ONE to ZERO ⟠

12.1K posts

ONE to ZERO ⟠ banner
ONE to ZERO ⟠

ONE to ZERO ⟠

@precyz

Gentlemen, gentlemen, gentlemen! There's a solution here you're not seeing💥

Interdimensional Cable Katılım Ocak 2017
4.4K Takip Edilen607 Takipçiler
ONE to ZERO ⟠
ONE to ZERO ⟠@precyz·
@grok: The winning strategies of the last 15 years are those that thrived with zero rates, QE, and unlimited liquidity: growth stocks (especially tech and mega-caps), momentum, and long-duration assets that benefited from very low discount rates. In the new regime of higher rates and inflation that's being repriced now, those will probably underperform. Heavily punished areas like value, commodities, or cyclical sectors could become structural winners.
Tobias Carlisle@Greenbackd

The world is exiting the post-2008 zero-rate era permanently. Long-term inflation and interest-rate expectations are repricing sharply higher across all major developed economies simultaneously. And in several countries, especially Japan, the UK, Germany, and France, the move is now approaching or exceeding the magnitude of the 2013 taper tantrum. Many of the winning strategies of the last 15 years may underperform the next regime. And many deeply out-of-favor areas could become structural winners rather than temporary trades.

English
1
0
0
14
ONE to ZERO ⟠ retweetledi
Cole Walmsley
Cole Walmsley@Cole_Walmsley·
“Inflation is back and higher rates are coming.” The U.S. Dollar is screwed. The Treasury must sell ~$2 trillion in new debt this year. Not to cover new spending. *Just to keep the lights on* and roll over old debt coming due. That old debt was issued at 1-2%. It's refinancing at 4.5%+. Interest expense on the national debt is approaching $1 trillion per year. It's now larger than the entire defense budget. Larger than Medicare. It's the fastest-growing line item in the federal budget, by far. Higher rates on rolled-over debt means bigger interest payments. Bigger interest payments mean bigger deficits. Bigger deficits mean more debt issuance. More debt issuance means higher supply of Treasuries. Higher supply of Treasuries means weaker demand. Weaker demand means higher yields. Higher yields means bigger interest payments... People call it a debt spiral. They're wrong. It's a death spiral. The loop feeds itself. Every basis point higher on the 10Y makes next year's refinance worse, which makes everything worse. The math compounds against the Treasury every single day yields stay here. The Fed has three doors out. All three open into the same room. Door 1: Cut rates Inflation re-accelerates *on top of* a 6.0% April PPI -- the hottest since 2022 -- and an April CPI that hit a near three-year high. Gasoline onto the fire. The dollar weakens. Foreign holders of US debt -- a third of the entire market -- watch their real returns get eaten by inflation, then take a second hit on the FX conversion back home. They sell, or demand higher yields to keep buying. The Fed cuts rates only to watch the market raise them. Their move backfires. Door 2: Hold rates. The $2 trillion in debt rolling over this year keeps refinancing from 1-2% into 4.5%+. Interest expense compounds. The deficit widens from interest alone, before a single new dollar of spending is approved. The bond market demands more premium to fund a borrower that looks worse every quarter. Yields drift higher even though the Fed didn't move. Door 3: Hike rates. Mortgages crack 7%. Auto delinquencies -- already at 32-year highs -- accelerate. Regional banks holding underwater Treasuries from the cheap-money era get squeezed like 2023 again. The kicker: the emergency facility that bailed them out last time is closed. Commercial real estate, sitting on hundreds of billions of debt refinancing in the next two years, gets repriced into a crater. Corporate borrowers refinancing from 2-3% into 7%+ start defaulting. And the Treasury *still* has to roll $2 trillion in debt over. At an *even higher rate* than before. The Fed crushes the economy *and* makes its own funding problem worse, in the same move. All three doors go to the same room: Impossible-math. The math always comes due. In fiat's case, the only historical route is currency debasement. The Fed eventually monetizes — explicitly through QE, or quietly through yield curve control, or via some politely-named new acronym. In other words, the purchasing power of the dollar gets destroyed to make the nominal debt serviceable. That's why they need inflation in the first place. The Fed needs inflation to make the debt math work. You pay the difference. Every dollar you hold loses value to make the equation work. It's the documented endgame of every fiat regime that has ever existed. Romans clipped the denarius. The Bank of England suspended gold convertibility. Weimar, Argentina, Zimbabwe, Lebanon, Turkey, Venezuela. Currency debasement, currency debasement, currency debasement. Sovereign nations always sacrifice the currency over the bond market. Always. It is the most consistent pattern in 5,000 years of monetary history. This is the future: They will print. They will inflate. The dollar will be debased. Your money will buy less, as it always has. The system will unwind through currency debasement. Quietly. Then loudly. Then suddenly. The bad news: if you're in the system, you will go down with it. The good news: you can exit. The exit strategy is simple. You *don't* exit through some clever trade that gets you more of the worthless money. You exit by shifting to a *different* monetary system. One that can't be printed, can't be debased, can't be voted on, and doesn't require trusting the people who built this trap to get you out of it. You already know what it is. Fix the money, fix the world.
The Kobeissi Letter@KobeissiLetter

