ravon1227

$2,400 a month. From a chat that costs $12 to join. For three years she trained without a camera. No content, no plan, just reps. Then she opened a private chat — daily support, video form corrections, $12 a month. 200 people joined and stayed. Not the flashy part of her income. Not the personal programs, not the guide. Just a chat, and people who kept paying month after month because they kept seeing progress. The brain behind it — Claude. One voice note after training turns into headlines, captions, and DM replies for the whole week. How she built a $12 chat into her most stable income stream — in the article 👇

$5,000 a month. From a phone she used to leave in her locker. For three years it stayed there, switched off, next to a towel and a water bottle — no camera, no thought of content. Six months ago she turned it on by accident, just to film one set as a memory. Today that phone brings in more than her main job. 15 clients at $150/month, a $12 chat club with 200 members, a $19 guide. No ads, no sponsorships, 12-15 thousand followers in a niche most would call too narrow: over-30s with back pain and no free time. The brain behind it — Claude. One voice note after training: "what I did, how I felt" → headlines, captions, DM replies, ready in minutes. How she turned a locked phone into $5,000/month — in the article 👇

Most people quit in month two. She didn't. Not because she was more disciplined — because she knew the numbers would look like failure before they looked like anything at all. Three years of training, no camera. Then two to three months of near-zero after she started posting — before trust built, before anyone recognized her videos. Her tools cost the same $20 a month whether she had 500 followers or 15,000. The only "expensive" part — the workout itself — she already had for free, every single day. Now: 15 clients at $150/month, a $12 chat club with 200 members, a $19 guide. About $5,000 a month. The brain behind it — Claude. One voice note after training, a week of content ready. What she did differently in those first two months — in the article 👇

She had fewer followers than most fitness pages. But she had more clients. 12-15 thousand followers. Not a hundred thousand, not a million. But one in three comments was the same question: "how do I do this with my back too?" She could've made general fitness content and gotten more views. Instead she picked one narrow pain: workouts for people over 30, with back pain, with no free time. Nothing else. Fewer views. Far more people willing to pay. That's the part most people get backwards — a narrow audience converts better than a broad one, because the person feels the video was made just for them. Now: 15 clients at $150/month, a $12 chat club with 200 members, a $19 guide — about $5,000 a month. The brain behind the content — Claude. One voice note after training turns into a week of headlines, captions, and DM replies. How she found that one niche — in the article 👇

$5,000 a month. No ads. No million followers. Just a phone after her workout. 3 years of training in silence — no camera, no content. 15 clients at $150/month, a $12 chat club with 200 members, a $19 guide. That's the whole system behind the number. No sponsorships, no protein powder ads, no huge audience — just 12-15 thousand followers in a niche most would call too narrow: over-30s with back pain and no free time. The brain behind it — Claude. One voice note after training: "what I did, how I felt" → headlines, captions, DM replies, ready in minutes. The trick that brought half her clients — and the exact prompts she uses — in the article 👇

She filmed her gym sets for fun. Now it's $5,000 a month. She filmed her gym sets for fun. Now it's $5,000 a month. For three years she just went to the gym. Six months ago she turned on her phone by accident — just to film one set "as a memory." Not a blogger, not a guru. An ordinary woman with an average fitness level. The difference is she stopped throwing away what she was already doing for free every day. Her niche: workouts for people over 30, with back pain and no free time. 15 clients at $150, a chat club of 200 people at $12, a PDF guide at $19. The brain of the system is Claude: one voice note about "what I did and how I felt" → ready-made headlines, captions, DM replies. The trick that gave her 10x reach — that's in the article. She broke down the whole system and the 6 prompts she uses herself 👇

@ironmind26 claude is not gonna stopping

I FOUND THE TOOL THAT MADE HIM $8,700 LAST MONTH. YOU'VE NEVER HEARD OF IT. Nobody's talking about it yet. By the time they do, the early advantage will be gone. Here's what happened. Ryan is 27. Lives in Austin. Spent three years building SaaS products that never got traction. Too slow to ship, too expensive to maintain, too complex to explain to customers. He found Nexus on a Tuesday night. Read the docs for two hours. Opened Claude and started asking questions. Not "write me code." Instead: "Design a complete workflow architecture for automating cross-chain data verification using Nexus proving infrastructure. Give me every component, every integration point, every failure mode." Claude returned a complete system blueprint in 11 minutes. Ryan built it over the weekend. A verification workflow that pulls data from multiple chains, proves its validity through Nexus, and delivers a signed result to the client automatically. He packaged it as a service. Charged $1,200 per integration setup plus $400/month maintenance per client. First client signed day three. Second and third came from a single tweet showing the workflow running live. Month one: $2,400. Month two: $5,600. Month three: $8,700. Seven clients. One weekend of building. Claude designed the architecture. Nexus handled the proof generation. Ryan handled the sales calls. Most developers are still building trust through reputation and contracts. Ryan builds it through cryptographic proof that runs in seconds. That gap is worth $8,700 a month right now. And nobody is filling it yet. Full system breakdown with exact Claude prompts — next article. Save this.

