. [PAUSE] Call handler: Just bear with me, I’m just trying to get this system to accept the address. Sorry about this. I won't keep you much longer. Call handler: If you do get any tracking updates, what you do is you give us call back if the phone is stationary. Caller: Yeah. Call handler: And we can review attending then. We can't guarantee attending a moving phone at all, but if it's been stationary for a few… Call handler: It’s not accepting your address. Caller: I can give you my London address? Call handler: It’s alright. I've nearly got this to work. Caller: Okay Call handler: How long you staying in London? Caller: So I come to London every week. I work in London. Call handler: Oh, I see. Okay, that makes sense. Caller: So I'll be here till Thursday. Call handler: Okay. [PAUSE] Call handler: As I was trying to say, I've got this sorted now, so I'll be texting you a crime reference number in the next few moments. Along with the crime reference number will be a CHS reference number. If you need to give us a call back, you can call back giving that reference number from any device, and then we'll be able to link it straight away to your crime report and review deploying. We will need to know a bit more details about the phone itself, so when you're contacted by the investigating officer, or if you do get tracking details, you can call us back with the IMEI number, and the type of phone that it is that would be super helpful. Caller: All right, thank you. Call handler: All right, I’m just about to text you through the crime reference number now. Caller: Thank you so much. You’ve been really helpful. Call handler: No worries. All right, (name). You take care now, okay? Bye. Caller: Bye bye.

ART
0
0
0
77
Philip Krinks
Philip Krinks@philipkrinks·
@timothy_stanley Spot on. And when they understand that in many cases what 'run' means is 'persuade people in the area to do an unpaid labour of love as School Governors' ... ...
English
0
0
0
42
Tim Stanley
Tim Stanley@timothy_stanley·
People want their kids to go to a church school cos it's run well, but don't feel the church should run it. Mindblowing but, yes, people are that dumb.
English
19
32
518
13.7K
Professor Lucy Easthope
Professor Lucy Easthope@LucyGoBag·
Oooh Yvette’s husband is giving Wes such a tough time this morning - that could be awkward later on
English
5
0
14
1.9K
Philip Krinks
Philip Krinks@philipkrinks·
@NeilDotObrien Spot on. So it's only "Pride in (our) place(s)" from Labour. And by the way they're about to find those ain't their places anymore
English
1
1
3
1.2K
Neil O'Brien
Neil O'Brien@NeilDotObrien·
Labour are taking the mick now. "Pride in Place" funding will now be rationed on the basis of "community cohesion" Only their inner-city clients will get funding.
Neil O'Brien tweet media
English
49
163
910
60.3K
Philip Krinks
Philip Krinks@philipkrinks·
@KeejayOV3 In other news: Headmaster suspended for using big-faced child as satellite dish
English
0
0
2
48
Andrew Lilico
Andrew Lilico@andrew_lilico·
The best argument that Brexit was a mistake is the claim that it's turned out that the British political & governing class is too rubbish to run Britain properly without the EU's help. The counter-hope would be that that's only temporary, & they'll improve as they get used to it.
English
29
42
360
8.7K
Philip Krinks retweetledi
NT at Oxford
NT at Oxford@nt4ox·
Academic Dean with specialization in Biblical Studies, College of the Resurrection, Mirfield, W. Yorkshire, UK. Oversight of Durham University Common Awards Programme (Anglican). FT/permanent. NB short deadline: 22 March; interviews w/b 13 April. nt4ox.link/Mirfield26
English
1
3
5
913
Philip Krinks
Philip Krinks@philipkrinks·
@Steven_Swinford @breeallegretti I'm sure the OBR team are looking forward to hearing more details of her critique of their modelling, which they are always keen to improve
English
0
0
0
423
Steven Swinford
Steven Swinford@Steven_Swinford·
Exclusive from @breeallegretti Angela Rayner has privately criticised the OBR and suggested that Labour has 'over-corrected' in the wake of the Tories In a private call with City investors organised by BNP Paribas she said that the official forecaster had failed to recognise the benefits of increased public spending Rayner attacked the scoring methodology used by the OBR, which measures the expected cost and growth gains of government policies to calculate the amount of fiscal headroom, based on the chancellor’s rules She said that the government's drive to build more social housing was considered a cost without any recognition of the social benefits She argued that the OBR is 'preventing' the government from greater public spending because it 'doesn't account for the returns' properly Expect this to be a growing fault line as the elections in May approach thetimes.com/uk/politics/ar…
English
117
82
365
299.2K
Dario Perkins
Dario Perkins@darioperkins·
BoE is going to sacrifice the UK economy on the altar of the expectations fairy
English
14
11
234
27.4K