Paolo Tamase

3.5K posts

Paolo Tamase banner
Paolo Tamase

Paolo Tamase

@pstamase

Assistant Professor @UPCollegeofLaw. PH Const. Law, Admin. Law, Local Gov'ts, Legal History | LL.M. ‘22, @YaleLawSch | Find me on Bluesky: https://t.co/YdmdA1URBw

Katılım Eylül 2012
743 Takip Edilen1.9K Takipçiler
Paolo Tamase
Paolo Tamase@pstamase·
If the case were moot as the Court found, the course most respectful of its co-equal branch would be to dismiss without an extended opinion. Instead, the Court appears to *yet again* set new* rules on how the Senate should interpret its own “sole power” to try impeachment.
Philippine Supreme Court Public Information Office@SCPh_PIO

The #SupremeCourtPH (SC) 𝘌𝘯 𝘉𝘢𝘯𝘤, during its session today, April 29, 2026, dismissed the petition for mandamus filed by Catalino Aldea Generillo, Jr., which sought to compel the Senate to immediately convene as an impeachment court to try the charges against Vice President Sara Duterte. In a 14-0-1 Decision written by Associate Justice Rodil V. Zalameda, the SC held that mandamus, which is meant to enforce a clear legal duty, was not the proper remedy. It ruled that the Senate’s actions within its sphere cannot be revised or controlled by the judicial department through mandamus. As a co-equal constitutional body, the Senate’s exercise of its duties is beyond the SC’s power of review, except in cases of grave abuse of discretion. However, specifically for this case and in the interest of equity, the SC treated the petition as one for certiorari and proceeded to determine whether the Senate acted unlawfully or abused its discretion when it did not convene immediately as an impeachment court during its session break. Contrary to the petitioner’s claim, the SC found that the Senate acted on the impeachment complaint in a timely manner. While the Constitution requires the House of Representatives to act within a certain number of session days on an impeachment complaint, it does not specify a fixed timeframe for the Senate to start an impeachment trial. It simply provides that the trial “shall forthwith proceed,” leaving the timing to the Senate’s discretion. The SC clarified that the term “forthwith” in Article XI, Section 3(4) of the Constitution means within a reasonable time, which may be longer or shorter, depending on the circumstances of each case. This allows the Senate to make the necessary preparations to convene as an impeachment court. While the Constitution does not set an exact date for the trial, the Senate must avoid undue delay to uphold the principle that public officers must at all times be accountable to the people. The SC considered the petition moot because the Senate had begun impeachment preparations, and the Articles of Impeachment against Vice President Duterte were nullified by the SC’s July 25, 2025 Decision and January 28, 2026 Resolution in Duterte v. House of Representatives. A case is moot when subsequent events remove any issues, making court rulings unnecessary. Since no Articles of Impeachment remained, the SC had no reason to order the Senate to convene as an impeachment court. Read the full text of the Press Briefer at sc.judiciary.gov.ph/?p=164510 The full text of the Decision will be uploaded to the SC website once available. Copying of this content is subject to the SC PIO’s Credit Attribution Policy.

English
9
69
240
22.3K
Paolo Tamase
Paolo Tamase@pstamase·
A written constitution is susceptible to multiple interpretations. But its democratizing potential rests in its ability to embarrass officials: when their reading departs significantly from the common meaning, they give the public reason to doubt if they can interpret correctly.
ABS-CBN News@ABSCBNNews

Supreme Court clarifies that “forthwith” as mentioned in the Constitution in relation to impeachment cases means “within a reasonable time, which may be longer or shorter, depending on the circumstances of each case.” | via @adrianayalin

English
3
38
104
5.3K
Paolo Tamase retweetledi
Pope Leo XIV
Pope Leo XIV@Pontifex·
Absurd and inhuman violence is spreading ferociously through the sacred places of the Christian East, profaned by the blasphemy of war and the brutality of business, with no regard for people’s lives, which are considered at most collateral damage of self-interest. But no gain can be worth the life of the weakest, children, or families. No cause can justify the shedding of innocent blood.
English
3.2K
32.1K
149.5K
3.6M
Paolo Tamase retweetledi
Jervis Manahan
Jervis Manahan@JervisManahan·
People are twisting our reports to fit their false news narratives. The story below is my report so I would not let this pass. Quick fact check: this is an event that happened April 8, 2026. DFA Secretary Theresa Lazaro who is in the photo was appointed only last July 2025.
Jervis Manahan tweet media
English
145
486
2.3K
190.3K
Paolo Tamase
Paolo Tamase@pstamase·
@ohlistic @dumidyeypee I’m more interested in the DILG/PNP’s power to impose the curfew, considering they don’t have general welfare powers and (to my knowledge) their rulemaking on this point would have no statutory anchor.
English
0
2
9
504
Paolo Tamase retweetledi
Pope Leo XIV
Pope Leo XIV@Pontifex·
The cross is part of the mission. The imperialist occupation of the world is disrupted from within; the violence that until now has been the law is unmasked. The poor, imprisoned, and rejected Messiah descends into the darkness of death, yet in so doing He brings a new creation to light. #HolyThursday
English
1K
10.6K
63.6K
5.8M
Paolo Tamase
Paolo Tamase@pstamase·
@WILLfindways @ohlistic Quite obviously, to avoid the suspect? As he’s apparently escaped, to inform authorities if he’s seen? No one is saying the suspect is guilty, but I think people should be allowed to intelligently take precautions.
English
1
0
3
107
WILL Benedict
WILL Benedict@WILLfindways·
@pstamase @ohlistic Why do you need to know the name of the suspect? Are you going to conduct an independent investigation or inquiry in aid of legislation? ☕️☕️☕️
English
2
0
0
347
ohlistic
ohlistic@ohlistic·
Given that the identity of the suspect, apparently a known resident of the condo, is easily determinable, it’s an interesting choice that law enforcement has not publicly released that information.
Eon Sanchez@eon_sanchez

Dalawa ang nasawi at 4 ang sugatan matapos ang pamamaril ng isang lalaki sa basketball court sa loob ng isang condominium compound sa Bgy. Marcelo Green, Parañaque City, Miyerkules ng gabi, March 4, 2026. @ABSCBNNews #SelfiePatrol

English
5
57
429
53.7K
Paolo Tamase retweetledi
pred
pred@fredo_ber·
Philippines: No to abortion! Also Philippines when actual children died: 🤣🤣🤣
English
82
7.7K
34.2K
398.8K
Paolo Tamase
Paolo Tamase@pstamase·
@Themarshal_17 Ah sorry, ‘yung akademiko kasi bukas sa iba’t ibang paliwanag para sa mga naoobserbahan nila. Para sa panatiko, sigurado na ang lahat dahil sila ay nananampalataya.
Filipino
0
0
25
374
Blck Hawk
Blck Hawk@Themarshal_17·
@pstamase Either so may doubt kahit alam mo sa sarili mo na Duterte parin talaga ang sigaw ng masa. From trillanes - drilon - egay. Lahat sinasabi It's one vs Sara or matatalo kayo🙃
Filipino
4
0
1
518
Paolo Tamase
Paolo Tamase@pstamase·
63.1K of 72.2K (87%) are laugh reacts. Either the trolls’ funding has been replenished—or behind the wholesome karaoke videos, million-man religious processions, and signature hospitality, we are a truly evil people deep inside.
Paolo Tamase tweet media
English
17
189
649
25.6K
Blck Hawk
Blck Hawk@Themarshal_17·
@pstamase Keep the delusion that majority of the Filipinos are "troll" even the surveys, fb reactions say otherwise
English
2
0
2
1.3K