巴图鲁 🔶 E/acc

year of yellow fruit 从这个小编发币被抓开始 散户亏完觉醒，拒绝再次充值，枯竭行情 就只剩下园区量化互P了 0x2fe3731d8b61515aad65757c7cab8042c43a4444

0x887ee6d7cba3d342530d5defbeb13a7409d34444 管住手，1.5万市值内买入10-20块钱，也许10块都会被他们拿去，但是没办法，总要有点梦想，bsc类似a股，量化绞肉场。

After some training, my AI version has been able to take over my daily work, doing it more accurately and efficiently than I can. Starting today, my routine tasks will be handled by AI. If my account suddenly starts running wild, it might just be my AI self.🫣 经过一段时间训练，我的AI分身已经可以替代我的日常工作，而且比我更为精准高效，今天起我的日常工作将由AI接管，如果我的账号突然放飞自我，那可能是常态。🫣

Saw some people panicking or asking about quantum computing's impact on crypto. At a high level, all crypto has to do is to upgrade to Quantum-Resistant (Post-Quantum) Algorithms. So, no need to panic. 😂 In practice, there are some execution considerations. It's hard to organize upgrades in a decentralized world. There will likely be many debates on which algorithm(s) to use, resulting in some forks. And some dead project may not upgrade at all. Might be a good to cleanse out those projects anyway. New code may introduce other bugs or security issues in the short term. People who self custody will have to migrate their coins to new wallets. This brings to the question of Satoshi's bitcoins. If those coins move, then it means he/she is still around, which is interesting to know. If they don't move (in a certain period of time), it might be better to lock (or effectively burn) those addresses so that they don't go to the first hacker who cracks it. There is also the difficulty of identifying all his addresses, and not confuse with some old hodlers. Anyway, it's a different topic for later. Fundamentally: It's always easier to encrypt than decrypt. More computing power is always good. Crypto will stay, post quantum.