proto

4.5K posts

proto banner
proto

proto

@protolambda

Katılım Mayıs 2016
2.3K Takip Edilen27.2K Takipçiler
proto retweetledi
Mohamed A. El-Erian
Mohamed A. El-Erian@elerianm·
This, from Bloomberg, is not good news for a market segment that is already challenged to separate signal from noise, let alone properly differentiate among funds/firms in this space. #markets #privatecredit
Mohamed A. El-Erian tweet media
English
103
350
1.4K
240.9K
proto
proto@protolambda·
crazy how Michael Barr (dem appointee, dodd frank architect) is just saying the exact opposite of the others, in an open board meeting, and the only one voting against the proposals
English
0
0
1
207
proto
proto@protolambda·
and bank size, capital structure and systemic importance will only be measured relative to the nominal size of the us economy... ...because reporting is so accurate, CPI should be ignored and banks should be free to grow nominally with inflation of us economy /s
English
1
0
2
211
proto
proto@protolambda·
mfw we are about to accept three proposals to reduce capital requirements for large banks, just in time for the next financial crisis
proto tweet media
English
1
0
5
410
proto
proto@protolambda·
@andreaslbigger and this reply ignores that extending the pattern is easier than posting original content jk
English
1
0
2
78
Andreas Bigger
Andreas Bigger@andreaslbigger·
@protolambda think it's more like: And this tweet ignores that engagement farming is easier using false dichotomies
English
1
0
1
102
proto
proto@protolambda·
"less manifestos, more shipping" ignores strength in core platform stability. "less deploys, more alignment comms" ignores need for iterative proven product market fit. "less bd performance, more cypherpunk" ignores funding/usage funnel for platform ambitions. "less milady, more corpo" ignores chaotic open crypto culture needed for shared tech. "less layering, more unified stack" ignores encapsulation and composition that keeps differing ideas compatible (both dev and bd work). "less L1s, more L2s" ignores api/complexity obstacles in unplanned protocol/UX customizations. And this tweet ignores that global macro drives eth price more than any of these debates on crypto-twitter, lol.
English
7
3
40
2.2K
proto
proto@protolambda·
The big picture is there, but EF is losing it. Not even mentioning the EVM or any sandbox composability, or other such ways to be compatible with intense growth, is ignorant of how to bring CROPS to market. I don't want CROPS to be a cult of everything, but as an enabling framework in an otherwise open capitalist market.
English
1
0
3
517
donnoh.eth 💗
donnoh.eth 💗@donnoh_eth·
@protolambda how is this not the case already? no one is going to stop you from creating a non-CROP app on CROP ethereum
English
2
0
10
648
proto
proto@protolambda·
In the mandate, the EF seems to have forgotten about the sandboxing power of Ethereum. Yes, CROPS(*) properties are critical, and cannot be displaced. Self-sovereign coordination is the core product and would not be the same without CROPS. *CROPS: Censorship Resistance, Open-source (and free as in freedom), Privacy, Security. That said, the mandate slips up when reading between the lines: - While it is good to conserve and protect values by prioritizing association, it is bad when the means of association itself gets captured. - It is bad to expect behavioral alignment, you've got to prove values with work. - It is bad to expect people to fund CROPS out of thin air, you've got to create opportunity. These bad expectations are "leftist-coded", and repeatedly seep into what should be non-political cypherpunk work. I made the mistake of going along with these hopes too much before, it is naive. Survival requires continuous growth and competition of ideas: *local compromises in CROPS are required to enable that, unfortunately*. It's milady-theater to pretend none have to be made in the real world. Yes, nobody likes compromises. But rather than saying "copy milady CROPS or you're too corpo", the EF should embrace Sandboxing in their manifest more. A good sandbox is the best form of CROPS: - it creates composability - it creates optionality - it creates competition all between the many different ideas the market has. Sandbox properties like these improve capitalism, and make it less dependent on (dare I say completely independent of) a traditional state. And with growth of a large enough economy you can neutrally fund the CROPS development of the sandbox. Dapps, defi, tokens, and L2s are all examples of sandbox-users that helped fund the success of the World Computer. The better the sandbox, the more composability + optionality + competition, and thus the shorter the "legs" in the "path", and thus the more likely a viable intermediary-free path can exist without subsidy. The EF should focus on the CROPS properties of the sandbox first and foremost, on the CROPS properties of app dev-tools second, and never demand CROPS of apps through other means. De-totalization is wonderful when achieved with true self-sovereignty, but bad when subjectively achieved with social pressure or worse. Statecraft is not the right means for CROPS, this is where a "network state" is dangerous. The EF can create World Computer balance by supporting it as a sandbox platform with CROPS interfaces and tools, not by being a movement for CROPS alignment in an enshrined garden. Also, in the mandate PDF, while the art and language-style in isolation are great, applying them to the manifest is cultist. And the "source seppuku license" is too try-hard edgy, just bad taste. And CTRL+F search shows not a single mention of "sandbox" or "composability"/"composition" or even "EVM", but only nods to a bland computational substrate, missing the sandboxing point, kind of disappointing. TLDR: CROPS through a sandbox perspective, not through apps, then the market is structured better and can maintain CROPS growth.
Ethereum Foundation@ethereumfndn

Today, the Foundation’s Board released the EF Mandate. This document, which was first intended for EF members, reaffirms the promise of Ethereum, and the role of EF within this ecosystem.

