Amit Garg

82 posts

Amit Garg

Amit Garg

@realAmitGarg

Founder & CIO: Intugic Capital - India Macro & Pvt Investments. Previously at EAAA Alternatives (co-founder & head of global business development)

Mumbai, India Katılım Mart 2026
7 Takip Edilen17 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Amit Garg
Amit Garg@realAmitGarg·
In G.O.D we trust --------------------- My 1st employer..... (such beautiful days, those were, in the late 90s, with just 4000 of us, at the red Keonics building off Hosur Road - did I spell that right? - When you could see nrn floating around keeping bathrooms clean in a matter-of-fact way and setting standards of conduct one would innately aspire to, and building greatness along the way, with the rest of the founders) .....had this motto, way back in 1998: "In GOD we trust, All rest we test" Its served them well, I would say. In a strange coincidence, the first real threat to what I now call the Gold Oil Dollar trinity (GOD trinity) also came around that time – 1998-99 ----------------- But we first take a short detour before we continue with the above story: (The origins of the GOD trinity go back, To that fateful day of 15 Aug 1971 when Nixon “temporarily” demonetised Gold... an action that took almost 8 years to fix___ ___fix by reinstalling $ at the centre of global economics, by basically ensuring that, only through $ can the world get CHEAP oil, and only through $ can oil sellers get CHEAP gold, at scale___ ___an action led by many, such as Kissinger and Volcker, and an action resisted by many incl De Gaulle, Zjilstra et al>>> >>>these are all nice stories and important to know, if one wishes to understand the GOD trinity properly – it helps if you speak Dutch though (I don’t), or else much of Zjilstra gets lost in translation~~~ ~~~the deGaulle-Zjilstra resistance was finally nailed in the proverbial coffin, by procuring the now famous "Blessing Letter", and very strangely, it was still up there on bundesbank website, last I checked a few years ago~~~ ~~~To be sure, the resistance continued in shadow forms and sizzling nomenclature – involving the Snake, the Tunnel inside the Snake, the Gold Pool which broke the floor of Bank of England in its final days, and much much much much more:::::: :::but overall, at least 50 years had been won by Heinz Alfred Kissinger & Paul Volcker by their brilliant re-alignment of the Saudis, the BIS, the Swiss, and the British, with some German Blessing of course, to set up what I call the GOD trinity, take rates to 20% to show Oil what happens if they bid for gold directly and not through the dollar [and sold to public as fighting inflation at all costs - but that narrative fools nobody if one just looks at the constant change to monetary thought driving the Fed in the final years of that decade, with a stark change made only for about a year where rates of 20% were justified by Volcker by saying - freshly back from Belagarde to deal with this emergency, as the mythical story goes - that he is not targeting Rates, he is targeting something else and if that takes rates to 20%, its the markets' doing, not his own...Noice] ) ----------------- ....(so as I was saying, and paraphrasing from memory - before I took this maze-like circuitous detour – the first credible threat to GOD trinity, came around the same time,) on 1st Jan 1999 with the launch of the Euro. The Euro threat was dealt with severally - prior to and after its launch: - The games began before the launch, starting with the leak of LBMA volumes by The Red Baron in Jan 1997 – it shook the world - Much happened in 1997 & 1998 but recounting that would take several pages…so we fast fwd to launch day - Soon after launch, in May 1999, Gordon Brown pledged to sell half of England’s Gold to defend a low price - in response EU CBs in Sep 1999 reversed their 20-year stance of keeping gold low – and brought an end to the CB Gold Agreements (CBGAs supplied – leased - CB gold to back paper gold and keep process low) - soon thereafter, on 22 Sep 1999 the paper gold market imploded as Price rose 22% in 2 weeks - this invoked a combined response from the Fed and the BoE to put a lid on price yet again - the final step was taken in 2001, in various ways, including ascension of China to the WTO in Dec 2001 The tensions of that year are aptly captured by Eddie George, Governor of BoE in making the famously quoted statement: "We looked into the abyss if the gold price rose further. A further rise would have taken down one or several trading houses, which might have taken down all the rest in their wake. Therefore at any price, at any cost, the central banks had to quell the gold price, manage it. It was very difficult to get the gold price under control but we have now succeeded.” Succeed they did, but only temporarily as the problem kept popping back every 6-7 years...and had to be recurrently