Our 5th warning: The bond market crisis is intensifying. The US 10Y Note Yield is now officially above 4.55% for the first time since May 2025. After weeks of euphoria, the market is beginning to react today. As we have been stating for the last few weeks, the current situation in the bond market is unsustainable. We are now above levels seen when President Trump implemented a "90-day tariff pause" in April 2025 due to a collapsing bond market. Furthermore, the market now sees a 60%+ chance that the Fed's next move is an interest rate HIKE, with rate cuts entirely priced-out. We expect to see 7%+ mortgages next, all as auto loan delinquencies have reached 32-year highs. Inflation is back and higher rates are coming.

English
52
99
441
80.7K
ONE to ZERO ⟠
ONE to ZERO ⟠@precyz·
You know you’re winning when the competition partners with you because it’s mutually beneficial Hyperliquid
Yaugourt.hl@Yaugourt

Everyone is arguing about $USDH dying. They're missing the point entirely. What happened today is the single most important business move in Hyperliquid's history. Let me explain. Revenue, liquidity, politics, lobby, and what it means for the USDH vote debate. Coinbase is now the official treasury deployer of $USDC on Hyperliquid under AQAv2. Circle handles the technical side (CCTP, cross-chain infra). Both are staking hyperliquid:native. Native Markets agreed to sell the USDH brand assets to Coinbase. $USDH is sunsetting. But the mechanics it pioneered are not. They just got applied to a $4.7B asset instead of a $100M one. Let's break down why this is a win on every single front. LIQUIDITY The biggest complaint from traders and builders for months: fragmentation. $USDH had the alignment but not the liquidity. $USDC had the liquidity but not the alignment. You had to choose. That choice is gone. One stablecoin. One orderbook per pair. No split liquidity. No confusion for HIP-3 deployers picking a quote asset. No friction for new users bridging in. $4.7B in USDC on Hyperliquid, 2x year over year. That is the base generating yield now, not $100M. REVENUE Under AQAv2, the treasury deployer shares 90% of the reserve yield revenue with the protocol. Run the numbers on the current $USDC supply: $4.7B at 3.8% interest rate, 90% shared with the Assistance Fund = $160M+ per year flowing directly into HYPE buybacks. That is $440K per day. Every day. For context, USDH at peak supply was generating a fraction of this on $100M. The AQA model worked. It just needed to be applied at the right scale. POLITICS AND LOBBYING This is the angle most people are sleeping on. Coinbase is the largest publicly traded crypto company in the US. They spent over $100M on crypto lobbying and political action in the last cycle. They are the single most powerful voice for crypto regulation in Washington. The CLARITY Act markup is happening today. Coinbase has been one of its strongest advocates. Having them financially aligned with Hyperliquid, staking HYPE, operating as treasury deployer, is not just a liquidity play. It is a regulatory shield. Every conversation about "is Hyperliquid a US regulatory risk" just got a lot harder to make when Coinbase is literally staked into the network. Circle staking 500K HYPE and moving toward becoming a validator. Jeremy Allaire posting "Hyperliquid." That is institutional endorsement at the highest level. THE USDH QUESTION "Was USDH a failure?" "Was the vote theater?" "Did Native Markets just flip an asset?" No. USDH was a weapon. It was a credible threat that proved a protocol can demand yield sharing from stablecoin issuers. Before USDH, Hyperliquid had $5B+ in USDC generating $150-200M/year for Circle and Coinbase. The protocol saw none of it. USDH launched. The AQA model proved that yield can be redirected onchain, transparently, back to the protocol. It only reached $100M in supply but that was never the point. The point was forcing incumbents to the table. Basit said it best: the entire lifecycle of USDH from launch to sunset should be studied. Coinbase didn't come to Hyperliquid out of goodwill. They came because USDH proved they would lose the venue if they didn't align. "But Paxos offered better economics during the vote." Maybe on paper. But 95-100% of a stablecoin that might have also struggled to reach $100M in supply is still less revenue than 90% of $4.7B. The vote was never about picking the best yield split on a small asset. It was about creating the leverage to capture yield on the dominant one. WHAT THIS MEANS FOR BUILDERS USDC becomes the canonical quote asset for HIP-4 outcome markets. No more guessing which stablecoin to build around. Hyper Foundation is issuing grants to HIP-3 and HIP-1 deployers who integrated USDH to cover migration costs. Feeless conversions from USDH to USDC during the transition. For HIP-3 deployers running equity perps, commodity perps, outcome markets: one liquidity pool, one collateral asset, deeper books. SECOND ORDER EFFECTS Coinbase operating perps through Hyperliquid via builder codes? Not confirmed, but now structurally possible. Their existing perp product is weak. Hyperliquid's infrastructure is the best in crypto. The incentive alignment is there. Tether now has a clear path to compete. AQAv2 is an open spec. Any stablecoin issuer can stake 500K HYPE and share yield to become an aligned quote asset. Competition is good. AQAv2 becomes a blueprint for every other chain. Hyperliquid just proved that a protocol can force the largest stablecoin issuers in crypto to share revenue at the protocol level. No one has done this before. Hyperliquid.

