Raiden 0XDEFCAFE

Binance is doing a rehearsal of a bullrun for #Bitcoin #BTC

@0xLawliette The funny thing is that “43-44 thousand have been reached.” Like this was always part of the plan

If Bitcoin hits ATH or higher and then goes to 20k, will you still say that your prediction was precise? How much gains on gold were wiped out recently? BTC already did 2.5x+ from the previous low. It can go higher or lower from now on. It's a market cycle, people have earned and lost on it since the trading markets were born.

@Ashcryptoreal This is fine when they are properly used in extremely high-leveraged ultra degen small-cap trading.

I just made $2.5M in $BTC , ETH and $SOL but I still live like this. Is this okay ?

Comparison of #Arbitrum's TVL with its nearest competitors - #SOL, #AVAX, #MATIC, and #Optimism. #ARB market cap currently sits at 1/21th of Solana's valuation, 1/9th of Avalanche's, and 1/6th of Polygon's with TVL more than double that of other chains. Only a matter of time before Arbitrum gets the adoption that it deserves. Not included #ADA cause its TVL is so small that is neglectable in comparison.

What's next for #BTC following the #BitcoinETF? The real game-changer will be when countries begin systematically incorporating BTC into their reserves. That's when the true party will start.

Exciting news! Our trading volume's moving average is showing a consistent upward trend. We're curious – how much more will it soar after our product rework is done? 👀

@Ashcryptoreal When it reaches 38k don't screenshot the chart until 42k at least. It'll definitely help based on the history of your previous tweets 😅

@WatcherGuru Watcher Guru news line looks like some intern opened a high-leveraged short recently.

JUST IN: Changpeng Zhao (CZ) resigns as Chairman of #Binance US.

DOJ conference on Binance and CZ in short: "They support terrorism, child abuse, drugs, and all bad things imaginable, that's why we decided to settle this with money, sending a message to all BANANSES of the world that these rules apply equally for them." What a joke.

@udiWertheimer Except you forgot to mention a couple of things. L2's means scalability and inclusivity for mass adoption. And you need an ETH to operate on them.

L2 thesis on ethereum makes very little sense to me defi loses liquidity network effects nfts lose provenance network effects lose-lose situation what were they thinking

"Problematic aggregator swaps" - this is implying that it was not your fault. Can we have the list of these swaps @TeamUnibot? $unibot #unibot

Nothing to add about the #unibot hack. $unibot

True. They are trying to get some short-term volume, listing every trash that has market-making. People see it, get burned, and don't take it seriously anymore the next time they see another one. So these exchanges end up competing with each other on 5-10 main pairs, mostly on BTC which is the direct opposite of what it should be. Imagine if they cared about their listings. The picture would be totally different.

@raidendefcafe Exchanges are now like listing on coinmarketcap back in the days XD Soon they won't be relavant anymore.

Safereum is not just a multimillion-dollar rug. It's about what exactly is wrong with DeFi space, and how big-name exchanges legitimized a questionable project. 'DYOR, GL next time, fren', 'I knew it was coming, all the red flags were there', right? It's not so clear. A project less than 2 weeks old, whose marketing narrative is all around the mystery of the team behind it, their crypto connection network, and the size of their marketing funds, was undeniably legitimized by chain listings in big-name T1-T2 exchanges like @MEXC_Official , @Poloniex , @gate_io , @Bybit_Official , @LBank_Exchange, and others. Some of them even purchased liquidity from the open market. Most listed for free. This was everything the team needed to give their fraud wings; it was their only bet. And those with exclusive influence in this space handed it to them without the slightest doubt. This was enough to overcome all the red flags they had. 'Tier 1 CEXes can't be wrong; at least, they vetted their documents before making a deal', right? Right? Formal listing criteria contain many rules, focusing mostly on a 'proven team', 'useful product', and other bureaucratic stuff. But in reality, there's only one rule: the volume of market-making. This should change, and those who wield the most influence in crypto should use their power to improve the space, protect customers, and ensure that the rules and criteria are enforced as written, rather than empowering crooks. You should give your users the opportunity to invest and profit, not just the chance to boost your short-term volume. This is the reason your criteria should exist, with a user-first mindset. There are plenty of honest teams in the space that meet your formal criteria, but honestly, what are the odds that you'll respond if they knock on your door? - @0xDEFCAFE , @blockblendIO , @copycatdao , @InfinityBit_io , @Roburnaofficial , @BAPT_Labs and many others. Feel free to contact and prove me wrong. You are the ones who can make a difference and influence people's decisions. DeFi can be better, and people deserve it. #Safereum @binance #DeFi

@Imperator_0x What about photosynthesis?

@a00310185 @0xDEFCAFE @whale_hunter_ @MaestroBots @bananagun This is what I call good “simple division” skills. Same quality of work on data as on the router. It surely will not get hacked. Oh wait…

@raidendefcafe @0xDEFCAFE @whale_hunter_ @MaestroBots @bananagun Since you seemingly can't do the division yourself, here's the stat from the dashboard. Just drop it lmao

DEX Bot Wars just got a lot more exciting! 🤖 @MaestroBots is now tracked 🔥 As a major player in terms of users & volume, this should give us a clearer picture of the overall market. The dashboard now features 12 projects, more coming soon! 👇 dune.com/whale_hunter/d…