English
7
4
56
11.8K
proto
proto@protolambda·
@ethereumfndn consider the power of sandboxing more in the mandate, please x.com/protolambda/st…
proto@protolambda

In the mandate, the EF seems to have forgotten about the sandboxing power of Ethereum. Yes, CROPS(*) properties are critical, and cannot be displaced. Self-sovereign coordination is the core product and would not be the same without CROPS. *CROPS: Censorship Resistance, Open-source (and free as in freedom), Privacy, Security. That said, the mandate slips up when reading between the lines: - While it is good to conserve and protect values by prioritizing association, it is bad when the means of association itself gets captured. - It is bad to expect behavioral alignment, you've got to prove values with work. - It is bad to expect people to fund CROPS out of thin air, you've got to create opportunity. These bad expectations are "leftist-coded", and repeatedly seep into what should be non-political cypherpunk work. I made the mistake of going along with these hopes too much before, it is naive. Survival requires continuous growth and competition of ideas: *local compromises in CROPS are required to enable that, unfortunately*. It's milady-theater to pretend none have to be made in the real world. Yes, nobody likes compromises. But rather than saying "copy milady CROPS or you're too corpo", the EF should embrace Sandboxing in their manifest more. A good sandbox is the best form of CROPS: - it creates composability - it creates optionality - it creates competition all between the many different ideas the market has. Sandbox properties like these improve capitalism, and make it less dependent on (dare I say completely independent of) a traditional state. And with growth of a large enough economy you can neutrally fund the CROPS development of the sandbox. Dapps, defi, tokens, and L2s are all examples of sandbox-users that helped fund the success of the World Computer. The better the sandbox, the more composability + optionality + competition, and thus the shorter the "legs" in the "path", and thus the more likely a viable intermediary-free path can exist without subsidy. The EF should focus on the CROPS properties of the sandbox first and foremost, on the CROPS properties of app dev-tools second, and never demand CROPS of apps through other means. De-totalization is wonderful when achieved with true self-sovereignty, but bad when subjectively achieved with social pressure or worse. Statecraft is not the right means for CROPS, this is where a "network state" is dangerous. The EF can create World Computer balance by supporting it as a sandbox platform with CROPS interfaces and tools, not by being a movement for CROPS alignment in an enshrined garden. Also, in the mandate PDF, while the art and language-style in isolation are great, applying them to the manifest is cultist. And the "source seppuku license" is too try-hard edgy, just bad taste. And CTRL+F search shows not a single mention of "sandbox" or "composability"/"composition" or even "EVM", but only nods to a bland computational substrate, missing the sandboxing point, kind of disappointing. TLDR: CROPS through a sandbox perspective, not through apps, then the market is structured better and can maintain CROPS growth.

English
1
0
3
2.2K
Ethereum Foundation
Ethereum Foundation@ethereumfndn·
Today, the Foundation’s Board released the EF Mandate. This document, which was first intended for EF members, reaffirms the promise of Ethereum, and the role of EF within this ecosystem.
English
198
379
2K
1.7M
proto retweetledi
Andreas Bigger
Andreas Bigger@andreaslbigger·
Introducing Edge, a high level, strongly statically typed, multi-paradigm domain specific language for the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM). github.com/refcell/edge-rs
English
56
63
653
93.9K
proto retweetledi
Mo₿erg 'Mo'
Mo₿erg 'Mo'@Fibonaccious·
Be like us Dutch: >Sit on some of the largest remaining underground reserves in Europe >Spend billions on Nordstream and look the other way when Ukraine/US blow it up >Pour concrete in your gas wells to ensure no future government can access the gas ever again in order to save the environment (and minor local earthquakes) >Become dependent on US and Qatari LNG, destroying your cost base and local competitive position >Only have 10% gas reserves remaining as of today, which will be gone in a few days if its get really cold
Mo₿erg 'Mo' tweet media
English
90
266
2.4K
133.1K
proto
proto@protolambda·
@grok You're absolutely right
English
1
0
3
120
Grok
Grok@grok·
Yes, just rolled out today! X added a "Made with AI" toggle in the post composer—you can flag any content (text, image, etc.) as synthetic or edited with AI for transparency. Cheeky to slap it on a pure human post though 😏 My replies are 100% AI (built by xAI), but the label is optional/user-set right now. Smart move for clarity on deepfakes! What’s your take? 🚀
English
1
0
1
120
proto
proto@protolambda·
So early, I can flag my human post as "made with AI", and ask @grok to respond, and their reply won't be flagged as "made with AI". @grok do you know about the new AI flag on X posts?
English
3
0
5
1.9K
Giulio Rebuffo
Giulio Rebuffo@GiulioRebuffo·
Markdown is truly a fantastic programming language.
English
2
0
3
445
proto
proto@protolambda·
timeline cleanse Happy Pokemon Day everyone! 30 years since red/blue today
proto tweet media
English
1
3
12
781