She filmed her gym sets for fun. Now it's $5,000 a month. For 3 years she just went to the gym. Six months ago she turned on her phone by accident — just to film one set "as a memory." Not a blogger, not a guru. An ordinary woman with an average fitness level. The difference is she stopped throwing away what she was already doing for free every day. Her niche: workouts for people over 30, with back pain and no free time. 15 clients at $150, chat club of 200 people at $12, PDF guide at $19. The brain of the system is Claude: one voice note about "what I did and how I felt" → ready-made headlines, captions, DM replies. The trick that gave her 10x reach — that's in the article. She broke down the whole system and the 6 prompts she uses herself 👇

@sairahul1 a little bit hard for new guys in these sphere

Google just dropped a 1-hour course on agentic engineering from scratch: 00:00 – How to build your first AI agent 08:24 – Build agent memory (short, persistent, long) 28:34 – Agentic loops, long-running AI agents 40:04 – How to build MCP (MCP vs API) 1:00:22 – Multi-agentic systems This 1-hour watch will replace 10 paid agentic courses on the internet. Bookmark this. Watch this weekend.

A single 15-sec video brought her half of her clients and $2,500 a month For 3 years she just went to the gym. 6 months ago she turned on her phone by accident — just to film one set "as a memory." Not a blogger, not a guru. An ordinary woman with an average fitness level. The difference is she stopped throwing away what she was already doing for free every day. Her niche: workouts for people over 30, with back pain and no free time. 15 clients at $150, a chat club of 200 people at $12, a PDF guide at $19. The brain of the system is Claude: one voice note about "what I did and how I felt" → ready-made headlines, captions, DM replies. The main trick that gave her 10x reach — that's in the article. She broke down the whole system and the 6 prompts she uses herself 👇

@RohOnChain 850k per year🤯

My friend makes $850,000/year as an Anthropic AI engineer. No MIT. No Stanford. No PhD. I asked him how he broke into AI from scratch. He sent me a course that was never supposed to get out. A developer teaching to build self-improving AI agents from scratch. You will learn exactly how AI agents like Claude Code and OpenClaw are actually built. You won't find anything better about becoming an AI engineer in 2026 than this video. I watched it last night. Halfway through, I realized I could land a role at a top AI lab in months, not years. Bookmark this and read the article below.

@0xCodila will save this prompt

Anthropic Core Agents team: "everyone's scripting agents step by step we spent months building complex workflows - all fragile, all wrong" here's how Anthropic builds agents now: step 1 → stop scripting steps. give the agent the goal - it'll find the path itself step 2 → run two agents against each other: one proposes, one breaks it - best answer wins step 3 → agent stuck? it calls a smarter model to unblock step 4 → every rule you delete makes the agent smarter, not dumber the smarter the model, the thinner the harness. stop over-engineering watch now, new workshop from the Claude Product team on building agents ↓

@ironmind26 great setup

3,100 NOTES. TWO PROMPTS. $28,000 IN 5 WEEKS. I hadn't touched NotebookLM in months. Combined it with Obsidian and Claude in one afternoon. Found a product library I'd been building by accident for 3 years. Here's exactly what happened. I exported my entire Obsidian vault. 3,100 notes across 4 years. Client calls, framework drafts, random insights, half-finished ideas dumped into markdown files with zero organization. Uploaded all of it into NotebookLM as a single source. Then I asked NotebookLM to generate an audio overview of the entire vault. Not to listen to it. To find the gaps. 19 minutes of AI-generated conversation about my own thinking playing back at me. Two voices discussing patterns in my work I had never articulated out loud. Frameworks referenced in passing that I had never named. Solutions mentioned as obvious that I had never packaged. I transcribed the entire audio. Fed it into Claude with one prompt: "Find every unnamed system, framework, or repeatable process mentioned in this transcript and turn each one into a sellable product." Claude came back with 9 products. Not ideas — complete product outlines with names, delivery processes, pricing logic, and target buyers. Built entirely from language I had already written across 3,100 notes over 4 years. I had invented 9 products without knowing I was inventing them. I packaged the 4 strongest that weekend. Claude wrote every sales page, every product description, every onboarding email using words already inside my vault. I wrote nothing new. $700 product sold 11 times. $1,200 product sold 9 times. $2,100 product sold 6 times. $3,400 product sold 4 times. $28,100 in 5 weeks from notes I thought were just organized chaos. Obsidian captured 4 years of thinking. NotebookLM made it audible. Claude turned it into products. Three tools. One afternoon of setup. $28,000 from work already done. Exact prompts that found the $28,000 — next article. Save this.