English
0
0
1
11
ONE to ZERO ⟠ retweetledi
Zynx
Zynx@ZynxBTC·
The American banks scored a spectacular own goal today. In lobbying aggressively to suppress stablecoin yield, they have inadvertently pushed capital towards Bitcoin backed fixed income products that offer yields they cannot compete with. The Clarity Act passed the Senate Banking Committee today. 15-9. The most contentious issue was stablecoin yield. The American Bankers Association reportedly contacted Senate offices more than 8,000 times in a single weekend to gut the compromise language. Why? Because yield-bearing stablecoins compete directly with bank deposits. They want to keep paying you 0.1% while earning 4% on your money. The compromise bans passive yield on simply holding stablecoins but allows activity-based rewards. The banks won that battle. However, they will not have the last laugh. By suppressing yield on stablecoins, they have pointed millions of people toward $STRC and $SATA. 11.5% and 13% yield respectively. Bi-monthly and daily dividends, backed by the hardest asset ever created. The banks won the battle but have no idea they are losing the war.
English
30
81
764
23K
ONE to ZERO ⟠ retweetledi
Milk Road
Milk Road@MilkRoad·
Our AI researcher just upped his crypto bag. The guy who lives inside compute, chips, and data center buildouts is buying $ETH. Here's why this is worth your time (save this): Vincent has been all over the AI compute trade this year. Bloom Energy $BE, Infineon Technologies $IFNNY, Tesla $TSLA... (So when he moves out of his lane and adds a crypto position, it gets our attention) His thesis on $ETH comes down to three things. 1. The long-term call. If AI agents become real economic actors, transacting with each other, paying for compute, settling work between businesses, they need a neutral rail to do it on. Vincent thinks $ETH is the most likely beneficiary if that plays out. He's not betting on next quarter as much as he is positioning for a multi-year shift in how value moves online. 2. The chart. $ETH is sitting one standard deviation below its long-term log trend. That kind of stretch doesn't happen often. The last few times it did, you were looking at a price many people regretted ignoring twelve months later. 3. The macro setup. Oil has been creeping higher. If that feeds into inflation, real rates start moving toward negative territory. Historically, that backdrop has been very kind to crypto, as long as the Fed is not hiking into it. (And we're not in a hiking cycle right now.) The other piece: nobody is talking about crypto right now. All the air, all the liquidity, all the capital is being sucked into AI compute names. Vincent is already on the inside of that trade. He sees potential for a future rotation and is getting in before it shows up in price. So he's starting to DCA. Want to see the exact size of his $ETH position and how he's pacing the buys? Link in the first comment.
Milk Road tweet media
English
6
14
88
55.2K
ONE to ZERO ⟠ retweetledi
moritz
moritz@onchainmo·
I sold all my crypto a year ago and went all in on stocks and silver. I am now up 30% on my stock portfolio and 150% on silver. While at the same time, I’d be down 50% if I had continued holding crypto. It was one of the most impactful investment decisions of my life. I know a ton of people who made a lot of money in crypto. But many missed the exit and kept bagholding tokens down 70%. A lot of people in crypto have this hatred toward TradFi, and I honestly don’t understand why. The reality is that the S&P 500 will continue to be an up-only chart over the next 100 years if you zoom out. Meanwhile, most crypto tokens will probably continue trending toward zero.
