phillip

11.1K posts

phillip banner
phillip

phillip

@philliplede

Zoomer | Catholic | Philosophy

Katılım Ekim 2021
1.1K Takip Edilen2.1K Takipçiler
phillip
phillip@philliplede·
The Overman will make his descent in 2028.
English
1
0
9
494
phillip
phillip@philliplede·
This species of politician is worse than Lindsey Graham.
POLITICO@politico

Does @SenatorSlotkin call herself a Zionist? "I believe in a Jewish state of Israel, yes. And that to me isn't a radical thing to say,” she told @jmart at @POLITICOLive's Security Summit. “I can say that in the same breath that I criticize the military policy of Bibi Netanyahu."

English
0
0
4
351
phillip
phillip@philliplede·
Wordcel enjoyer
English
0
0
2
174
Richard Roberts
Richard Roberts@RichardRob10319·
@philliplede Hey @phiiiliplede I'm just a stupid old-gen conservative but even I wouldn't vote for a female jewish democrat over not voting at all. You realize that your vote is your consent right? Are you willing to stand on the corpses of all those dead children to make a statement?
English
3
0
3
212
phillip
phillip@philliplede·
Politics concerns actuality. In one sense this question is too specific (concerning a hypothetical), and in another sense not specific enough. It’s not clear whether Crowder is asking whether Nick would support a candidate who would categorize Iran as an adversary or one who would back aggressive military intervention against Iran for the purpose of degrading or toppling the regime. The former candidate in might think intervention insufficient to topple Iran’s regime. One the first point, it is weirdly specific in a bizarre, particular sense (this is not to say that all specificities are weird or uncalled for). Iran might not seek nuclear weapons if Israel did not exist to possess them, and so the existence of Israel is actually relevant in this regard.
English
2
0
0
202
Anodos
Anodos@Anad0s·
@philliplede I disagree. The whole point of a thought-experiment is precisely to be “weirdly specific” so as to isolate & clarify certain variables. The legitimacy of Crowder’s point hangs not on whether Israel actually exists, but on whether other things that exist are being properly weighed
English
3
0
0
256
phillip
phillip@philliplede·
This was a weirdly-specific question posed by Crowder. Crowder asked Fuentes whether he would support an “America First” presidential candidate who would back war in Iran in the hypothetical that Israel didn’t exist. We live in the actual world, where Israel does exist, and is the sole beneficiary of a costly war with Iran, and so the question is moot.
KaizerRev@Kaizerrev

Steven Crowder asks Nick Fuentes if he would vote for him if he ran for President. Nick - No, I can't.. I need America First.

English
9
1
137
10.2K
Pinball🍎❄️🔻▐┛
Pinball🍎❄️🔻▐┛@PinballWiz4rd·
Ah yes the time of evening at which my roommate autistically opens and slams all his cupboards and closets repeatedly for an hour straight
Pinball🍎❄️🔻▐┛ tweet media
English
6
0
30
639
phillip
phillip@philliplede·
90% of ‘looksmaxxing’ is losing weight provided you have a good bone structure.
English
0
2
58
1.1K
phillip
phillip@philliplede·
Irony does not translate over well on this app.
English
0
0
9
312
phillip
phillip@philliplede·
@aidannonx The TRT is actualizing your latent homosexual proclivities
English
1
0
19
445
Aidan
Aidan@aidannonx·
@philliplede I would support a candidate who runs on sodomizing you with a telephone pole on the front lawn of the WH
English
1
1
10
528
phillip
phillip@philliplede·
I want to learn to play the lyre.
English
0
0
8
254
phillip
phillip@philliplede·
I am a bad writer… obfuscatory and roundabout.
English
5
0
9
384
phillip
phillip@philliplede·
There are only three oppositions: the opposition of the created to the created, the opposition of the created to the uncreated, and the opposition of the uncreated to the uncreated. The prior two rest upon the last.
English
0
0
0
145
phillip
phillip@philliplede·
Hegel believed himself to be an orthodox Lutheran.
English
1
0
12
423
phillip
phillip@philliplede·
The only opposition that is essentially self-identical is the opposition of opposition to itself.
English
0
0
2
144