PolicyPage

Give PolicyPage a try!

@AmyKremer The goal posts move at every milestone

So many people keep talking about “winning the AI race” But what exactly does that mean? What is the finish line?

@OfficialLoganK Which niche categories in particular?

It’s easy to forget just how quickly the size of the pie (AI Market) is expanding in nearly every category

@CodeWithAmann Kickflip

TELL ME one thing you can do that Claude can’t.

@immasiddx Never heard of her

Does anyone even use Perplexity anymore? 😭

@lukeharries Have you seen those robots that box each other? Pretty entertaining.

My current ranking for jobs least impacted by AI: 1. Professionals sports and actors 2. Deal making (M&A + sales) 3. Capital allocators (VCs, PE, public market investors) 4. Regulated industries (doctors, lawyers)

@ThisThatOther2 Almonds!!

Fantastic news. We are not going to permit corporations to ruin our environment any longer.

@ABC Wonder what they’ll name these ones

Google will soon unleash a wealth of new artificial intelligence-powered tools and systems, including an AI assistant that will help users by proactively performing tasks on their behalf. Read more: abcnews.link/Zru9AXf

@DoctorFishbones Wikipedia did it first

Who is going to be held accountable when the AI gives you incorrect information

@Dr_Singularity I think we’re already there.

Soon, one teenager in a bedroom will have access to more intellectual labor than the entire Manhattan Project.

@chucktodd It’s all about people, who is attracting the best and the brightest to grow?

And one of the A.I. companies that seem huge and unstoppable at the moment will become AOL. Which one?

@CACandChill You just don’t see it. Google depends on ads, they’ll figure out how to make money of anything with AI.

Google had the talent, the money, the data and the head start… yet somehow still isn’t leading AI. Wild.

@0xSero We have to be able to produce hardware that can act upon all this software that’s been built in the past 20+ years!

All AI labs will shift focus from cyber security/coding to robotics by late 2027 Afterwards, manufacturing..

@Jayyanginspires Just don’t swipe up on a video and you’re golden

Whoever builds an actual durable solution to doomscrolling will be a multibillionaire.

@Ric_RTP Ever heard of over engineering??

Microsoft just banned its own engineers from using AI. The tool was literally costing MORE than the humans it was supposed to replace. They lied to you about AI adoption and now the whole narrative is blowing up: Microsoft gave thousands of engineers access to Claude Code six months ago and encouraged them to use it. Engineers loved it and adoption exploded. But then the invoices arrived. Token-based pricing means every query, every code review, every debugging session costs money. At scale across 100,000 engineers, the numbers became so large that Microsoft issued an internal order to cancel nearly all Claude Code licenses by end of June and force everyone onto their own cheaper tool instead. The company that invested $5 billion in Anthropic just told its own people to stop using Anthropic's product because it costs too much. Uber's story is even worse... Their CTO Praveen Neppalli Naga told The Information that the budget he planned for the full year was "blown away already" by April. Uber had rolled out Claude Code in December 2025. By March, 84% of their 5,000 engineers were using it with 70% of all committed code coming from AI systems. Heavy users were burning $500 to $2,000 per month each. Naga himself spent $1,200 in a single two-hour demo session. The company had even built internal leaderboards ranking engineers by how much AI they used. They literally gamified the spending and then ran out of money. Now look at what Nvidia's own VP of applied deep learning Bryan Catanzaro said to Axios last month. Direct quote: "For my team, the cost of compute is far beyond the costs of the employees." This is a VP at the company that SELLS the chips saying that using AI is more expensive than paying humans. Think about what this means for the entire AI narrative. Every CEO on every earnings call for the past two years has said the same thing: AI will make us more efficient, reduce headcount, and cut costs. The stock market rewarded every company that said it. Fired workers, stock goes up. Announced AI adoption, stock goes up. But the actual companies deploying AI at scale are discovering the math doesn't work. The MORE employees use AI, the HIGHER the bill. Goldman Sachs forecasts a 24x increase in token consumption by 2030 as companies adopt AI agents. Gartner just published a report showing that even though individual token prices will drop 90% by 2030, total enterprise AI costs will go UP because agents consume exponentially more tokens per task than basic tools. Meta built an internal dashboard called "Claudeonomics" to track which employees use the most AI. Amazon started pushing engineers to "tokenmaxx," their internal term for consuming as many AI tokens as possible. Both companies are spending hundreds of billions on AI infrastructure this year alone. And Microsoft, the company that bet its entire future on AI, just told 100,000 engineers to stop using the tool they liked best because the per-token bills got out of control. The companies building AI are telling investors it saves money. The companies using AI are finding out it costs more than the humans it was supposed to replace. And even the company that makes the chips just admitted it through its own VP. This is the gap nobody on Wall Street is pricing in. $725 billion in AI infrastructure spending this year across Big Tech. And the first companies to actually deploy these tools at scale are already pulling back because the economics don't work. What do you think?

@VraserX Nope life would get boring. It’s like when you do the infinite money glitch in any video game (I guess it’s not as common anymore). It gets boring when you have everything you can imagine.

Would you still support humanoid robots if they made your life cheaper… but made your profession unnecessary?

@Magdaview12 @PeterDiamandis The term is subjective

@policypage @PeterDiamandis There is no AI SLOP in X

A room full of graduates booed AI-centered commencement speeches, including Eric Schmidt's. I don't blame them. I blame us for not showing them what AI makes possible for THEM. Not for corporations. For them.

@Polymarket Not a crazy concept. Hiring a team to analyze a niche problem for tens of thousands of dollars is behind us. An army of agents would cost a fraction of the price. This will unfortunately decimate the entry level consulting profession. Where will college grads start?

NEW: AI is reportedly pushing McKinsey & rival consulting firms to rethink pricing, as clients are “questioning the value” of human advice.

@garrytan Garry for president!

Last year I asked Connie Chan to resign for her role in making San Francisco unsafe for Asian Americans This year she somehow got the endorsement from Pelosi Make it make sense. You can’t.