The Kobeissi Letter@KobeissiLetter

BREAKING: S&P 500 futures surge to a fresh record high, now on track for the 7th-straight weekly gain. The S&P 500 is nearing a gain of +$11 trillion in market cap in 7 weeks. Absolutely incredible.

English
138
39
654
177.4K
ONE to ZERO ⟠
ONE to ZERO ⟠@precyz·
Believe in somETHing
MTS@MTSlive

.@VitalikButerin on why a 1,000-year lifespan wouldn't get boring: "Even if we lived to 1,000 years old, we're not gonna get bored. We're gonna keep creating new worlds for ourselves." "Everything around us, the people, the world, changes so much over 10 years that it almost might as well be a death and a rebirth." "15 years ago, it was normal for close friends to not talk to each other for days. Doesn't that sound crazy now?" "In the first 20 years of your life you're a learner, a consumer. You're someone playing games that other people set up for you. One of the big transitions as you grow up is getting into more of a role of actually being the one that has to create and define and contribute to the games yourself." @sodofi_ @binji_x

English
0
0
0
7
ONE to ZERO ⟠ retweetledi
EndGame Macro
EndGame Macro@onechancefreedm·
Know When To Hold ’Em, Know When Insiders Fold ’Em One of the cleaner tells in this market is not what people are saying. It is what insiders are doing. Over the past year, Mag 7 insiders reportedly net sold about $16.3B in shares. Amazon was the largest piece at roughly $10.9 Billion. Nvidia was around $4.1 Billion. Meta, Google, Apple, and Microsoft also saw meaningful insider selling. Across tech, the insider buy to sell ratio was around 0.14, which basically means insiders sold about $7 for every $1 they bought. Now, not every insider sale is some dark signal. Executives sell for taxes, diversification, option exercises, and scheduled 10b5-1 plans. That is normal. But the size and timing matter. When the people closest to the companies are mostly taking liquidity, while retail, passive flows, AI ETFs, and chip ETFs are aggressively buying the same names, that tells you something about who is providing supply and who is absorbing it. The public is buying the story. Insiders are selling the stock. That does not mean a crash has to happen tomorrow. Markets can stay irrational, concentrated, and momentum driven for longer than people expect. But it does challenge the idea that this is all broad, durable confidence. It looks more like a late cycle liquidity event, where informed holders reduce exposure into maximum enthusiasm. That is usually how these things work near the end of a boom. The narrative gets louder. The flows get stronger. The public gets more confident. And the people with the best view of the underlying businesses quietly take chips off the table.
English
5
19
94
10.2K
ONE to ZERO ⟠ retweetledi
Mirza 🥷
Mirza 🥷@mirza·
Injective will be the center of tokenization and RWAs. We have been quiet for too long but the intense work my team has put in behind the scenes for the past two years is finally coming together and the upcoming launches will redefine finance forever. No one is ready.
Injective 🥷@injective

