rah

48 posts

rah

rah

@rah_ds

Mass spectrometry, proteomics, machine learning, multi-omics

Germany Katılım Mayıs 2023
112 Takip Edilen6 Takipçiler
rah
rah@rah_ds·
@KrishnaswamyLab great offer! Thanks for the opportunity. May I ask if there will be a similar Workshop at a different date? Cheers
English
0
0
0
11
Krishnaswamy Lab
Krishnaswamy Lab@KrishnaswamyLab·
Workshop: Cancer Cell State Trajectories & Heterogeneity Across Space and Time Cancer cells don’t stay the same—they evolve across tissues & time, adapting to therapy and the microenvironment. But how do we uncover these hidden journeys from noisy, sparse single-cell data? Join us to learn machine learning tools for single cell ata from @KrishnaswamyLab PHATE, MIOFlow and RiTINI and more—combined with biological insights from @c_chaffer, Prof Peter Croucher, Dr John Lock and Prof Kris Killian on cancer cell plasticity, dormancy and metastasis. 🔬 Define cell state transitions in cancer progression 🧬 Decode complex single-cell data across space and time 💡 Discover new ways to target cancer vulnerabilities 📍  August 19-21, 11am-2pm AEST | 🖥️ Zoom Register here: #CancerBiology" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAI… hashtag#SingleCell hashtag#MachineLearning hashtag#CancerResearch hashtag#Bioinformatics hashtag#TrajectoryAnalysis hashtag#CancerPlasticity
English
4
10
44
5.8K
rah
rah@rah_ds·
@ItaiYanai even nowadays in many places/labs technical/research assistants often get only into the paper's acknowledgement . Seems to very much depend on the PI's "philosophy".
English
0
0
0
143
Itai Yanai
Itai Yanai@ItaiYanai·
I'd love to know the backstory on why Elizabeth Roberts is not a full author here.
Itai Yanai tweet media
English
5
1
23
6.8K
Soledad Galli
Soledad Galli@Soledad_Galli·
I found 12 Python libraries for #machineLearning Interpretability while crafting my course: ▶️ Scikit-learn ▶️ treeinterpreter ▶️ ELI5 ▶️ Dalex ▶️ ALIBI explain ▶️ interpretML ▶️ OmniXAI ▶️ scikit-explain ▶️ pdpbox ▶️ pyAle ▶️ LIME ▶️ Shap But none met my expectations.🙄
English
1
0
4
188
rah
rah@rah_ds·
@tangming2005 thanks for the post. I am stressing this point a lot from an experimental design point of view. Could you give some examples, please?
English
1
0
0
15
Ming "Tommy" Tang
Ming "Tommy" Tang@tangming2005·
You need positive and negative controls for your data analysis
English
1
0
13
3.3K
SCIEX
SCIEX@SCIEXnews·
Which feature of the new ZenoTOF 7600+ system are you most pumped 💪 about??
SCIEX tweet media
English
3
0
4
4.4K
rah retweetledi
Itai Yanai
Itai Yanai@ItaiYanai·
The single greatest misunderstanding about science by the public is that scientists solve problems; in reality, scientists are primarily concerned with creating them.
Itai Yanai tweet media
English
21
335
1.9K
179.1K
Sam Payne
Sam Payne@byu_sam·
@AJ_Brenes A hundred sounds like a good start to give us an idea of biological variation for a single sample type. GTEx proteomics only does in the tens of samples, like 30 if I remember right.
English
3
0
1
204
Sam Payne
Sam Payne@byu_sam·
#TeamMassSpec - what are people's favorite population scale proteomcis datasets? I'm a big fan of CPTAC, but what others do people use?
English
1
0
2
487
rah
rah@rah_ds·
Learn ML engineering in 4 months in a free online course by @Al_Grigor from @DataTalksClub - Linear and logistic regression - Tree-based models - Neural networks - Deployment with AWS, Serverless, Kubernetes Register here: ctt.ec/YytdK+
English
1
0
0
22
rah
rah@rah_ds·
@lpachter Interesting (actually worrying), that even prominent names in the (computational) single-cell field produce such output. Where does this actually have its roots? Seems to self-propagate #bioinformatics #SingleCell
English
0
0
0
1.9K
Lior Pachter
Lior Pachter@lpachter·
In this UMAP, there are arrows linking nothing to nothing (see panel d). Gornisht mit gornisht, as they say. Also drawing curves on top of a UMAP built from x-ray images by repurposing RNA velocity software that already didn't make sense is next level!
Lior Pachter tweet media
English
5
6
54
93.8K
rah
rah@rah_ds·
@UCDProteomics yes, absolutely agreed. Unfortunately, to me it seems that replication is not sth most people aim for when publishing (not just in methods papers). I constantly wonder how this is reflected in any biological conclusions made #proteomics #TeamMassSpec #Bioinformatics
English
0
0
0
112
Brett Phinney
Brett Phinney@UCDProteomics·
I wish journals would require methods papers be reproducible by at least 3 labs before it can be published . Think of all the time and resources this would save !
English
2
2
21
1.3K