taken care of – sometimes by war, sometimes by financial crises, sometimes by calamities, sometimes this and sometimes that - whatever can be politically explained to and acceptable to the public... Fast forward to present day: In Gold circles, its been discussed since 1997 (these discussions run into 20,000+ pages, if you are interested in reading - which I highly recommend) that the final showdown will be for the fealty of Oil… And if one reads this along with what Mackinder & co have proposed, then the lands holding the keys are the mountains and valleys where Darius walked eons past – because geography is destiny (or so it was/is thought, before the MBAs and their ilk replaced ‘Geography” with ‘Demographics’): True to these expectations from 29 years ago, and rolling forward: It started last May but was curtailed. It started this Feb but will it be curtailed? We do not know. ~~~~~~~~~~~ But the more it picks pace: - the more will Gold go into hiding (forcing MTM of CB balance sheets by declaring "sales" for public consumption AND resulting in screen price declining as people who understand gold exit paper promises - thereby calling into question the false understanding that sophisticated financial asset managers hold - of gold being a safe haven, of gold being a (read this carefully) HEDGE AGAINST INFLATION OF DOLLARS AND YET PRICED NOT ONLY IN-DOLLARS BUT ALSO BY-DOLLARS….or gold screen price falling due to CB sales - such distractions, I must say, these understandings are) - the more will Oil go into hiding (under rational-sounding constraints of - oilfields burning, ports burning, waterways burning, carriers burning...whatever) ~~~~~~~~~~~ So does MTR (Marked to Reality) of TR, FR et al CB Gold books indicate gold going into hiding? I dont know yet. Eventually, its inevitable. Its only a call on timing. And when thy Kingdom come, when G and O go subterranean, world's D will head home (as remember, foreigners collectively CANNOT get rid of their Ds - they can do so only individually, not collectively, its math - and hence all the talk of foreigners dumping USTs is...well...is non sequitur...for at least 3 clear reasons, which I will not go into now as this post is already too long...perhaps it should have been a memo with a more formal language and structure). So we watch the current world with interest. With context of history. With an axiom that GOD trinity is the synonym of post ww2 world order. And every major world event since then has largely been about this. The night remains young... but wont be so forever... Paraphrasing from memory: "As we learn, so do we act. As with most things in life, it is better to follow a well walked path. Many before you have walked the path of gold. But, since no 2 persons can walk the same walk, each must gather wealth as his understanding allows." Gold is the only true wealth. "Gold, get you some"
English
0
0
0
370
Nitin Pai
Nitin Pai@acorn·
I have long argued that it is in India’s interests for energy cartels to weaken. UAE pulling out of OPEC is good for us.
English
36
178
1.6K
55.3K
Amena Bakr
Amena Bakr@Amena__Bakr·
I’ve read the obituary of OPEC too many times. Yet, time and again, the group proves more resilient than its critics surviving even its deepest challenges. #opec #OOTT
English
21
14
84
12.5K
Sahil Kapoor
Sahil Kapoor@SahilKapoor·
UAE has announced it will leave OPEC and OPEC+ effective May 1, 2026. That is a major event because UAE joined OPEC in 1967 and is one of the group’s most important Gulf producers. OPEC has survived exits before: Qatar, Ecuador, Indonesia, Angola. But UAE is different. It is not a marginal producer. It is a rich Gulf producer with meaningful spare capacity, large investments in future capacity, and close strategic importance to the oil market. The dismantling of OPEC (if it happens comprehensively) will cause a massive market share grab war and drive the price of Oil towards marginal cost of production. The poor demand from underlying markets doesn’t help Oil's case either. The war led price spikes could become a tool to manage prices.
Sahil Kapoor tweet media
English
16
12
105
9.4K
Geiger Capital
Geiger Capital@Geiger_Capital·
UAE could now potentially produce more oil than the OPEC+ quota previously allowed them… This move could force others to follow. Oil supply going up.
Geiger Capital tweet media
English
219
692
3.9K
258.9K
Ajay Bagga
Ajay Bagga@Ajay_Bagga·
U.A.E.’s OPEC Exit Deals Major Blow to Cartel Amid Middle East Oil Squeeze The Persian Gulf state said the move would help it meet changing demand but analysts see it as a heavy blow to the organization.
English
4
3
92
4.6K
Ahfaz Mustafa
Ahfaz Mustafa@ahfazmustaf·
Can someone who understands the impact of UAE leaving opec please explain this to me in complete layman terms.
English
579
437
10.2K
3.1M
Amit Garg
Amit Garg@realAmitGarg·
Amit Garg@realAmitGarg