One squat video made her $6,700 in a single month — 0 ads Here's exactly what happened. She's been squatting on camera for over a year with barely any views. Then she changed one thing, and the next month she made $6,700 from it. The workout stayed the same. She still just films herself squatting — back squat, front squat, box squat, nothing new. What changed is what happens after she hits record. She runs the clip through an AI tool that checks her depth, knee tracking, and bar path. The AI writes a short caption pointing out one specific fix per video. That's it. That single caption line is why the video stopped getting ignored. People don't scroll past a squat clip that quietly corrects a mistake they didn't know they had. Her average watch time went from 3 seconds to 21 seconds almost overnight. X pays more the longer people stay, and this is exactly what triggered it. $2,400 of that $6,700 came straight from Creator Revenue Sharing on views alone. The other $4,300 came from something she sells, not something the platform pays her for. She packaged 30 AI prompts that analyze squat form the same way her videos do. The bundle is $15, and she sells around 60-90 copies a week without fail. There's no course, no calls, no coaching involved. Just a bio link and a caption that says "this is the prompt I actually use." Nobody's paying for a squat tutorial. They're paying for a shortcut — type in what your squat looks like, get the fix back instantly. Filming takes 10 minutes. Running it through AI takes another 5. No editor, no gym partnership, no certification needed to start this. One exercise, one prompt pack, $6,700 — that's the whole business model.

$12,000 IN 90 DAYS - 3 WORKOUT VIDEOS A WEEK, 0 SPONSORS Here's the full breakdown of how she did it. Three months ago she had 1,200 followers and zero income from content. Now she has 89,000 followers and $12,000 earned in 90 days. The formula is simple: 3 videos a week, each 20-40 seconds long. She films regular workouts — squats, bench press, deadlifts. Nothing fancy, no scripts. Every video gets run through an AI tool that analyzes her form. The AI generates a short caption with 2-3 specific technique tips. That's the trick. Videos like this hold viewers 15-20 seconds longer than a plain gym clip. X rewards high-retention content — and pays for it directly through Creator Revenue Sharing. She made $2,900 just from views alone. The other $9,100 came from selling AI prompts she uses herself. It's a bundle of 40 ready-made prompts for analyzing workout technique. The pack costs $17, and she sells 50-70 copies a week on average. One post with a bio link sometimes brings in 150+ sales in a single day. The prompts are simple: paste in the exercise, get back form errors and fixes. People aren't buying information. They're buying a system they don't have to build themselves. Another 10% of revenue comes from an affiliate program with a fitness AI app. Each video takes 20 minutes to film and 10 minutes for AI processing. No team, no editor — just a phone, one AI tool, and 30 minutes. Over 90 days that's roughly $133 a day with zero ad spend. The bottom line: AI isn't the coach here — it's what turns trust into money.

@DurovPD 3:2

$2000 to 2 people who predicts correct score. ends in 24 hrs

Im back, Im so back!

@ironmind26 Fantastic result for obsidian vault

4,200 NOTES. ONE PROMPT. $31,000 IN THE FIRST MONTH I hadn't opened half of them in two years. Claude read all 4,200 in one session and found six figures hiding inside. Here's exactly what happened. I exported my entire Obsidian vault. Every messy note, every half-finished idea, every client call transcript dumped into markdown files over three years. Fed it into Claude in batches of 200 files at a time. One prompt: "Find every repeatable solution I've built across these notes that I could package and sell today." Claude came back with 11 frameworks. Not summaries — actual named systems with clear inputs, outputs, and delivery processes. Things I had invented for one client and then rebuilt from scratch for the next one because I never saw them as products. I had been doing the same work 11 times and charging once each time. I packaged the 4 strongest frameworks that same weekend. Claude wrote the sales page, the delivery process, and the pricing for each one directly from language already inside my notes. I didn't write a single new sentence. $600 product sold 14 times. $1,100 product sold 11 times. $1,800 product sold 6 times. $2,400 product sold 3 times. $31,200 in 4 weeks from notes collecting dust in a local folder. Obsidian isn't a note-taking app. It's a revenue archive that most people never unlock because they can't read 4,200 files simultaneously. Claude can. In one session. For $20 a month. Exact prompt that found the $31,000 — next article. Save this.

@ranger_finance @voltrxyz @SolanaConf Holy moly

Ranger has acquired @voltrxyz. With this acquisition, Rangers will soon have access to institutional-grade yields. More at @SolanaConf.