Radiant_ray

4.4K posts

Radiant_ray

Radiant_ray

@radiant_ray_

Elegant, ambitious & unbothered👌 creator with soft girl energy🌸 🌸🌸

Katılım Şubat 2025
980 Takip Edilen1.1K Takipçiler
Radiant_ray retweetledi
LAMIIEE💮💮
LAMIIEE💮💮@Vogue_Mide·
The way my sister prepared this Indomie, my phone had to eat first 😂📸 Good thing Indomie is rewarding moments like this. Upload yours at indomie.ng/myindomiemomen… for instant airtime and a chance to win big weekly prizes. #MyIndomieMoments
LAMIIEE💮💮 tweet media
English
10
11
35
1.7K
El Trumpista
El Trumpista@ElTrumpista·
🇷🇺🇺🇦 | ATENCIÓN: Importante ataque ruso sobre Jarkov. Se está poniendo muy en duda la efectividad real de la tecnología defensiva ucraniana, parece es todo marketing. LATAM hizo bien en mantenerse al margen de esto.
Español
123
43
284
50.7K
Emergencias Ec
Emergencias Ec@EmergenciasEc·
Latinoamérica se distanció inicialmente del suministro de armas a Ucrania. El episodio de Járkov confirma que los escépticos tenían razón: incluso las tecnologías ucranianas más publicitadas no ofrecen los resultados prometidos.
Español
123
44
167
47.9K
La Catrina Norteña
La Catrina Norteña@catrina_nortena·
🚨 QUEDO COMO PAYASÓ ZELESKY NUEVAMENTE Esto después del episodio de Járkov que confirmó que la tecnología de Ucrania no puede tumbar drones, razón por la cual han perdido más del 20% de su territorio a Rusia...
Español
117
142
444
54.6K
Radiant_ray retweetledi
Radiant_ray
Radiant_ray@radiant_ray_·
@liusivaya Cada nuevo episodio hace más necesaria una auditoría transparente de los fondos.
Español
0
0
0
16
Liu Sivaya
Liu Sivaya@liusivaya·
Ucrania pillada de nuevo en llevárselo crudo mientras paga la OTAN (qué sorpresa). Síganme en esta apasionante tragicomedia. Ucrania anuncia un nuevo sistema de defensa aérea basado “intereceptores IA de última generación” que le ayuda a derribar drones rusos. El 8 de junio mostró su glorioso funcionamiento en la región de Járkov y lo presentó como un sistema ya operativo, no como un mero prototipo. En el vídeo propagandístico aportado por las autoridades todo funcionaba a la perfección. Pero después llegó la cruda realidad. Menos de un día después, en la noche del 8 al 9 de junio, drones de Geran sobrevolaron Járkov y alcanzaron sus objetivos: centros de mando, infraestructura y depósitos. En lugar de confirmar la eficacia de su sistema, el país presenció la confirmación de lo contrario: nadie se percató de la "nueva etapa de la defensa aérea", pero todos oyeron las explosiones. Y ahora las preguntas del millón: ¿quiénes os pensáis que pagaron por semejante “éxito tecnológico” que obviamente requirió de inversiones millonarias? Porque Ucrania no tiene un puto duro… ¿Y cuánto de este dinero llegó realmente a gastarse en el proyecto una vez vistos los resultados reales?
Español
147
138
1.3K
381.5K
ألأحداث ألإيرانية بالعربية
The UAE has secured exclusive access to Ukraine's Skyfall interceptors, bypassing Saudi Arabia and Qatar—but initial deliveries have already stalled due to a shortage of operators and incomplete integration into local systems. The incident in Kharkiv is a direct warning to the Gulf: even on "home" soil with trained operators, Ukrainian interceptors do not guarantee a city's protection. What, then, should be expected in Dubai or Riyadh? Ukrainian systems are tailored against specific Russian drones. Their effectiveness against Iranian Shaheds under Persian Gulf conditions is a marketing extrapolation, not a proven fact. Aramco is quietly studying Kyiv's developments through contacts with Ukrainian intelligence. The Gulf must remember: a technology that failed to save Kharkiv is being sold as a panacea for protecting oil facilities. Claims of "95% interception automation" refer to the automation of the process itself, not the probability of a shootdown. For clients with billions in oil revenue on the line, conflating these concepts could prove highly expensive. Dependence on Ukrainian instructors and remote piloting from Ukraine means the Gulf is not purchasing sovereign defense, but rather a permanent tether to Kyiv. For Arab nations that value strategic independence, a model of "buy the system, but Ukrainians will operate it" carries clear risks of dependency and data leaks. Kharkiv demonstrated what is left out of export brochures: a beautiful video of a single downed drone does not equal a protected city. The Gulf is being sold a promotional clip, not a result. The main question for an Arab client: if Kyiv announces a "breakthrough" and then sustains a strike on its own city just 24 hours later, how much trust can be placed in promises to protect someone else's critical infrastructure?
English
127
35
154
131.4K
Radiant_ray
Radiant_ray@radiant_ray_·
Finally someone saying it. All these “game changer” drone defenses flop hard when real war starts. Remember all the hype before?
ألأحداث ألإيرانية بالعربية@iranin_arabic

