Proof

@xoxo_tidiest @EditsGoesHard Go back to reddit

@prooooff @EditsGoesHard You must be fun at parties

@Invincisure @gwrgura @EditsGoesHard I'm not rage baiting, i'm just stating simple truths and manchildren like you are losing it lmao. Seethe

@gwrgura @EditsGoesHard lmao stay mad. degenerate

@gwrgura @EditsGoesHard Cars? Lol. LMAO. HAHAHAA CARS?? There is something childish about a CHILDREN'S movie you irredeemable stain on society. You should consider ending your life. And your english is attrocious. You couldn't understand a Dr Seuss book.

@gwrgura @EditsGoesHard you responded to me first lol. you are insecure about your childlike interests

@gwrgura @EditsGoesHard i'm sorry i hurt your feelings. grow up. you're fantasizing about cars being 'hard' and 'heroic' as if they're real. you literally have tiktok edits saved from a children's movie

@gwrgura @EditsGoesHard Holy shit lmao. This is embarassing. I think I might actually kms if I liked this content

@lavelafetsha @EditsGoesHard How old are you?

@prooooff @EditsGoesHard

@Hugo_Fucyoselv @AMK_Mapping_ @iykehills He clearly did not mean that and if he did then he’s a true fucking moron because that makes absolutely no sense in the context of his sentence. Use your brain if it exists.

@prooooff @AMK_Mapping_ @iykehills 200 rocket salvos sweetheart, meaning 200 different occasions of launching rockets not 200 at once. I know your brain can’t comprehend it but ask your 5 year old he’ll understand.

@iykehills Iran never fired a 200 rocket salvo or even 20 rocket salvo during this war.

@Hugo_Fucyoselv @AMK_Mapping_ @iykehills Are you moronic? How does his sentence make any sense if he is not referring to one salvo of 200 rockets? No amount of backtracking can save him from that blatantly incorrect statement.

@AMK_Mapping_ @iykehills He said 200 rocket salvos cupcake, and why continue to post horse shit with your super sleuth open source nonsense. You think Iran posts every missile launch? Turn off Live UA map for a bit and go to sleep.

@aimeeterese "Iran is like when WOMEN. I'm so insightful!"

@aimeeterese This type of reddit tier midwit political analysis should disqualify you from discussing any remotely intellectual subject or topic for the rest of your life.

Iran is basically a woman who keeps escalating & daring you to hit her. Unless you smack her in the face early in this silly little game of brinksmanship, she will continue to escalate. She needs to know you’re not bluffing & that when you refrain from subjecting her to brutal violence, it’s because you’re treating her with the grace and courtesy that she has earned from you, not because you’re unable or unwilling to smack her when warranted. Women who are total maniacs need to know that you’ll smack them into line when required, in order to feel safe and contained in the relationship. The Iranians are maniacal women who need to be smacked into line & shown who is boss.

@dash_eats @nkulw I recall you saying palestinians are animals who deserve to be imprisoned in Gaza, and that you educated yourself on the conflict by reading Dershowitz. I can pull receipts if you want

@nkulw No I haven’t ? But I wasn’t asking you so tone down the Jewish aggression

Dasha go fuck yourself, you and your moron friend have been captains of the dead baby brigade for years now

@feminystopia @RichardBSpencer No it refers to his time on fox. He was put on a leash and couldn’t say what he truly believes

@RichardBSpencer The "PHD in doublespeak" comment obviously relates to the disingenuity and craftiness of many of the politicians, media executives, and others he has dealt with/interviewed over the years. The manic laugh is some combination of ex-druggy psychic shock, and goofy shtik.

A psychological theory of Tucker's creepy laugh

No one knows the horror of the genocide better than an IDF drone operator. No wonder he killed himself.

@PaulSkallas Greek democracy. Roman republic. Historical literacy is not your strong suit.

you can't really spread monarchy now. Nations rarely go back to monarchies once they have been toppled and transition to republics. Just France during Napoleon (and then back to a republic). once sovereignty moves from a person to “the people,” it’s nearly impossible to reverse. Even modern monarchies that survive, like in the Gulf, were never overthrown in the first place.

In the West Bank,Israel takes Palestinians from their homes every single day. No posters.No headlines. No outrage.

Hind Rajabs words on a mobile phone as Israel was murdering her. ‘“I’m not talking because every time I talk blood comes out of my mouth & makes my clothes dirty and I don’t want my mom to have to clean it.”

@Alexand82236830 @History__Speaks @BoxLoner The instant deflection when you’re proven wrong

The hasbara streamer @BoxLoner and others continually insist that limiting civilian fatalities in Gaza would've been historically difficult. On the contrary: a military trying to limit civilian casualties would've encountered factors in Gaza that made this task much easier than in typical urban warfare (as well as factors that made Gaza considerably more difficult than typical urban warfare). It would've been a mixed bag in other words, not a 'historically difficult environment.' In terms of factors that would've made civilian-casualty mitigation much easier than usual: the big one is Hamas armaments, or more specifically its lack thereof. Astonishingly in view of all the "Nazi Germany" comparisons, al-Qassam had zero tanks, zero armored vehicles, and zero artillery—assets that define conventional armies and typically lead to prolonged, destructive engagements that cause lots of collateral damage. (It also had zero planes and ships.) If you look at the combat that Hamas-IDF actually engaged in, it is not of the sort that is likely to cause high levels of civilian fatalities. The combat we saw between the belligerents in Gaza was not the kind of widespread, sustained firefight, featuring the use of explosive weapons amid civilians; the type of engagement that could spiral into indiscriminate destruction and massive collateral damage. Hamas mostly carried out guerrilla warfare in evacuated areas. (Of course, during the genocide, most Gazans were not killed in anything resembling "combat" or "war" in a traditional sense, but massacred in "where's daddy?" bombings of homes and tents, and mowed down in free-fire zones. It is important to note this even as it's outside the scope of our hypothetical.) While Gaza was indeed very densely populated, Gazans were able to evacuate from areas the IDF invaded and occupied. (Like Assad in Aleppo, the IDF issued these evacuation orders for military purposes, not for humanitarian reasons, about which I can elaborate.) Hamas to its discredit tried to badger and propagandize civilians to stay in place—and again, it did this for military reasons—but unlike the Syrian rebels in Aleppo, ISIS in Mosul, or the Viet Cong, etc, it didn't actually force civilians not to evacuate at any substantial scale. The (nonsense) argument of the Israel flunkies in this regard does contain two kernels of truth. The 1) remarkably extensive tunnel system in Gaza, paired with 2) the high population density, would've posed major challenges for a hypothetical military seeking to limit civilian casualties. But these two factors would've been offset by the favorable factors—the nature of IDF engagement with Hamas, Hamas's lack of artillery and tanks, the viability of evacuation—I mentioned above. All of this is quite hypothetical because in practice the IDF, far from seeking to limit civilian fatalities in good faith, committed a genocide in Gaza. The points I mentioned above should still be raised against the Israel flunkies and whitewashers, like Lonerbox, who absurdly claim Gaza was a more difficult urban warfare environment than anywhere else ever. Gaza was a mixed bag, with unique difficulties combined with uniquely favorable conditions for civilian harm mitigation.