A. Healer

“So here is some Facts for everyone feel free to look up the code for your self and to Pierre Poilievre can we remove Carney just like the French are removing their opposition? What's good for the goose is good for the gander!! Section 32 of the Parliament of Canada Act made Mark Carney ineligible to be Liberal leader or a member of Parliament According to the Parliament of Canada Act, Section 32 Mark Carney was ineligible to be the Liberal leader and is ineligible to be a member of the House of Commons. The Trudeau government paid Mark Carney a salary, fee, wages, allowance, emolument or profit of any kind while he was the Liberal government‘s chief economic adviser. Parliament of Canada Act Ineligibility 32 (1) Except as specially provided in this Division, (a) no person accepting or holding any office, commission or employment, permanent or temporary, in the service of the Government of Canada, at the nomination of the Crown or at the nomination of any of the officers of the Government of Canada, to which any salary, fee, wages, allowance, emolument or profit of any kind is attached, is eligible to be a member of the House of Commons or shall sit or vote therein. Government advisors are typically paid, and their salaries can vary depending on their role, experience, and the specific government entity they work for. For almost 5 years Mark Carney was paid by the Government of Canada for serving the Trudeau government as an economic adviser. Last September Mark Carney joined Liberals as economic adviser and chair of a Liberal party task force on economic growth. Mark Carney didn’t volunteer his services. Mark Carney abused his role in the Trudeau government to obtain financial benefits for himself and for his business associates. Mark Carney used influence peddling to obtain government contracts for Brookfield Asset Management. From August 2020 to January 2025 Mark Carney worked for Brookfield Asset Management. In September 2024 when he joined the Liberals as economic adviser and chair of a Liberal party task force on economic growth Carney was Chair and Head of Transition Investing for Brookfield. Influence peddling, also known as traffic of influence or trading in influence, is the practice of using one’s connections with government or authorities to obtain favors or preferential treatment for another, often in return for payment, and is often associated with corruption. R. v. Carson By criminalizing influence peddling, s. 121(1) (d) of the Criminal Code , R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46 , strives to preserve both government integrity and the appearance of government integrity. It helps ensure that government activity is driven by the public interest and promotes confidence in our democratic process. Section 121(1)(d) provides that: 121 (1) Every one commits an offence who (d) having or pretending to have influence with the government or with a minister of the government or an official, directly or indirectly demands, accepts or offers or agrees to accept, for themselves or another person, a reward, advantage or benefit of any kind as consideration for cooperation, assistance, exercise of influence or an act or omission in connection with (i) anything mentioned in subparagraph (a)(iii) or (iv), or (ii) the appointment of any person, including themselves, to an office; Posted on March 22, 2025 By Paul W Kincaid Posted in News Tagged Brookfield Asset Management, influence peddling, Liberals, Mark Carney, Trudeau Government Post navigation Previous”

Horrifying. A suicide vest forced on an innocent boy by his own parents. This is a cult of death that teaches kids to become jihadis, where their own parents celebrate when they become martyrs. Not all cultures are the same. You can’t coexist with this.

Most of what you call deep woods isn’t old. It just feels that way. Back in the 1800s they cleared a lot more of the eastern U.S. than people realize. Not selective logging either. Whole hillsides cut, burned, turned into farms. By around 1900, places like Ohio, Indiana, Illinois were mostly open land. Some states were pushing 70% or more cleared. Then a lot of those farms failed or got abandoned. Soil wore out. People moved west or into cities. And the trees came back. So when you walk into the woods now and it feels untouched, a lot of the time you’re standing in what used to be a field 100–120 years ago. You can still see it if you slow down. You’ll run into stone walls way out in the middle of nowhere, nowhere near a house. Old fence lines cutting straight through trees that grew up around them. Even the trees themselves will line up in ways that don’t match how a forest is supposed to grow. The species are different too. Fast-growing stuff like maple and poplar took over a lot of places where older oak systems used to dominate. Fire used to move through these woods regularly. That’s mostly gone now, so everything grows thicker, tighter, different. It looks right at a glance. It feels old. But it isn’t what was there before.

Legacy media has lost the trust of the people.