UAE - some Q&A ----------------- 1. Is this the start of the end of OPEC+? Unlikely. If that were to happen, led by other members willing to go solo (if not accorded larger quotas by OPEC+), then OPEC+ dissolution would have been the Big-announcement of yesterday, and not the UAE one. But it wasnt. That indicates that OPEC+ sustains. 2. Why would UAE do this - after all, their push for higher production quotas has been a longstanding one? This goes much beyond oil-economics. This is UAE's declaration of a 2nd pole in the Middle East. The other Pole, under OPEC, led by KSA would remain. An agreement under this would have had UAE: - give up its interest in Yemen, Sudan, more to come...and - get $ Lines, Oil production independence, ability to form its own 'bloc', ability to transcend both the US institutions and BRICS institutions, and more to come This fundamentally creates a two-pole system in the unsanctioned Middle East. Eventually, in the short run, it is very likely that Iran will also fit somewhere in this emerging order. 3. Why now Things are moving at breakneck speed - from 12 day war to tariffs to ongoing war to swap lines to this, let alone the proxy-realignment in the entire region over the same period. It seems that things are running against a clock, and that clock is quite visible for us to see. 4. Where does Oil price goes from here? It depends on what the new poles of the world order desire. Whether they desire a low price or a high price, in currency terms. Whether they desire for gold to overtly price oil yet again, or to let it continue to do so covertly. Whether they want non-polar growth or not. There are too many moving parts at this stage. We wait and watch.

English
0
0
0
6
Neeraj Bajpai
Neeraj Bajpai@NeerajCNBC·
The UAE will be leaving OPEC effective May 1st. It joined OPEC in 1967, seven years after the organization was founded. The UAE was the third-largest producer in OPEC in February behind Saudi Arabia and Iraq. #OPEC #WarAndOil
Neeraj Bajpai tweet media
English
15
6
82
3.8K
Amit Garg
Amit Garg@realAmitGarg·
Amit Garg@realAmitGarg

UAE - some Q&A ----------------- 1. Is this the start of the end of OPEC+? Unlikely. If that were to happen, led by other members willing to go solo (if not accorded larger quotas by OPEC+), then OPEC+ dissolution would have been the Big-announcement of yesterday, and not the UAE one. But it wasnt. That indicates that OPEC+ sustains. 2. Why would UAE do this - after all, their push for higher production quotas has been a longstanding one? This goes much beyond oil-economics. This is UAE's declaration of a 2nd pole in the Middle East. The other Pole, under OPEC, led by KSA would remain. An agreement under this would have had UAE: - give up its interest in Yemen, Sudan, more to come...and - get $ Lines, Oil production independence, ability to form its own 'bloc', ability to transcend both the US institutions and BRICS institutions, and more to come This fundamentally creates a two-pole system in the unsanctioned Middle East. Eventually, in the short run, it is very likely that Iran will also fit somewhere in this emerging order. 3. Why now Things are moving at breakneck speed - from 12 day war to tariffs to ongoing war to swap lines to this, let alone the proxy-realignment in the entire region over the same period. It seems that things are running against a clock, and that clock is quite visible for us to see. 4. Where does Oil price goes from here? It depends on what the new poles of the world order desire. Whether they desire a low price or a high price, in currency terms. Whether they desire for gold to overtly price oil yet again, or to let it continue to do so covertly. Whether they want non-polar growth or not. There are too many moving parts at this stage. We wait and watch.

English
0
0
0
4
Prashant Nair
Prashant Nair@_prashantnair·
UAE is exiting OPEC effective May 1 after 50+ years ! Means more oil supply. Whenever the Strait reopens. UAE has nearly 5 mbpd of capacity. 5% of global oil. #Nifty #BankNifty #IranWar#Trump #OPEC
English
7
15
129
8.1K
Amit Garg
Amit Garg@realAmitGarg·
Amit Garg@realAmitGarg

UAE - some Q&A ----------------- 1. Is this the start of the end of OPEC+? Unlikely. If that were to happen, led by other members willing to go solo (if not accorded larger quotas by OPEC+), then OPEC+ dissolution would have been the Big-announcement of yesterday, and not the UAE one. But it wasnt. That indicates that OPEC+ sustains. 2. Why would UAE do this - after all, their push for higher production quotas has been a longstanding one? This goes much beyond oil-economics. This is UAE's declaration of a 2nd pole in the Middle East. The other Pole, under OPEC, led by KSA would remain. An agreement under this would have had UAE: - give up its interest in Yemen, Sudan, more to come...and - get $ Lines, Oil production independence, ability to form its own 'bloc', ability to transcend both the US institutions and BRICS institutions, and more to come This fundamentally creates a two-pole system in the unsanctioned Middle East. Eventually, in the short run, it is very likely that Iran will also fit somewhere in this emerging order. 3. Why now Things are moving at breakneck speed - from 12 day war to tariffs to ongoing war to swap lines to this, let alone the proxy-realignment in the entire region over the same period. It seems that things are running against a clock, and that clock is quite visible for us to see. 4. Where does Oil price goes from here? It depends on what the new poles of the world order desire. Whether they desire a low price or a high price, in currency terms. Whether they desire for gold to overtly price oil yet again, or to let it continue to do so covertly. Whether they want non-polar growth or not. There are too many moving parts at this stage. We wait and watch.

