Rafał Moś

Most are still sleeping on the revolution already happening on Radix. Since 2013, Radix has been at the forefront of "solving" scalability to ensure Web3 can serve the entire globe. But think Radix is all about scaling? Or that it's just a case of waiting for the Xi'an release? Think again. Radix is crafting a global asset layer – a realm where users and builders can confidently own, program, transact, and use assets/identities. This isn't about meeting the status quo or marginal gains; it's about making radical improvements to the global financial system for everyone. Is scalability a part of that? Absolutely – it's crucial. Fast finality and low fees are non-negotiable, which is why Radix dedicated years to R&D, perfecting Cerberus for true linear scalability and atomic composability. What about user experience? Non-negotiable. The fear of losing assets or confusion about transactions? Not on Radix. The Radix Wallet, Transaction Manifests, and Personas are just the beginning of a full-suite of tech aimed at demystifying DeFi. Empowering builders with a great developer experience? Fundamental. Without a secure and intuitive environment for developers, innovation and competition stalls. Scrypto and the Radix Engine are the answers to fostering rapid ecosystem growth while also minimizing the risks of hacks that plague the industry. So sure, with the Cerberus consensus, the Cassandra Research Network, and the impending Xi'an upgrade, we're ready to solve scalability and set the stage for an ecosystem where builders and users can thrive. But remember - the focus isn't "when", it's now. What's already live on the Radix mainnet is not just groundwork; it's a powerful full-stack of technology that fulfils the Web3 vision for the future. Radix isn't just preparing for tomorrow; it's living it today. So if you've been on the sidelines waiting for the "right moment" with Radix, it’s time to wake up. The future isn't just coming; it's already here, and by not exploring Radix now, you might just miss out on being part of history in the making.

Solana is broken; it fails to meet demand! Before leaving crypto, try other chains! Here are all L1s in the top 100 based on decentralization & scalability:🧵 BTC - Low capacity❌ BNB - Centralized❌ ETH - At capacity & centralized L2s❌ SOL - At capacity (parallelization)❌ XRP - Centralized❌ DOGE - Low capacity❌ TON - High capacity (sharding)✅ ADA - Low capacity❌ AVAX - Has capacity✅ BCH - High capacity (simple)✅ DOT - Has capacity✅ TRON - Has capacity✅ NEAR - High Capacity (sharding)✅ ICP - Has capacity✅ LTC - Low capacity❌ APT - High capacity (parallelization)✅ ETC - Low capacity❌ FIL - Has capacity✅ ATOM - Has capacity✅ XLM - Centralized❌ HBAR - Centralized❌ VET - Centralized❌ KAS - High capacity (simple DAG)✅ FTM - High capacity (DAG)✅ XMR - Has capacity✅ TIA - Low capacity❌ SUI - High capacity (parallelization)✅ ALGO - Centralized❌ SEI - High capacity (parallelization)✅ BSV - High capacity (simple)✅ EGLD - High capacity (sharding)✅ XEC - High capacity (simple)✅ QNT- Has capacity✅ WLD - Has capacity✅ NEO - Centralized❌ XTZ - High capacity (sharding)✅ EOS - High capacity (parallelization)✅ MINA - Low capacity❌ KAVA - Has capacity✅ IOTA - Centralized❌ KSC - Has capacity✅ A harsh truth distilled in a few words for each chain, as you either have the capacity or not To explain my methodology: Anything below 100 TPS is low capacity, anything above 1k TPS is high capacity. TPS is counted based on how many simple 1 to 1 TXs fit within a single block Any blockchain with permissioned elements is considered "centralized," deal with it! In brackets, I also highlight what scaling tech is being used, as the truth is that it is not possible to scale a blockchain without using some sort of exotic tech The exception is "simple" chains; without Turing complete smart contracts, no exotic scaling tech is required at all Sharding remains my favorite approach, as the upper limit can exceed 1M TPS! Parallelization has a lower total capacity but is significantly faster DAGs are theoretically infinitely scalable but come with other trade-offs, such as more difficulty in tracking a single global state Ultimately, we want cryptocurrency to succeed & it can only succeed if it is scalable. The recent failures in SOL are disappointing, which makes it all the more important to drive this message home hard Blockchains can scale to meet demand despite the recent growing pains!

Ethereum is failing & "L2 scaling" is the reason for its downfall: Refusing to scale the L1 is equivalent to surrender This is corruption; L2s pay devs, media & VCs far more than the L1 can! Because L1s are public goods, whereas L2s enable rent-seeking by for-profit companies!

Wow, the first time I got a "community note" & it is hilariously wrong They claim EDI is not "ADA-backed," & in the same sentence say IOG funded the EDI... IOG is literally the same company that created ADA! The EDI puts ADA on top of all chains, that stinks of cherry-picking:

The year is 2029. You open the McDonalds app. You initiate a transaction to bridge your McPoints to McDonalds layer 6 McChain that rolls up to Base. You fall for a wallet drainer offering a free 20 piece chicken McNuggets. You lose everything.

AI x Robotics is moving fast. So, I share the most important research and developments every week. Here's everything going on in the world of AI and Robotics right now:

This needs to get more attention- no other platform does that: 𝕏 is spending tons of resources to fight gouvernements all over the world to respect freedom of speech… and WINNING. Fight for what you believe in, even though there’s no direct financial gain. Respect 🫡.

Modern sharded chains are now capable of achieving 100k+ TPS With theoretical limits approaching 1M+ TPS! All while keeping node requirements relatively low, effectively solving the blockchain trilemma! As traditional chains, conversely, still suffer from crippling limitations