Adani will make pvc .. notes are made of PP,
Shikha Pruthi Gupta✨@justnottamomma
Hail Adani 🙌🏻!!!! Long kar le ?
English
Raj_Lachhi IRS
12.4K posts
Raj_Lachhi IRS
@raj_irs
Chief Commissioner of Income Tax (Retd)..Views are personal. Retweets are not endorsement.
Katılım Haziran 2019
1.8K Takip Edilen422 Takipçiler
Public sectors should stop having arbitration clause or limit the arbitration to issues of 19-20 crores only .. otherwise they will keep bleeding in thousands of crores as most players in the arbitration, play for one side only ..
Bar and Bench@barandbench
Arbitration Act needs fundamental relook to address public sector concerns: AG R Venkataramani Read here: barandbench.com/news/law-polic…
English
Issue is not number of seats .. it is fairness in conducting the exam .. Korea is a small country but their intake in medical colleges is v low that requires parents to make their wards study hard from v beginning .. we hv enough number of seats if they can produce good docs..
sandip sabharwal@sandipsabharwal
While Exam reforms are fine Please understand If the supply is of 136000 seats and Demand is of 2300000 seats 21 Lakh plus students are going to get disappointed in any case. Any amount of exam simplification is not going to solve this. Focus should be two fold 1. Try and increase intake. However this can only be incremental 2. Encourage alternative fields of studies and focus on creating employment opportunities there.
English
also does acrobatics with law n earlier binding decisions to achieve what ever they want to hold in a particular case..
English
V difficult decision to digest ..logic is v tenuous n doesn’t inspire confidence .. reasons supplied have to be meaningful n with application of mind n not some arbitrary,off the cuff, cyclostyled reasons.. its a question of legal principle, which can be raised at any time .. SC
CiteCase 🇮🇳@CiteCase
Will Non-Furnishing Of Adequate Reasons Of Arrest By Itself Vitiate Arrest? #SupremeCourt answers here:
English
But why was bail given to M3M owners in PMLA case? They applied it retrospectively which was disputed by the Hon Bela Trivedi in a subsequent decision wherein she held that if at all that decision could apply, it will apply prospectively .. now sc has reconfirmed it..
CiteCase 🇮🇳@CiteCase
Mandatory serving of grounds of arrest was introduced as Judge made law, says #SupremeCourt ! That is why is applies only from the date of the said judgment !
English
let me tell you- most of these funds get siphoned off .. I don't see any material benefits passing on to SC/ST through these funds. in any case, there is reservation n quota in every scheme of the government.
Mohit@Warlock_mohit
We failed as a country 💔
English
pay the least tax.. its unfair..so if LTCG pays 12.5 %, STCG guys shud pay 10% or even lesser.. government should incentivise the STCG so that STT revenue is higher..@nsitharaman,@PMOIndia
English
in fact, it should be just the opposite- STCG guys should pay least tax as they rotate their funds more than the LTCG; as a result, STT revenue from STCG guys is much more.. where as in LTCG, many are promoters who are selling, who hardly pay any STT or max one time STT, n they
Fundamental Investor ™ 🇮🇳@FI_InvestIndia
Dear FM Madam @nsitharaman ji, I have said it before. And I'll say it again. Loud & Clear. LTCG of 12.5% on Equities is one of the Lowest in the World. But there are a few issues: 1. LTCG was ZERO from 2004 to 2018. STT was introduced to offset the Loss in Revenue. It incentivised long term Investors to Hold on Patiently and enjoy Long Term Returns. I believe that Step was something Golden and rewards Long Term Thinking. FM Madam should reconsider this. Keep STT. Abolish LTCG. 2. STT is already taken for every transaction. This is a tax. Again putting Capital Gain, especially on Long Term Gains is not Ok. This is my Opinion. STT is borne by the investor irrespective of Profit or Loss. 3. We are not against Paying Taxes. In fact, we all Pay Income Tax, Capital Gains Tax, GST, Excise, VAT, Tax on Dividends and what not. The problem is the Freebies which are Distributed during the Elections. This is not at all ok. We don't want a single rupee of our Capital Gains to be used for Freebies. Please. I humbly request the FM Madam to Abolish LTCG on Equities. Make the Long Term Period 24 months instead of 12 months. You will see Patient Capital 👍 For Indian Investors like me, the Pain is lesser. We will continue to Create Wealth. But what about our FII brothers & sisters. They also deserve to get minimum returns in Dollar Terms. I feel for the FIIs who have suffered due to declining Rupee and they still have to pay LTCG on Rupee Terms. Something the FM Madam and team should revisit. I think that it is a good time to implement this. FII no longer control our markets. Domestic Funds are consistent and plenty. If FIIs leave, let them Leave with Head Held High. That is our Responsibility. India Structually is Brilliant. Let's make it Tax Friendly as well. Patient Capital will Flow More & Stay, if these Steps are Taken. A Proud Indian Investor, #FI
English
routed lots of money to these funds without paying any taxes n made portfolio of 50/100 crores
English
taxfree contribution by employer to all schemes (PF, NPS, and superannuation) is limited to 7.5 lakhs annually ..n then limit to the tax free interest earned on PF account... it was a good provision .. in fact , it should have been brought in much earlier as high grade employees
Sundara Rajan@sundarmail
An example of @FinMinIndia Babugiri on PF: If an employer contributes for PF, tax free employee contribution is limited to 2.5 lakhs PA. A GOI employee could contribute upto Rs 5 lakhs PA tax free, as there is no employer PF. Earlier there was no limit. @nsitharaman
English
it is for the civil group to bring it to the court n fight it legally...if u recall reservation for marathas in mahrasatra keeps getting knocked down by courts..