English
0
0
0
7
Gurmeet Chadha
Gurmeet Chadha@connectgurmeet·
UAE exits OPEC… the supply shock due to Strait of Hormuz will gradually lead to a large demand shock too if the blockage continues.. also a big shift happening in energy mix and supply chains I could be wrong but my sense is Oil is headed lower.. Much lower in medium term !!
English
70
38
804
45.8K
Amit Garg
Amit Garg@realAmitGarg·
Amit Garg@realAmitGarg

UAE - some Q&A ----------------- 1. Is this the start of the end of OPEC+? Unlikely. If that were to happen, led by other members willing to go solo (if not accorded larger quotas by OPEC+), then OPEC+ dissolution would have been the Big-announcement of yesterday, and not the UAE one. But it wasnt. That indicates that OPEC+ sustains. 2. Why would UAE do this - after all, their push for higher production quotas has been a longstanding one? This goes much beyond oil-economics. This is UAE's declaration of a 2nd pole in the Middle East. The other Pole, under OPEC, led by KSA would remain. An agreement under this would have had UAE: - give up its interest in Yemen, Sudan, more to come...and - get $ Lines, Oil production independence, ability to form its own 'bloc', ability to transcend both the US institutions and BRICS institutions, and more to come This fundamentally creates a two-pole system in the unsanctioned Middle East. Eventually, in the short run, it is very likely that Iran will also fit somewhere in this emerging order. 3. Why now Things are moving at breakneck speed - from 12 day war to tariffs to ongoing war to swap lines to this, let alone the proxy-realignment in the entire region over the same period. It seems that things are running against a clock, and that clock is quite visible for us to see. 4. Where does Oil price goes from here? It depends on what the new poles of the world order desire. Whether they desire a low price or a high price, in currency terms. Whether they desire for gold to overtly price oil yet again, or to let it continue to do so covertly. Whether they want non-polar growth or not. There are too many moving parts at this stage. We wait and watch.

English
0
0
0
15
Jim Bianco
Jim Bianco@biancoresearch·
Last week, the UAE asked for swap lines with the Fed/Treasury. This week, they leave OPEC+. While the world asks who will blink first, the US or Iran ... maybe the answer is the UAE. The economic pain the UAE is under is intolerable for them, worse than that of Iran.
zerohedge@zerohedge

BOOM *UAE DECIDES TO EXIT OPEC AND OPEC+

English
149
398
2.3K
288.5K
Amit Garg
Amit Garg@realAmitGarg·
UAE - some Q&A ----------------- 1. Is this the start of the end of OPEC+? Unlikely. If that were to happen, led by other members willing to go solo (if not accorded larger quotas by OPEC+), then OPEC+ dissolution would have been the Big-announcement of yesterday, and not the UAE one. But it wasnt. That indicates that OPEC+ sustains. 2. Why would UAE do this - after all, their push for higher production quotas has been a longstanding one? This goes much beyond oil-economics. This is UAE's declaration of a 2nd pole in the Middle East. The other Pole, under OPEC, led by KSA would remain. An agreement under this would have had UAE: - give up its interest in Yemen, Sudan, more to come...and - get $ Lines, Oil production independence, ability to form its own 'bloc', ability to transcend both the US institutions and BRICS institutions, and more to come This fundamentally creates a two-pole system in the unsanctioned Middle East. Eventually, in the short run, it is very likely that Iran will also fit somewhere in this emerging order. 3. Why now Things are moving at breakneck speed - from 12 day war to tariffs to ongoing war to swap lines to this, let alone the proxy-realignment in the entire region over the same period. It seems that things are running against a clock, and that clock is quite visible for us to see. 4. Where does Oil price goes from here? It depends on what the new poles of the world order desire. Whether they desire a low price or a high price, in currency terms. Whether they desire for gold to overtly price oil yet again, or to let it continue to do so covertly. Whether they want non-polar growth or not. There are too many moving parts at this stage. We wait and watch.
English
0
0
1
9.2K