Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Purerosel Rafasheen
7.1K posts

Purerosel Rafasheen
@purerosel
26 | 🇫🇷🇷🇪 | Speaks 🇬🇧🇪🇦🇯🇵
Katılım Ekim 2021
77 Takip Edilen37 Takipçiler

@khaeles @AGallagherAlly A "job" is, again, an intent. I will not stop pointing out the teleological fallacy.
Trans women are not "men in dresses". You would know as much if you spoke to trans people, which I encourage.
English

@purerosel @AGallagherAlly A man who has a low sperm count or is sterile does not cease to be a man. He was born with the proper equipment to do the job, It's just defective. And honestly , I think it's kind of insulting to equate an infertile woman to a man in a dress.
English

Transphobes - making infertile c/s women feel like shit, all under the guise of pRoTeCtInG wOmEn...
Sarah Fields@SarahisCensored
For Trans day of Visibility I just want to remind “Trans women” that they cannot do this. And they never will. Because they’re not women.
English

@khaeles @AGallagherAlly The opposite of intent is not coincidence. Yes, sexes did evolve to fulfill reproductive functions ; but sexes are categories, not an individual. If an individual is born without those sexual functions, they were not "intended" to have them.
English

@purerosel @AGallagherAlly Ovaries are coincidental now? And tes, sexes evolved specifically to fulfill the necessary roles of reproduction. Biological men are born with specific gamydes specifically designed to fertilize, Biological women are born with gamydes oriented to bearing children.
English

@Pricel1411 @magicspeedwagon Les linguistes, certes, mais Zamenhof était ophtalmologue, et l'européen moyen ne voyait le monde que par le prisme colonial. Mais je suis d'accord, l'espéranto n'a rien d'universel, c'est une évidence.
Français

@purerosel @magicspeedwagon Pour le coup début 20ième on a une assez bonne idée de la diversité linguistique du monde
C'est surtout qu'il a créé l'espéranto dans un contexte colonial sur-dominé par le monde euro-occidental, c'est pas un mal en soit mais du coup ça fait que sa langue est peu "universelle"
Français

> "langue universelle"
> look inside
> langue qui utilise l'alphabet latin et se base sur les langues indo-européennes

Abasourdie@hvmzv33
@ekleralavanille @212zooo Il y en a une c’est l’espéranto
Français

@WilliamWhi2423 @AGallagherAlly You can just close the conversation if you want. It doesn't change the points I've brought up.
English

@IgnoredJester @AGallagherAlly Most men can't have children because they lack the physical makeup allowing them to do so.
Where you moved the goalposts was in saying that even if a trans woman was to gain the ability to bear children, she still wouldn't be a woman. That contradicts the rest of your points.
English

@purerosel @AGallagherAlly Yes. Because men can’t have children. Because they’re men. I never moved the goal post when I said this from the very beginning. What? You know what? 2+2=5. Sure. Whatever, man.
English

@MaryMusubi @AGallagherAlly "News" ?
You didn't address my point.
English

@purerosel @AGallagherAlly We realize this isn't the news you want to hear
but it is reality
You living in denial is not anyone else's issue to deal with
English

@IgnoredJester @AGallagherAlly "Meant to" is just another assertion of intent.
And now, you've moved the goalposts.
You contend that even if trans women could bear children, they still wouldn't be women ;
Yet you propped childbearing as the separating criterion between them.
English

@purerosel @AGallagherAlly If men were meant to have kids by birthing them, they would have already. A trans woman is a man. That’s just how it is. Not even to be cruel. It just is that way. And no amount of science, I’m sorry, or womb transplants can fix that.
English

@WilliamWhi2423 @AGallagherAlly "Supposed" also implies an ought — therefore intent.
English

@purerosel @AGallagherAlly I said 'fluke of nature' because women are supposed to be able to carry babies, but if they are unable to, it's a fluke of nature. Maybe it was the wrong saying in this instance, but you know what I mean.
English

@IgnoredJester @AGallagherAlly As *would* a trans woman with the ability to have a child — say, had she been born with it, or if medical science one day allows it.
Both are equally deprived of that ability.
By claiming something is "by nature" exclusive, you are simply assuming intent in nature.
English

@purerosel @AGallagherAlly Because that said woman *would* have had the ability to have a child if not for whatever medical or what have you reason. Men will never be able to experience what is already by nature exclusive.
English
Purerosel Rafasheen retweetledi
Purerosel Rafasheen retweetledi

@katyahina_417 Then again,
We *were*, for the most part, children and adolescents.
The nuance of this scene couldn't help but be lost on many, especially given the time period, in which the "yandere" trope (not its proper definition, but the popular "crazy smile with knife") was so popular.
English
Purerosel Rafasheen retweetledi
Purerosel Rafasheen retweetledi
Purerosel Rafasheen retweetledi
Purerosel Rafasheen retweetledi

A lot of people on the right would actually be super happy to spend a lot more money per person on welfare if part of the deal was people on welfare suffered more as a result.
Christopher Wipper@SGTWipper1Each
This should be standard issue for Food Stamps. If it's good enough for the Troops, it's good enough for civilians.
English
Purerosel Rafasheen retweetledi
Purerosel Rafasheen retweetledi

@RebelWorship35 @WilliamWhi2423 @AGallagherAlly I never used the word "design", rather "intent". The former can be extended to the tinkering of natural selection ; the latter cannot. And only the latter makes sense in the context of a "fluke".
English

@purerosel @WilliamWhi2423 @AGallagherAlly Can you even justify this lol? All evidence points to indifferent design, which is at the end of the day still design.
English