English
not really.. religion based reservation gets merged in OBC quota.. reservation above 50% can be challenged n most of the time SC/HCs have annulled such law.. BJP is also a political party n it will keep its constituents happy by bringing in law to enlarge the scope of reservation
Adv Deepika Sharma@DeepikaSharmaa_
Does he know that in many BJP ruled states reservation has already been taken close to 80%? Matlab ab inhe 50% ki limit se dikkat nahi. These people keep shifting the goal post for BJP. Also BJP is considering reservation based on religion too and in fact, many Christian and Muslim castes do get reservations even today. BJP’s Ministers have openly supported reservation in Private Sector. So shut up!
English
so far as such special provisions relate to their admission to educational institutions including private educational institutions, whether aided or unaided by the State, other than the minority educational institutions referred to in clause (1) of article 30.
English
5)Nothing in this article or in sub-clause (g) of clause (1) of article 19 shall prevent the State from making any special provision, by law, for the advancement of any socially and educationally backward classes of citizens or for the Scheduled Castes or the Scheduled Tribes in
English
it can be modified .. plz see-
Nothing in this article or in clause (2) of article 29 shall prevent the State from making any special provision for the advancement of any socially and educationally backward classes of citizens or for the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes.
Nethrapal@nethrapal
Keep dreaming that reservation should be removed. I will tell you why it can't be removed. Firstly, there are three types of reservations under the constitution. Reservation for MLA/MP seats, reservation in educational seats, and finally reservations in public jobs. The constitution gave a 10-year limit only for political reservation and not reservation in education and public jobs. They are a permanent feature and cannot be removed. Now, to remove political reservation also, you need a 2/3rd majority, which no political party has. So, how will you remove reservation is the question??? OBC reservation was also in the constitution from the beginning. Yes. we can remove one reservation for sure. That is EWS reservation. Let's start and remove EWS reservation
English
these premier institutes, your life is made and you are competent to compete ...@PMOIndia
English
NLUs, AIIMs etc..3.once u avail benefit of reservation for admission in any of these institutes, u will not be allowed to avail reservation in government jobs. logic is v simple- let others within the same group of SC/ST/OBC avail of benefits bcoz once u get admission in any of
English
Removing the castes is a societal issue whereas giving reservation is a legal n governance issue..it needs a lot of modification like1. introduction of creamy layer concept even within SC/ST; 2. limiting reservation to only one institute of national importance eg IITs, IIMs, ISc,
Shivani@meme_ki_diwani
Demanding to remove caste-based reservation without asking to remove caste system is the reason this will fail.
English
NO need at all .. they bound hv improved on the existing road itself .. may be build a few over bridges etc..@PMOIndia
English
Not only quality is v poor .. some of the infrastructure being built at huge environmental cost ( by cutting lakhs of fully grown trees) is just unacceptable .. we need to look for alternative sites .. for eg road from delhi to DDN entailed felling of lakhs of trees .. there was
Muthukrishnan Dhandapani@dmuthuk
As much as the central government is taking credit for building a lot of infrastructure, it needs to find out why a significant number of these projects are of poor quality. What is the use of pouring billions into building infrastructure that will probably not last very long? Infrastructure built with current technology and developments should last for many decades. Quantity can be appreciated only if there is quality. Otherwise, it is a drain on resources and merely ends up as vanity projects.
English