OFFICIAL ANNOUNCEMENT Music IP is set to be a $200B asset class. None of it is onchain. Today we're partnering with Musicow to change that with one of the largest tokenization efforts in crypto. Stay tuned as we reveal some of the biggest global artists in the coming months.

English
15
26
200
4.9K
ONE to ZERO ⟠
ONE to ZERO ⟠@precyz·
@kurtblast Too much inflation can lead to demand destruction, especially when people can no longer access credit and can’t afford their heaping debt piles
English
0
0
0
5
ONE to ZERO ⟠
ONE to ZERO ⟠@precyz·
@GeneralSar Yes and no. They benefit from interest payments on short-dated Treasuries but may suffer from declining trading activity and token prices if rate hikes further stress consumers and force them to sell
English
1
0
0
49
General Sar
General Sar@GeneralSar·
Am I right to say that rate hikes: Bullish for CRCL, COIN because the yield they gain will increase and provide a boost to the balance sheet. Bearish for CRCL, COIN because in general people are not putting their money in USDC and will move to bonds etc? Someone confirm!
The Kobeissi Letter@KobeissiLetter

There it is folks: Interest rate futures now see a BASE CASE of the next Fed move being a rate HIKE. In fact, the odds of the Fed cutting interest rates before July 2027 are a mere 1%. As inflation hits its highest level since 2023, the Fed is left with no option. All as Consumer Confidence just hit a record low and the labor market is weakening under the surface. Rate hikes into stagflation are coming.

English
1
0
2
163
ONE to ZERO ⟠ retweetledi
Raoul Pal
Raoul Pal@RaoulGMI·
@blknoiz06 There is no other choice. If the US doesn't China wins the intelligence race. China can't allow it to happen either or the US wins. This is the biggest race/competition of all time and there can be no winner and no loser.
English
24
14
415
42.9K
ONE to ZERO ⟠ retweetledi
Ryan Watkins
Ryan Watkins@RyanWatkins_·
The more I think about this Coinbase partnership, the more I believe it is Hyperliquid’s biggest announcement all year. Stablecoin yield is the largest revenue source in the industry next to trading fees and Hyperliquid is now the first blockchain to internalize both. This is a fundamental transformation of Hyperliquid as a business. Yield sharing enables Hyperliquid’s revenue to scale more directly with deposits, rather than just trading volume. And because deposits tend to be stickier than volumes in downturns, this could make Hyperliquid’s buybacks more resilient across cycles. For example Hyperliquid stablecoin deposits are currently only down 15% from ATHs compared to monthly volumes down 55%. Zooming out, there’s currently ~$80B in stablecoins deposits on Binance, Okx, and Bybit compared to ~$5B on Hyperliquid. It doesn’t take crazy share gains or sector wide growth for the revenue numbers from yield sharing to get crazy for $HYPE. Think $300M - $500M in incremental run-rate revenue from yield sharing is achievable within next 12 months, and billions in the years beyond as the cryptoeconomy reaccelerates. Hyperliquid.
Ryan Watkins@RyanWatkins_

Massive Coinbase x Hyperliquid partnership that could bring $135M - $160M in revenue for $HYPE from USDC yield sharing. Big positive surprise to now have the largest U.S. regulated crypto business aligned with Hyperliquid.

English
29
53
426
42.5K