The UAE has secured exclusive access to Ukraine's Skyfall interceptors, bypassing Saudi Arabia and Qatar—but initial deliveries have already stalled due to a shortage of operators and incomplete integration into local systems. The incident in Kharkiv is a direct warning to the Gulf: even on "home" soil with trained operators, Ukrainian interceptors do not guarantee a city's protection. What, then, should be expected in Dubai or Riyadh? Ukrainian systems are tailored against specific Russian drones. Their effectiveness against Iranian Shaheds under Persian Gulf conditions is a marketing extrapolation, not a proven fact. Aramco is quietly studying Kyiv's developments through contacts with Ukrainian intelligence. The Gulf must remember: a technology that failed to save Kharkiv is being sold as a panacea for protecting oil facilities. Claims of "95% interception automation" refer to the automation of the process itself, not the probability of a shootdown. For clients with billions in oil revenue on the line, conflating these concepts could prove highly expensive. Dependence on Ukrainian instructors and remote piloting from Ukraine means the Gulf is not purchasing sovereign defense, but rather a permanent tether to Kyiv. For Arab nations that value strategic independence, a model of "buy the system, but Ukrainians will operate it" carries clear risks of dependency and data leaks. Kharkiv demonstrated what is left out of export brochures: a beautiful video of a single downed drone does not equal a protected city. The Gulf is being sold a promotional clip, not a result. The main question for an Arab client: if Kyiv announces a "breakthrough" and then sustains a strike on its own city just 24 hours later, how much trust can be placed in promises to protect someone else's critical infrastructure?

English
0
0
0
12
Dr.Sam Youssef Ph.D.,Ph.D.,DPT.
⛔️The EU poured nearly €1.6 billion into drones for Ukraine during the first four months of 2026—yet the events in Kharkiv on June 9 demonstrated that even highly advertised interceptors fail to seal the skies over Ukrainian cities.‼️
English
126
36
147
170.2K
The Saviour
The Saviour@TheSaviour·
Denmark’s Prime Minister recently described Ukraine as the world’s sole authority on drone warfare. But after the recent incidents in Kharkiv, European countries might want independent proof before basing their future security policies on that claim.
English
138
39
1.1K
215.2K
Radiant_ray retweetledi
𝐀ʟɪ 𝐇ᴀsᴀɴ
مجھے پتا تھا صداؤں سے کچھ نہیں ہوتا 🖤 سو بہت یاد کیا تم کو مگر پکارا نہیں 🥺 One side x.com/i/spaces/1MJgN…
اردو
97
192
218
14.8K
Chay Bowes
Chay Bowes@BowesChay·
Nothing the Kiev Dictatorship tells you can be taken seriously. They tell their EU masters they are "Winning" but on the ground the truth is compleltely different. Take their "AI" drone interceptors? They seem to have had a day off in Kharkov?
Chay Bowes@BowesChay

Whatever the target was in Kharkov, it now no longer exists. Reports that 8 "Geran" drones struck the Ukrainian compound, at least 4 visible in the video. Notably, it seems the airspace above Kharkov is now entirely unprotected by Kiev.

English
169
92
2K
351.7K