ASURE 🥷

I now honestly think that most engineers who still think that agents will be plopped into existing software development loops - tickets, push to GitHub, run CI, review a PR, merge a PR - aren't thinking far enough ahead.

BREAKING: Full video that briefly appeared on President Trump’s TruthSocial post.

All my new code will be closed-source from now on. I've contributed millions of lines of carefully written OSS code over the past decade, spent thousands of hours helping other people. If you want to use my libraries (1M+ downloads/month) in the future, you have to pay. I made good money funneling people through my OSS and being recognized as expert in several fields. This was entirely based on HUMANS knowing and seeing me by USING and INTERACTING with my code. No humans will ever read my docs again when coding agents do it in seconds. Nobody will even know it's me who built it. Look at Tailwind: 75 million downloads/month, more popular than ever, revenue down 80%, docs traffic down 40%, 75% of engineering team laid off. Someone submitted a PR to add LLM-optimized docs and Wathan had to decline - optimizing for agents accelerates his business's death. He's being asked to build the infrastructure for his own obsolescence. Two of the most common OSS business models: - Open Core: Give away the library, sell premium once you reach critical mass (Tailwind UI, Prisma Accelerate, Supabase Cloud...) - Expertise Moat: Be THE expert in your library - consulting gigs, speaking, higher salary Tailwind just proved the first one is dying. Agents bypass the documentation funnel. They don't see your premium tier. Every project relying on docs-to-premium conversion will face the same pressure: Prisma, Drizzle, MikroORM, Strapi, and many more. The core insight: OSS monetization was always about attention. Human eyeballs on your docs, brand, expertise. That attention has literally moved into attention layers. Your docs trained the models that now make visiting you unnecessary. Human attention paid. Artificial attention doesn't. Some OSS will keep going - wealthy devs doing it for fun or education. That's not a system, that's charity. Most popular OSS runs on economic incentives. Destroy them, they stop playing. Why go closed-source? When the monetization funnel is broken, you move payment to the only point that still exists: access. OSS gave away access hoping to monetize attention downstream. Agents broke downstream. Closed-source gates access directly. The final irony: OSS trained the models now killing it. We built our own replacement. My prediction: a new marketplace emerges, built for agents. Want your agent to use Tailwind? Prisma? Pay per access. Libraries become APIs with meters. The old model: free code -> human attention -> monetization. The new model: pay at the gate or your agent doesn't get in.

إطار Tailwind تلقّى ضربة قوية خسر 80% من الإيرادات وقلّص 75% من الفريق بسبب الـAI 😬 القصة طلعت للعلن بعد PR كان يقترح يضيفون ملف llm.txt (توثيق مبسّط مخصص للـLLM ووكلاء الكودينق). مؤسس Tailwind رفض الـPR، وشرح إن الذكاء الاصطناعي أصلاً ضرب البزنس عندهم: ترافيك الدوكيومنتيشن نازل 40%، ومع إن الدوكيومنتيشن كانت قبل هي اللي تجيب الناس ومنها يتحولون لمنتجاتهم المدفوعة.

رامي مالك عامل دور جميل اوي في فيلم نوروبرج nuremberg بخلاف كدة… الحقبة الزمنية بتاعة اخر الحرب العالمية التانية هي اللي شكلت عالمنا الحالي و بسببها امريكا ركبت العالم… دايما بيبقى كويس تاخود "فكرة" عن التاريخ، عشان تفهم ما وراء الاحداث… بس متصدقش كل حاجة… لان التاريخ يكتبه المنتصر