Peter Pyt retweetledi
🚨🇺🇦REALITY CHECK: Don't listen to Zelensky, Ukraine isn't becoming a missile power
Zelensky has released another propaganda video claiming Ukraine is building powerful long-range missiles that will change everything. Only problem? He's been making this same pitch for two years straight. So far, Ukrainian missiles have not performed as advertised.
Here is Ukraine's track record:
🔸 PALIANYTSIA (2024) – Missile-drone hybrid. Zelensky claimed successful combat use and mass production. The Palianytsia has a warhead too small (100 kg or less) to destroy hardened targets, faces production delays due to component shortages and a $1 million unit cost. Confirmed deep strikes by April 2026: ZERO.
🔸 LONG NEPTUNE (2025) – Upgraded cruise missile with 1,000 km range. Flying at subsonic speed with a large radar cross-section, the Long Neptune is highly interceptable by Russian air defense. Compounding this, its anti-ship radar performs poorly over land. Announced mass production. Confirmed strikes: only a few dozen.
🔸 SAPSAN (2025) – Mach 5+ ballistic missile, called an "Iskander-killer." Declared "80% ready" in 2021, the Sapsan still shows no mass production or confirmed combat use by April 2026, with sources discussing a possible program freeze. The Sapsan also has inferior guidance (30-70m CEP), only ~300 km range (vs. 480 km design), and lacks Iskander-M's terminal evasion.
🔸 FLAMINGO FP-5 (2025) – Made by a former garden planter company. Claimed 1,000-3,000 km range. Zelensky called it "the most successful missile." Actual strikes: only about 30. The missile is slow (650-900 km/h) and an easy target for Russian air defenses. Also, Ukraine's anti-corruption agency is investigating the manufacturer for alleged "superprofits" and misleading the government.
Will the West keep buying Zelensky's 2026 missile miracle, or is the big-talk/small-delivery pattern finally too obvious to ignore?
English
